The Second International Workshop on Human and Machine Cognition

The interdisciplinary makeup allowed for an expansion of the scope of Glymour's One notable extension was the move from android epistemology to android ethics. "they can know everything we know Margaret Boden presented her work Hayes and Ford were responding Participation was limited to 40 If the first two workshops on to the debate in Scientific American researchers selected from several disciplines human and machine cognition are (January 1990) between Searle and (principally computer science, representative, these meetings will the Churchlands about whether a philosophy, and psychology); become hotbeds of constructive and machine could think. Ironically, although this approach makes for much-needed debate. They focus on from the perspective of Hayes and stimulating discussion, it has resulted the foundational and methodological Ford, Searle and the Churchlands are in a competitive review process concerns of those who want to forge essentially in agreement, diverging (about a 10-percent acceptance rate). It is just a theories about the necessary in U.S. politics, the theme of the fact of life that there isn't much material basis (biological versus parallel) Second International Workshop on agreement about methodology and for intelligence. They both Human and Machine Cognition was, foundational issues within these two make specific implementation features What do androids know, and when fields. The positions covered One feature of the workshop that for intelligence. As might be expected, a wide range: "They can know facilitated and, at times, obstructed Paul Churchland objected to this only what androids can know: Android fruitful discussion was its highly interdisciplinary grouping.