Reporting Guidelines for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Research

Every so often, a technology with the potential to disrupt clinical practice emerges and the medical literature explodes with new studies. These seismic events present a challenge to the peer review process because many reviewers and editorial board members may be unfamiliar with how to evaluate them. Complicating matters, early adopters and thought leaders may not use consistent terminology, may not report results similarly, or may not appreciate fully the potential for inaccurate conclusions based on interpretation errors.