Tailoring: encoding inductive biases by optimizing unsupervised objectives at prediction time

From CNNs to attention mechanisms, encoding inductive biases into neural networks has been a fruitful source of improvement in machine learning. Auxiliary losses are a general way of encoding biases in order to help networks learn better representations by adding extra terms to the loss function. However, since they are minimized on the training data, they suffer from the same generalization gap as regular task losses. Moreover, by changing the loss function, the network is optimizing a different objective than the one we care about. In this work we solve both problems: first, we take inspiration from transductive learning and note that, after receiving an input but before making a prediction, we can fine-tune our models on any unsupervised objective. We call this process tailoring, because we customize the model to each input. Second, we formulate a nested optimization (similar to those in meta-learning) and train our models to perform well on the task loss after adapting to the tailoring loss. The advantages of tailoring and meta-tailoring are discussed theoretically and demonstrated empirically on several diverse examples: encoding inductive conservation laws from physics to improve predictions, improving local smoothness to increase robustness to adversarial examples, and using contrastive losses on the query image to improve generalization. The key to successful generalization in machine learning is the encoding of useful inductive biases. A variety of mechanisms, from parameter tying to data augmentation, have proven useful but there is no systematic strategy for designing and implementing these biases. Auxiliary losses are a paradigm for encoding a wide variety of biases, constraints and objectives, helping networks learn better representations and generalize more broadly.