00989c20ff1386dc386d8124ebcba1a5-AuthorFeedback.pdf

We thank all the reviewers for their helpful feedback and positive view of our work. To address the re-1 viewers concerns (R3,R4,R5), we have added a comparison to Duan et al.'s One Shot Imitation learning in2 Tables 3 and 2, a comparison to a non-normalized TECNet ablation, as well as an evaluation on a Viz-3 Doom navigation task in Table 1. We believe that these additions address all of the main reviewer concerns.4 We evaluate our method in ViZDoom where the goal is to visit waypoints in apredetermined order. Istheembedding14 normalized in the same way in your model?We do not15 normalizetheCPVembeddings. Toteaseaparttheeffects16 of normalization, we have added a comparison to non-17 normalized versions ofTECNet, which are labeled "TE"18 (taskembedding)inTable3and2.19