Export Reviews, Discussions, Author Feedback and Meta-Reviews

First provide a summary of the paper, and then address the following criteria: Quality, clarity, originality and significance. The paper introduces an efficient feature transform of local decorrelation, which when combined with boosted (orthogonal) decision trees, considerably improves over the state-of-the-art on pedestrian detection. Overall, it is a clearly (and nicely) written paper with good analysis, enough details and solid experiments. Pros: - Very well written and executed paper - Attention to detail - Solid results - Straight forward and intuitive method Cons: - Incremental from Hariharan et al. (not major, see later) - If it claims ``Improved Detection'', as opposed to ``Improved Pedestrian Detection'', then I would have liked to see some more results on object detection or likewise. Going from global to local decorrelation, and doing the right analysis for design decisions set it apart.