A.1 Summary of Commonly Used Metrics for T ext Generation Table 1: Summary of commonly used metrics for text generation. For settings and tasks, we only list the ones justified by the original paper for each metric. We conduct experiments on WMT19, and the results are shown in Tab. 2. We don't observe A.3 Prompt Set In Tab. 3, we list the full prompt set for both s h direction and h r direction. Prompt Set s h Last Tersely Succinctly In summation To put it succinctly After In brief All in all To summarize Bringing up the rear Behind In short In outline In a nutshell To come to the point Lastly Concisely In closing In conclusion In the final analysis In sum In precis In passing In winding up Without wasting words To end In a word To conclude Last in order At the end of the day Curtly Compactly Summarising In a few words Without waste of words Crisply Summarily In the rear As a final point Finally yet importantly At last To sum up Summarizing Not least of all To put it in a nutshell Pithily Basically Laconically To put it briefly When all is said and done Shortly In the end At the rear Not to mince words To cut a long story short In fine At the end To be brief Last but not least Not to beat about the bush Finally In essence Last of all Just as importantly In drawing things to a close Briefly Ultimately Elliptically To put it concisely Not to put too fine a point on ith r As To wit As it were Case in point As an illustration sc. That is Especially That is to say To give an example i.e.

Auto-regressive language models have been widely used for text generation. With the recent development of large-scale pre-trained language models (Radford et al., 2019; Brown et al., 2020; Raffel et al., 2020; Lewis et al., 2020), they have achieved state-of-the-art performances in applications

This work investigates whether modern speech models are sensitive to prosodic emphasis - whether they encode emphasized and neutral words in systematically different ways. Prior work typically relies on isolated acoustic correlates (e.g., pitch, duration) or label prediction, both of which miss the relational structure of emphasis. This paper proposes a residual-based framework, defining emphasis as the difference between paired neutral and emphasized word representations. Analysis on self-supervised speech models shows that these residuals correlate strongly with duration changes and perform poorly at word identity prediction, indicating a structured, relational encoding of prosodic emphasis. In ASR fine-tuned models, residuals occupy a subspace up to 50% more compact than in pre-trained models, further suggesting that emphasis is encoded as a consistent, low-dimensional transformation that becomes more structured with task-specific learning.

Abstract meaning representation (AMR) is a semantic formalism used to represent the meaning of sentences as directed acyclic graphs. In this paper, we describe how real digital dictionaries can be embedded into AMR directed graphs (digraphs), using state-of-the-art pre-trained large language models. Then, we reduce those graphs in a confluent manner, i.e. with transformations that preserve their circuit space. Finally, the properties of these reduces digraphs are analyzed and discussed in relation to the symbol grounding problem.

Most pre-trained Vision-Language (VL) models and training data for the downstream tasks are only available in English. Therefore, multilingual VL tasks are solved using cross-lingual transfer: fine-tune a multilingual pre-trained model or transfer the text encoder using parallel data. We study the alternative approach: transferring an already trained encoder using parallel data. We investigate the effect of parallel data: domain and the number of languages, which were out of focus in previous work. Our results show that even machine-translated task data are the best on average, caption-like authentic parallel data outperformed it in some languages. Further, we show that most languages benefit from multilingual training.