Richard Sutton's "Bitter Lesson" is usually read as a warning against building too much human knowledge into AI systems. Over the long run, the methods that win are not the ones that encode our clever intuition most directly, but the ones that scale: search, learning, and other general methods that can absorb more compute and data. We take a general architecture, expose it to massive data, and train it with a simple self-supervised objective. Language models predict the next token. Vision models reconstruct masked patches, align views, or match teacher representations.

Recent work has established a fundamental trilemma between Byzantine robustness, local differential privacy (LDP), and optimization error in distributed learning. We show that this trilemma does not universally extend to generalization error, but instead depends critically on the privacy regime. Specifically, in the high-noise regime (strong privacy), we prove that increasing privacy reduces the generalization error, i.e., there is no tension between robustness and privacy. In the low-noise regime (weaker privacy), however, the tension between robustness and privacy reappears and increasing privacy indeed degrades generalization. Our theory explains this surprising non-monotonic behavior of the generalization error via matching lower and upper bounds on the algorithmic stability of Byzantine-robust distributed learning under LDP constraints. We corroborate and further analyze these theoretical findings with empirical evaluations.

Three of the most popular methods for training language models to reason look like three different tricks. They are not. All three adjust a single number: standard deviation, reflecting how much a prompt's sampled answers disagree. When such a model is trained, it answers each problem many times, and an automatic checker marks every answer right or wrong. The standard deviation of those marks measures the disagreement: largest when the answers split evenly between right and wrong, and zero when they all agree. Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) divides by this number, GRPO Done Right (Dr. GRPO) drops the division, and Decoupled Clip and Dynamic Sampling Policy Optimization (DAPO) discards the groups where it is zero. Each is presented as its own fix, yet this paper proves they are three settings of one dial. That dial is not cosmetic: for right-or-wrong rewards, the disagreement is exactly the size of the training update, the group-standard-deviation identity. A split group teaches the most, while a unanimous group teaches nothing and falls silent. The same result says which problems deserve the most weight and how many tries each one needs. This paper confirms the intuition on a large real difficulty dataset (Big-Math) and in a controlled training run. What looks like a harmless normalization step is the dial that decides where learning happens and how strongly.

Kornelius Raeth 1 Nicole Ludwig 1 2 Abstractscoring rules distribute the training gradient in proportion to Sample-based generative models are increasingly data density, with no awareness of the decision maker's cost structure. The model's limited capacity is allocated globused for probabilistic forecasting in high-stakes ally, leaving decision-critical regions of the output space decision settings, yet their training objectives are potentially underserved. These models are commonly trained with strictly proper Given a forecast, a decision maker with cost function c(a,y), scoring rules, such as the energy score, which al-of action aand outcome y, selects the action that minimises locate their training signal in proportion to dataexpected cost under the forecast distribution; a point forecast density, with no awareness of where forecast eris insufficient to evaluate this expectation. A good forecast rors are most costly for downstream decisions. Crucially, the energy score objective with a differentiable deci-observed cost of the optimal action is itself a proper scoring sion loss that directly penalises the cost incurredrule (Hartline et al., 2025; Kleinberg et al., 2023), placing by acting on the model's forecast. This combinedit in the same family as the energy score which licenses loss is theoretically grounded, as the decision losstheir combination as a theoretically well-founded training is itself a proper scoring rule. Introduction score acts as that anchor, preventing the model from collapsing outside cost-sensitive regions. Our method is theo-tion based on a temperature forecast, balancing asset loss against the cost of intervention. In the weather domain, retically grounded and leads to better downstream decisions state-of-the-art forecasting systems (Lang et al., 2024; Pricewhile retaining full probabilistic forecasts, as validated on et al., 2023) are trained with strictly proper scoring rulessynthetic and real-world forecasting tasks. A gradient analysis showing which regions benefitscore reduces to the continuous ranked probability score from the decision loss and why, based on the cost (CRPS), widely used in meteorological forecast verificafunction structure. Both model classes introduced above are commonly trained by minimising strictly proper sion calibration.

Abstractitations, recent work explores online RLHF that iterates between generating on-policy responses and collecting preferences [Lee et al., 2024, Park et al., 2022]. Among online The Self-Improving Alignment (SAIL) algorithmapproaches, SAIL reduces a bilevel alignment formulation addresses distribution shift by reducing a bilevelto a computationally efficient single-level surrogate and formulation of the problem to an efficient, single-reports strong empirical gains [Ding et al., 2024]. Empirically, SAIL has demonstratedisting online pipelines are largely heuristic and do not anastrong performance on this task. However, a for-lytically control the distributional shift induced by iterative mal analysis of its convergence properties has beendata collection [Chakraborty et al., 2024, Shen et al., 2024], lacking. We identify a key theoretical challenge: which has been linked to suboptimal performance in practice the standard SAIL objective function is not guar- [Sharma et al., 2024]. To address this limita-A growing line of work argues that the coupling between tion, we propose a regularized objective, SAILreward learning and policy updates is fundamentally bilevel and should be modeled as such [Chakraborty et al., 2024].RevKL, which incorporates a reverse KullbackAs a follow-up, Ding et al. [2024] reduces the bilevel align-Leibler (KL) divergence penalty to improve the optimization landscape. Our central theoretical con-ment objective to a tractable single-level surrogate and retribution is to prove that this regularized objectiveports strong empirical gains, yet it lacks formal convergence satisfies the Polyak-Lojasiewicz (PL) conditionguarantees. Related theoretical analyses in bilevel/RLHFstyle problems exist [e.g., Yang et al., 2025, Chakrabortywithin a bounded parameter space. We establish et al., 2024, Gaur et al., 2025], yet they either focus onglobal convergence guarantees, achieving a nearlinear sample complexity.

Deep learning problems rarely involve objectives that are equal in importance. A primary objective defines the goal, whilst secondary objectives, such as sparsity, compression, or robustness constrain the solution. While existing multi-objective methods have proven effective in practice, they have a clear symmetry problem and neglect the inherent objective hierarchy built into these objective spaces. We introduce Priority-Constrained Descent (PCD), a gradient-based optimization framework designed to explicitly exploit hierarchical objective structures. PCD preserves the direction of primary descent whilst allowing for the minimal distortion necessary to guarantee progress on secondary objectives, controlled by a single $τ\in [0, 1]$ that dictates the strength of the distortion. The resulting formulation is invariant to objective scaling and admits exact closed-form solutions for problems with two and three objectives. We evaluate PCD within structured network compression settings, unstructured sparsity and low-rankness, and across a variety of synthetic experiments, showing Pareto dominance and better per-objective performance with secondary progress guarantees over existing methods, further exhibiting the interpretable trade-off that $τ$ provides.

A deep network's loss is invariant to continuous symmetries of its parameters: the logit shift, the ReLU rescaling, the LayerNorm scale, the per-head attention rotation. Adam's per-coordinate preconditioner drifts along each symmetry orbit, which pulls the trajectory off the symmetry quotient where the optimization lives and blurs the singular-learning rate the quotient makes readable. We build DDC, a Dead-Direction Conditioner that lifts a base optimizer into a $G$-equivariant one: it conditions the optimizer's state in the orbit decomposition of a $G$-invariant metric, so the trajectory stays a preconditioned gradient flow on the quotient $\barΘ= Θ/G$. The construction carries four architectural gauges (cross-entropy shift, ReLU and SwiGLU rescaling, LayerNorm and RMSNorm scale, and a per-head $O(d_{\rm head})$ attention rotation matched to RoPE), proves exactly equivariant on an Adam base, and composes with a Muon base through a gauge-equivariant orthogonaliser. Respecting the symmetry changes both the minimum the optimizer reaches and what it leaves measurable there. On a language model trained past the point of fit, DDCAdam resists the over-training collapse AdamW falls into, holding a validation-train loss gap of 0.67 against 5.88, and reads the dead-direction rate in 32 of 65 layer-by-observable cells where AdamW reads it in 7. A vision transformer trained from scratch reaches lower validation loss (1.71 against 2.12) while compressing spare feed-forward capacity a matched AdamW leaves intact. On a Muon base, where the rotation gauge composes exactly, DDCMuon groks ten of eleven seeds at depth 24 that a plain Muon never reaches. Built into the optimizer, a network's gauge symmetry sharpens the minimum it finds and turns that minimum's geometry into something the trajectory can measure.

Contrastive embedding models trained with scale-invariant losses are typically paired with distance metrics like cosine similarity, effectively ignoring embedding magnitudes. However, surprisingly, empirical studies reveal that despite this, these "discarded" norms seem to correlate with semantic properties such as concept specificity, token frequency, and human uncertainty. In this work, we provide a formal theoretical framework explaining this phenomenon. By analyzing the optimization dynamics, we derive an analytic formula demonstrating that embedding length naturally encodes this information as a byproduct of the training process. We also show how this gives rise to signals that can serve as "free" calibration tools in specific models and retrieval tasks, providing a grounded explanation for a previously heuristic observation.

We study the leading-order fluctuation of stochastic gradient Euler-Maruyama estimators for generalized non-reversible Langevin dynamics. Under structural assumptions tailored to the small-stepsize central limit theorem and under an unbiased stochastic gradient oracle, we prove that the empirical average over a horizon of order the inverse squared stepsize satisfies a central limit theorem in the vanishing-stepsize regime. The limiting variance is characterized through the Poisson equation of the limiting full-gradient diffusion. We then rewrite this constant in an operator form that links it to the continuous-time asymptotic variance and, under standard operator-theoretic assumptions, derive a sufficient condition under which an anti-symmetric perturbation strictly reduces the leading-order fluctuation constant relative to the reversible baseline. We also identify bounded smooth predictive observables that re directly covered by the main theorem. As a separate Gaussian calculation beyond the bounded-test-function regime, we obtain closed-form formulas for quadratic Hamiltonians and linear observables. The framework covers non-reversible Langevin dynamics and augmented-state examples including Hessian-free high-resolution dynamics and a positive-definite subclass of gradient-adjusted underdamped Langevin dynamics that allow stochastic gradients. Numerical experiments on basic examples and Bayesian linear regression using synthetic data, and Bayesian logistic regression using real data support the predicted Gaussian fluctuations and show that the non-reversible schemes consistently reduce the root mean squared error (RMSE) relative to their reversible baselines.

Gradient boosting in the form of decision tree ensembles has successfully been applied to a variety of problems using simple objective functions based on log-likelihoods of a single variable. The concept extends naturally to objective functions operating on vectors - for example, multinomial logistic log-likelihood for multi-class classification, where observations have a score for each class - but popular frameworks approach these functions by either updating one value of the input vectors at a time, or by using a diagonal upper bound on the second derivative. This work extends the usual gradient boosting framework to functions of vector inputs and sketches a simple algorithm that can be used efficiently with histogram-based decision trees.