Towards Reliable LLM Evaluation: Correcting the Winner's Curse in Adaptive Benchmarking

Adaptive prompt and program search makes LLM evaluation selection-sensitive. Once benchmark items are reused inside tuning, the observed winner's score need not estimate the fresh-data performance of the full tune-then-deploy procedure. We study inference for this procedure-level target under explicit tuning budgets. We propose SIREN, a selection-aware repeated-split reporting protocol that freezes the post-search shortlist, separates splitwise selection from held-out evaluation, and uses an item-level Gaussian multiplier bootstrap for uncertainty quantification. In a fixed-shortlist regime with smooth stabilized selection, the estimator admits a first-order item-level representation, and the bootstrap yields valid simultaneous inference on a finite budget grid. This supports confidence intervals for procedureperformance curves and pre-specified equal-budget and cross-budget comparisons. Controlled simulations and MMLU-Pro tuning experiments show that winnerbased reporting can be optimistic and can change deployment conclusions, while SIREN remains close to the finite-sample reporting target. Codes are available at https://github.com/jznmsl/siren.