Enhancing Forex Forecasting Accuracy: The Impact of Hybrid Variable Sets in Cognitive Algorithmic Trading Systems

The question whether algorithmic trading systems (ATS) can improve human trading in terms of effectiveness is eliciting an increasingly relevant debate among traders and investors, as well as quantitative studies that address this issue through numerical testing [[9]]. In recent years, the discussion regarding whether algorithmic trading systems (ATS) can surpass human traders in terms of efficiency, consistency, and adaptability has gained significant traction in both academic and professional circles. Empirical evidence indicates that algorithmic strategies tend to exhibit superior performance in volatile or declining markets, whereas human-managed funds may retain a relative advantage during upward market trends due to behavioral and intuitive factors [[2]]. Moreover, large-scale behavioral studies reveal that algorithms largely eliminate well-known cognitive biases such as the disposition effect that continue to affect human traders [[23]]. Complementary research has also emphasized the growing integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning methods in modern ATS, which enhances predictive accuracy and execution speed [[7]]. Nonetheless, experimental findings suggest that algorithmic trading may still be constrained by design limitations, challenging the notion of its absolute superiority over human decision-making [[16]]. These findings collectively indicate that algorithmic and human trading approaches might be best viewed as complementary, each offering unique strengths under different market conditions.