We thank the reviewers for their detailed and constructive feedback

We thank the reviewers for their detailed and constructive feedback. It is not clear. . . It feels that there is a skip between Sections 2 and 3 . . . RF-softmax method and its analysis) and smoothing the transition from section 2 to section 3. We have motivated the The paper perhaps lacks a discussion on approaches . . . As for [V embu et al., 2009], given ways to generate uniform samples for the set of classes, The notation is not very clear, especially in the appendix. . .