Energy-based models (EBMs) are powerful probabilistic models, but suffer from intractable sampling and density evaluation due to the partition function. As a result, inference in EBMs relies on approximate sampling algorithms, leading to a mismatch between the model and inference. Motivated by this, we consider the sampler-induced distribution as the model of interest and maximize the likelihood of this model. This yields a class of energy-inspired models (EIMs) that incorporate learned energy functions while still providing exact samples and tractable log-likelihood lower bounds. We describe and evaluate three instantiations of such models based on truncated rejection sampling, self-normalized importance sampling, and Hamiltonian importance sampling. These models outperform or perform comparably to the recently proposed Learned Accept/Reject Sampling algorithm and provide new insights on ranking Noise Contrastive Estimation and Contrastive Predictive Coding. Moreover, EIMs allow us to generalize a recent connection between multi-sample variational lower bounds and auxiliary variable variational inference. We show how recent variational bounds can be unified with EIMs as the variational family.

Black Box Machine Learning models leak information about the proprietary model parameters and architecture, both through side channels and output predictions. An adversary can thus, exploit this leakage to reconstruct a substitute architecture similar to the target model, violating the model privacy and Intellectual Property. However, all such attacks, infer a subset of the target model attributes and identifying the rest of the architecture and parameters (optimally) is a search problem. Extracting the exact target model is not possible owing to the uncertainty in the inference attack outputs and stochastic nature of the training process. In this work, we propose a probabilistic framework, Airavata, to estimate the leakage in such model extraction attacks. Specifically, we use Bayesian Networks to capture the uncertainty, under the subjective notion of probability, in estimating the target model attributes using various model extraction attacks. We experimentally validate the model under different adversary assumptions commonly adopted by various model extraction attacks to reason about the attack efficacy. Further, this provides a practical approach of inferring actionable knowledge about extracting black box models and identify the best combination of attacks which maximise the knowledge extracted (information leaked) from the target model.

W e argue the case for Gaussian Belief Propagation (GBP) as a strong algorithmic framework for the distributed, generic and incremental probabilistic estimation we need in Spatial AI as we aim at high performance smart robots and devices which operate within the constraints of real products. Processor hardware is changing rapidly, and GBP has the right character to take advantage of highly distributed processing and storage while estimating global quantities, as well as great flexibility. W e present a detailed tutorial on GBP, relating to the standard factor graph formulation used in robotics and computer vision, and give several simulation examples with code which demonstrate its properties.

Regularization methods, specifically those which directly alter weights like $L_1$ and $L_2$, are an integral part of many learning algorithms. Both the regularizers mentioned above are formulated by assuming certain priors in the parameter space and these assumptions, in some cases, induce sparsity in the parameter space. Regularizers help in transferring beliefs one has on the dataset or the parameter space by introducing adequate terms in the loss function. Any kind of formulation represents a specific set of beliefs: $L_1$ regularization conveys that the parameter space should be sparse whereas $L_2$ regularization conveys that the parameter space should be bounded and continuous. These regularizers in turn leverage certain priors to express these inherent beliefs. A better understanding of how the prior affects the behavior of the parameters and how the priors can be updated based on the dataset can contribute greatly in improving the generalization capabilities of a function estimator. In this work, we introduce a weakly informative prior and then further extend it to an informative prior in order to formulate a regularization penalty, which shows better results in terms of inducing sparsity experimentally, when compared to regularizers based only on Gaussian and Laplacian priors. Experimentally, we verify that a regularizer based on an adapted prior improves the generalization capabilities of any network. We illustrate the performance of the proposed method on the MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets.

Bayesian inference in state-space models is challenging due to high-dimensional state trajectories. A viable approach is particle Markov chain Monte Carlo, combining MCMC and sequential Monte Carlo to form "exact approximations" to otherwise intractable MCMC methods. The performance of the approximation is limited to that of the exact method. We focus on particle Gibbs and particle Gibbs with ancestor sampling, improving their performance beyond that of the underlying Gibbs sampler (which they approximate) by marginalizing out one or more parameters. This is possible when the parameter prior is conjugate to the complete data likelihood. Marginalization yields a non-Markovian model for inference, but we show that, in contrast to the general case, this method still scales linearly in time. While marginalization can be cumbersome to implement, recent advances in probabilistic programming have enabled its automation. We demonstrate how the marginalized methods are viable as efficient inference backends in probabilistic programming, and demonstrate with examples in ecology and epidemiology.

Causal inference can be formalized as Bayesian inference that combines a prior distribution over causal models and likelihoods that account for both observations and interventions. We show that it is possible to implement this approach using a sufficiently expressive probabilistic programming language. Priors are represented using probabilistic programs that generate source code in a domain specific language. Interventions are represented using probabilistic programs that edit this source code to modify the original generative process. This approach makes it straightforward to incorporate data from atomic interventions, as well as shift interventions, variance-scaling interventions, and other interventions that modify causal structure. This approach also enables the use of general-purpose inference machinery for probabilistic programs to infer probable causal structures and parameters from data. This abstract describes a prototype of this approach in the Gen probabilistic programming language.

-- Mammography is often used as the most common laboratory method for the detection of breast cancer, yet associated with the high cost and many side effects. M achine learning prediction as an alternative method has shown promising results. This paper present s a method based on a mul tilayer fuzzy expert system for the detection of breast cancer using an e xtreme learning machine (ELM) classification model integrated with radial basis function (RBF) kernel called ELM - RBF, considering the Wisconsin dataset . The performance of the propose d model is further compared with a l inear - SVM model. Furthermore, both models are studied in terms of criteria of accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, validation, true positive rate (TPR), and false - negative rate (FNR). The ELM - RBF model for these criteria presents better performance compared to the SVM model . Breast cancer is among the most common disease of young women over the world [1 - 3]. Approximately 29.9% of mortality from can cer in women is due to breast cancer. The incidence of this disease is lower in developing countries than in developed countries, about 10% of women with breast cancer in Western countries.

We introduce the Convolutional Conditional Neural Process (ConvCNP), a new member of the Neural Process family that models translation equivariance in the data. Translation equivariance is an important inductive bias for many learning problems including time series modelling, spatial data, and images. The model embeds data sets into an infinite-dimensional function space as opposed to a finite-dimensional vector space. To formalize this notion, we extend the theory of neural representations of sets to include functional representations, and demonstrate that any translation-equivariant embedding can be represented using a convolutional deep set. We evaluate ConvCNPs in several settings, demonstrating that they achieve state-of-the-art performance compared to existing NPs. We demonstrate that building in translation equivariance enables zero-shot generalization to challenging, out-of-domain tasks.

Interpretability is an elusive but highly sought-after characteristic of modern machine learning methods. Recent work has focused on interpretability via $\textit{explanations}$, which justify individual model predictions. In this work, we take a step towards reconciling machine explanations with those that humans produce and prefer by taking inspiration from the study of explanation in philosophy, cognitive science, and the social sciences. We identify key aspects in which these human explanations differ from current machine explanations, distill them into a list of desiderata, and formalize them into a framework via the notion of $\textit{weight of evidence}$ from information theory. Finally, we instantiate this framework in two simple applications and show it produces intuitive and comprehensible explanations.

We discuss promising recent contributions on quantifying feature relevance using Shapley values, where we observed some confusion on which probability distribution is the right one for dropped features. We argue that the confusion is based on not carefully distinguishing between observational and interventional conditional probabilities and try a clarification based on Pearl's seminal work on causality. We conclude that unconditional rather than conditional expectations provide the right notion of dropping features in contradiction to the theoretical justification of the software package SHAP . Parts of SHAP are unaffected because unconditional expectations (which we argue to be conceptually right) are used as approximation for the conditional ones, which encouraged others to'improve' SHAP in a way that we believe to be flawed. Further, our criticism concerns TreeExplainer in SHAP, which really uses conditional expectations (without approximating them by unconditional ones).