Supplementary material for Dynamic Causal Bayesian Optimisation
–Neural Information Processing Systems
In this section we give the proof for Theorem 1 in the main text. W. This means that W includes those variables that are parents of Y Eq. (1) follows from Y Eq. (2) follows from the Eq. Exploiting Eq. (8) we can rewrite Eq. (6) as: We can further expand Eq. (11) noticing that in this case W = {Z In this section we give the proof for Proposition 3.1 in the main text. This section contains additional experimental details associated to the experiments discussed in Section 4 of the main text. Notice how the location of the optimum changes significantly both in terms of optimal set and intervention value when going from t = 0 to t = 1.
Neural Information Processing Systems
May-25-2025, 22:47:08 GMT
- Country:
- Europe (0.67)
- North America > United States
- California > San Francisco County
- San Francisco (0.14)
- Virginia (0.14)
- California > San Francisco County
- Industry:
- Banking & Finance > Economy (0.46)
- Government (0.46)
- Technology: