Export Reviews, Discussions, Author Feedback and Meta-Reviews

First provide a summary of the paper, and then address the following criteria: Quality, clarity, originality and significance. Beyond representing the position of an animal in a given environment, the activity of neurons in the hippocampus (areas CA1,3) is known to be influenced by a range of task-dependent factors, for instance the presence of a reward at a specific location in the environment; yet we don't fully understand how these representations emerge and what they are good for. The present paper proposes that these observations are a reflection of the circuit implementing a specific algorithm (using a successor representation, SR, initially proposed by Dayan in 1993) for learning state values for reinforcement learning; moreover it suggests that the representation in an upstream region (medial EC) may provide a basis for a hierarchical decomposition of space. Overall, some of the ideas put forward here are intriguing and potentially interesting for theoretical neuroscientists studying hippocampal coding, however the link to the neural data is relatively weak and the presentation of the material is difficult to follow in places. Detailed comments 1. Content: Since the algorithmic part of the paper is not new, the key contribution of this work is the link between the SR representation and the activity of neurons in the hippocampus. Unfortunately, this link between the two is not clear in several aspects: a) it is never spelled out exactly how does the matrix M relate to the firing of the neurons in the corresponding hippocampal circuit.If there is a one-to-one map between firing rates and M(s,s'), how can a downstream circuit compute V(s)?