Checklist

For all authors... (a) Do the main claims made in the abstract and introduction accurately reflect the paper's contributions and scope? While MARL algorithms may be implemented for potentially harmful applications, we do not believe this work uniquely enables such applications. If you ran experiments... (a) Did you include the code, data, and instructions needed to reproduce the main experimental results (either in the supplemental material or as a URL)? [Yes] In the supplemental material (b) Did you specify all the training details (e.g., data splits, hyperparameters, how they were chosen)? If you used crowdsourcing or conducted research with human subjects... (a) Did you include the full text of instructions given to participants and screenshots, if applicable? [N/A] (b) Did you describe any potential participant risks, with links to Institutional Review Board (IRB) approvals, if applicable? [N/A] (c) Did you include the estimated hourly wage paid to participants and the total amount spent on participant compensation? Our allocation proposal network and Q network are illustrated in Figures 7 and 8. Low-level action utility functions and mixing networks are similar to those described in Iqbal et al. [10] with the only 13 difference being a replacement of the RNN layers with standard fully connected layers.