Reinforcement of Explainability of ChatGPT Prompts by Embedding Breast Cancer Self-Screening Rules into AI Responses

This serves the purpose A. Structured Use Case Analysis of making sure we have control over the input to the engine vs using the default behavior The results in Figure 2 reveal that, for the of the main ChatGPT engine; (2)Supervisedprompt 50 structured use cases, there were a total where we encode the rules one at a of 47 cases where only 1 rule was triggered, time, to train the ChatGPT engine to process while 3 cases had zero rules triggered (seen and made a decision based on a given use case in the N-Rule(s) Triggered). Regarding the to also be entered; (3) the expectation of this recommendations, 47 cases produced correct supervised prompt is to force explanation of recommendations, while 3 cases received incorrect the recommendations made by the rules upon recommendations as shown in Table I. firing which is the premise of this work; (4) It is noteworthy to mention that the 3 cases the actual encoding of the prompt performing with incorrect recommendations does not correlate the task of supervised prompt-engineering can at all with the 3 cases that had 0 rules be captured algorithmically in Algorithm 3: triggered.