PDDL 2.1: Representation vs. Computation

Journal of Arti ial In telligen e Resear h 20 (2003) 139-144 Submitted 09/03; published 12/03 Commentary PDDL 2.1: Represen tation vs. Computation H e tor Gener he tor.geffner ICREA { Universitat Pomp eu F abr a Pase o de Cir unvala ion 8 08003 Bar elona, Sp ain Abstra t I ommen t on the PDDL 2.1 language and its use in the planning omp etition, fo using on the hoi es made for a ommo dating time and on urren y . I also dis uss some metho d-ologi al issues that ha v e to do with the mo v e to w ard more expressiv e planning languages and the balan e needed in planning resear h b et w een seman ti s and omputation. In tro du tion F o x and Long should b e thank ed and ongratulated for their eort in organizing and running the 3rd In ternational Planning Comp etition. They ame up with an extended planning language along with a n um b er of new problems and domains that hallenged existing planners and will ertainly hallenge future planners as w ell.