We thank all reviewers for their insightful and constructive comments

We thank all reviewers for their insightful and constructive comments. Response to R#2 Q2.1:...The main weakness is novelty ... the novel contributions are in data scheduler and Such knowledge is new to the community and is better valued independent of tech contribution. As for the two novel techniques, we respect the reviewer's personal opinion, but we would greatly appreciate if the Q2.2: ...Another weakness of this paper is on the empirical side...when SimCLR is trained for 1000 epochs it SimCLR performs worse than our approach in longer training settings (69.3% Q2.3: ...notation details not properly introduced... We would check it carefully and improve the writing accordingly. We will add discussion of these papers in the revision.