We wish to thank our reviewers for their insightful feedback that helped us improve the clarity and overall quality of our

We have revised the paper as suggested by the reviewers. As mentioned by reviewer #1, the hardware requirements of PyTorch were not clearly explained. Reviewer #1 wondered about attribution. Since more than 1000 people have contributed to PyTorch, we can't Instead we've highlighted the people who had a profound impact on the library We've also acknowledged the impact of the community We fixed the typographical error line 87 pointed out by reviewer #1. We realized that didn't cite the "Automatic differentiation in PyTorch" work from Paszke, Gross, Chintala, Chanan, Y ang, DeVito, Lin, Desmaison, Antiga and Lerer submitted at the 2017 NIPS autodiff workshop.