An Empirical Study into Clustering of Unseen Datasets with Self-Supervised Encoders
Lowe, Scott C., Haurum, Joakim Bruslund, Oore, Sageev, Moeslund, Thomas B., Taylor, Graham W.
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Self-supervised learning (SSL) has attracted great interest in recent years across almost every machine learning sub-field, due to the promise of being able to harness large quantities of unlabelled data and obtaining generic feature embeddings useful for a variety of downstream tasks (Balestriero et al., 2023). This has, for example, led to the development of impressive large language models (Brown et al., 2020) and computer vision systems trained on 1 billion images (Goyal et al., 2021). However, while the embeddings from an SSL-trained encoder can perform well on downstream tasks after fine-tuning the network, there has been less investigation into the utility of the embeddings without fine-tuning. Prior work (Vaze et al., 2022; Zhou and Zhang, 2022) suggests SSL feature encoders generate embeddings suitable for clustering, but nonetheless adjust the feature encoders through fine-tuning. Yet, widespread interest in the application of large pretrained models on custom datasets, combined with prohibitive cost of compute, make this question important and increasingly urgent. We find that to date there has been no investigation into whether SSL-trained feature encoders can serve as a foundation for clustering, yielding informative groupings of embeddings on real-world datasets that were totally unseen to the encoder during its training. Vaze et al. (2023) showed that features from SSL encoders are typically biased toward shape features and not color, texture, or count when clustered using K-Means. However, this was conducted using a synthetic dataset, where very specific object attributes could be disentangled.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Jun-4-2024
- Country:
- North America > Canada > Ontario > Toronto (0.14)
- Genre:
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Industry:
- Health & Medicine > Therapeutic Area > Oncology (0.92)
- Technology:
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence
- Machine Learning
- Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.67)
- Statistical Learning > Clustering (1.00)
- Natural Language (1.00)
- Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Vision (1.00)
- Machine Learning
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence