By an extension of statistical mechanics methods, we obtain exact results for the time-dependent generalization error of a linear network with a large number of weights N. We find, for example, that for small training sets of size p N, larger learning rates can be used without compromising asymptotic generalization performance or convergence speed. Encouragingly, for optimal settings of TJ (and, less importantly, weight decay,\) at given final learning time, the generalization performance of online learning is essentially as good as that of offline learning.

An adaptive online algorithm extending the learning of learning idea is proposed and theoretically motivated. Relying only on gradient flow information it can be applied to learning continuous functions or distributions, even when no explicit loss function is given and the Hessian is not available. Its efficiency is demonstrated for a non-stationary blind separation task of acoustic signals.

Stochastic (online) learning can be faster than batch learning. However, at late times, the learning rate must be annealed to remove the noise present in the stochastic weight updates. In this annealing phase, the convergence rate (in mean square) is at best proportional to l/T where T is the number of input presentations. An alternative is to increase the batch size to remove the noise. In this paper we explore convergence for LMS using 1) small but fixed batch sizes and 2) an adaptive batch size. We show that the best adaptive batch schedule is exponential and has a rate of convergence which is the same as for annealing, Le., at best proportional to l/T.

By an extension of statistical mechanics methods, we obtain exact results for the time-dependent generalization error of a linear network with a large number of weights N. We find, for example, that for small training sets of size p N, larger learning rates can be used without compromising asymptotic generalization performance or convergence speed. Encouragingly, for optimal settings of TJ (and, less importantly, weight decay,\) at given final learning time, the generalization performance of online learning is essentially as good as that of offline learning.

Stochastic (online) learning can be faster than batch learning. However, at late times, the learning rate must be annealed to remove the noise present in the stochastic weight updates. In this annealing phase, the convergence rate (in mean square) is at best proportional to l/T where T is the number of input presentations. An alternative is to increase the batch size to remove the noise. In this paper we explore convergence for LMS using 1) small but fixed batch sizes and 2) an adaptive batch size. We show that the best adaptive batch schedule is exponential and has a rate of convergence which is the same as for annealing, Le., at best proportional to l/T.

An adaptive online algorithm extending the learning of learning idea is proposed and theoretically motivated. Relying only on gradient flow information it can be applied to learning continuous functions or distributions, even when no explicit loss function is given and the Hessian is not available. Its efficiency is demonstrated for a non-stationary blind separation task of acoustic signals.

An adaptive online algorithm extending the learning of learning idea is proposed and theoretically motivated. Relying only on gradient flowinformation it can be applied to learning continuous functions or distributions, even when no explicit loss function is given andthe Hessian is not available. Its efficiency is demonstrated for a non-stationary blind separation task of acoustic signals. 1 Introduction Neural networks provide powerful tools to capture the structure in data by learning. Often the batch learning paradigm is assumed, where the learner is given all training examplessimultaneously and allowed to use them as often as desired. In large practical applications batch learning is often experienced to be rather infeasible and instead online learning is employed.

Stochastic (online) learning can be faster than batch learning. However, at late times, the learning rate must be annealed to remove thenoise present in the stochastic weight updates. In this annealing phase, the convergence rate (in mean square) is at best proportional to l/T where T is the number of input presentations. An alternative is to increase the batch size to remove the noise. In this paper we explore convergence for LMS using 1) small but fixed batch sizes and 2) an adaptive batch size. We show that the best adaptive batch schedule is exponential and has a rate of convergence whichis the same as for annealing, Le., at best proportional to l/T. 1 Introduction Stochastic (online) learning can speed learning over its batch training particularly,,,,hen data sets are large and contain redundant information [M0l93J. However, at late times in learning, noise present in the weight updates prevents complete convergence fromtaking place. To reduce the noise, the learning rate is slowly decreased (annealed{ at late times. The optimal annealing schedule is asymptotically proportional toT where t is the iteration [GoI87, L093, Orr95J.

By an extension of statistical mechanics methods, we obtain exact results for the time-dependent generalization error of a linear network with a large number of weights N. We find, for example, that for small training sets of size p N, larger learning rates can be used without compromising asymptotic generalization performance or convergence speed. Encouragingly, for optimal settings of TJ (and, less importantly, weight decay,\) at given final learning time, the generalization performance ofonline learning is essentially as good as that of offline learning.

This research has been motivated by the dominance of the suboptimal symmetric phase in online learning of two-layer feedforward networks trained by gradient descent [2]. This trapping is emphasized for inappropriate small learning rates but exists in all training scenarios, effecting the learning process considerably. We Adaptive Back-Propagation in Online Learning of Multilayer Networks 329 proposed an adaptive back-propagation training algorithm [Eq.