eddb904a6db773755d2857aacadb1cb0-Reviews.html

Reviewer's response to the rebuttal "line 308: [10, 400] range for alpha We chose 400 because higher values of alpha caused computational difficulties in the Gibbs sampling. This upper bound is a bit arbitrary; however, we found the exact upper limit above about 100 had little effect on the estimates of transition probabilities. Similarly, adjusting the lower bound below 60 or so had little effect. While we do hope for a more well justified hyperprior for alpha in future work, we believe our choice did not overly influence the results." Please add this information to the paper.