2adee8815dd939548ee6b2772524b6f2-AuthorFeedback.pdf

We thank the reviewers for their insightful feedback. R1 feels the paper does "a good job of including reasonable baselines" while R2 and R4 prefer (Supplement Sec 3). R4 considers the comparisons to be "a variant of proposed methods", which we disagree with R3 is concerned that the experiments are 1D designs. Eqn. 4) are typically used as proxies for the true MI (Eqn. One could use (non-nested) alternatives (Supp.