Bayesian quadrature (BQ) is a method for solving numerical integration problems in a Bayesian manner, which allows users to quantify their uncertainty about the solution. The standard approach to BQ is based on a Gaussian process (GP) approximation of the integrand. As a result, BQ is inherently limited to cases where GP approximations can be done in an efficient manner, thus often prohibiting very high-dimensional or non-smooth target functions. This paper proposes to tackle this issue with a new Bayesian numerical integration algorithm based on Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART) priors, which we call BART-Int. BART priors are easy to tune and well-suited for discontinuous functions. We demonstrate that they also lend themselves naturally to a sequential design setting and that explicit convergence rates can be obtained in a variety of settings. The advantages and disadvantages of this new methodology are highlighted on a set of benchmark tests including the Genz functions, and on a Bayesian survey design problem.

Estimating epistemic uncertainty of models used in low-latency applications and Out-Of-Distribution samples detection is a challenge due to the computationally demanding nature of uncertainty estimation techniques. Estimating model uncertainty using approximation techniques like Monte Carlo Dropout (MCD), DropConnect (MCDC) requires a large number of forward passes through the network, rendering them inapt for low-latency applications. We propose Select-DC which uses a subset of layers in a neural network to model epistemic uncertainty with MCDC. Through our experiments, we show a significant reduction in the GFLOPS required to model uncertainty, compared to Monte Carlo DropConnect, with marginal trade-off in performance. We perform a suite of experiments on CIFAR 10, CIFAR 100, and SVHN datasets with ResNet and VGG models. We further show how applying DropConnect to various layers in the network with different drop probabilities affects the networks performance and the entropy of the predictive distribution.

Large-scale numerical simulations are used across many scientific disciplines to facilitate experimental development and provide insights into underlying physical processes, but they come with a significant computational cost. Deep neural networks (DNNs) can serve as highly-accurate surrogate models, with the capacity to handle diverse datatypes, offering tremendous speed-ups for prediction and many other downstream tasks. An important use-case for these surrogates is the comparison between simulations and experiments; prediction uncertainty estimates are crucial for making such comparisons meaningful, yet standard DNNs do not provide them. In this work we define the fundamental requirements for a DNN to be useful for scientific applications, and demonstrate a general variational inference approach to equip predictions of scalar and image data from a DNN surrogate model trained on inertial confinement fusion simulations with calibrated Bayesian uncertainties. Critically, these uncertainties are interpretable, meaningful and preserve physics-correlations in the predicted quantities.

Models of discrete-valued outcomes are easily misspecified if the data exhibit zero-inflation, overdispersion or contamination. Without additional knowledge about the existence and nature of this misspecification, model inference and prediction are adversely affected. Here, we introduce a robust discrepancy-based Bayesian approach using the Total Variation Distance (TVD). In the process, we address and resolve two challenges: First, we study convergence and robustness properties of a computationally efficient estimator for the TVD between a parametric model and the data-generating mechanism. Second, we provide an efficient inference method adapted from Lyddon et al. (2019) which corresponds to formulating an uninformative nonparametric prior directly over the data-generating mechanism. Lastly, we empirically demonstrate that our approach is robust and significantly improves predictive performance on a range of simulated and real world data.

Purpose: Bayesian calibration is theoretically superior to standard direct-search algorithm because it can reveal the full joint posterior distribution of the calibrated parameters. However, to date, Bayesian calibration has not been used often in health decision sciences due to practical and computational burdens. In this paper we propose to use artificial neural networks (ANN) as one solution to these limitations. Methods: Bayesian Calibration using Artificial Neural Networks (BayCANN) involves (1) training an ANN metamodel on a sample of model inputs and outputs, and (2) then calibrating the trained ANN metamodel instead of the full model in a probabilistic programming language to obtain the posterior joint distribution of the calibrated parameters. We demonstrate BayCANN by calibrating a natural history model of colorectal cancer to adenoma prevalence and cancer incidence data. In addition, we compare the efficiency and accuracy of BayCANN against performing a Bayesian calibration directly on the simulation model using an incremental mixture importance sampling (IMIS) algorithm. Results: BayCANN was generally more accurate than IMIS in recovering the "true" parameter values. The ratio of the absolute ANN deviation from the truth compared to IMIS for eight out of the nine calibrated parameters were less than one indicating that BayCANN was more accurate than IMIS. In addition, BayCANN took about 15 minutes total compared to the IMIS method which took 80 minutes. Conclusions: In our case study, BayCANN was more accurate than IMIS and was five-folds faster. Because BayCANN does not depend on the structure of the simulation model, it can be adapted to models of various levels of complexity with minor changes to its structure. We provide BayCANN's open-source implementation in R.

Federated learning aims to collaboratively train a strong global model by accessing users' locally trained models but not their own data. A crucial step is therefore to aggregate local models into a global model, which has been shown challenging when users have non-i.i.d. data. In this paper, we propose a novel aggregation algorithm named FedBE, which takes a Bayesian inference perspective by sampling higher-quality global models and combining them via Bayesian model Ensemble, leading to much robust aggregation. We show that an effective model distribution can be constructed by simply fitting a Gaussian or Dirichlet distribution to the local models. Our empirical studies validate FedBE's superior performance, especially when users' data are not i.i.d. and when the neural networks go deeper. Moreover, FedBE is compatible with recent efforts in regularizing users' model training, making it an easily applicable module: you only need to replace the aggregation method but leave other parts of your federated learning algorithm intact.

We introduce a new theoretical framework to analyze deep learning optimization with connection to its generalization error. Existing frameworks such as mean field theory and neural tangent kernel theory for neural network optimization analysis typically require taking limit of infinite width of the network to show its global convergence. This potentially makes it difficult to directly deal with finite width network; especially in the neural tangent kernel regime, we cannot reveal favorable properties of neural networks beyond kernel methods. To realize more natural analysis, we consider a completely different approach in which we formulate the parameter training as a transportation map estimation and show its global convergence via the theory of the infinite dimensional Langevin dynamics. This enables us to analyze narrow and wide networks in a unifying manner. Moreover, we give generalization gap and excess risk bounds for the solution obtained by the dynamics. The excess risk bound achieves the so-called fast learning rate. In particular, we show an exponential convergence for a classification problem and a minimax optimal rate for a regression problem.

The dominant term in PAC-Bayes bounds is often the Kullback--Leibler divergence between the posterior and prior. For so-called linear PAC-Bayes risk bounds based on the empirical risk of a fixed posterior kernel, it is possible to minimize the expected value of the bound by choosing the prior to be the expected posterior, which we call the oracle prior on the account that it is distribution dependent. In this work, we show that the bound based on the oracle prior can be suboptimal: In some cases, a stronger bound is obtained by using a data-dependent oracle prior, i.e., a conditional expectation of the posterior, given a subset of the training data that is then excluded from the empirical risk term. While using data to learn a prior is a known heuristic, its essential role in optimal bounds is new. In fact, we show that using data can mean the difference between vacuous and nonvacuous bounds. We apply this new principle in the setting of nonconvex learning, simulating data-dependent oracle priors on MNIST and Fashion MNIST with and without held-out data, and demonstrating new nonvacuous bounds in both cases.

In the following, we assume to have access to a differential equation system Neural Stochastic Differential Equations that describes the dynamics of the target environment model a dynamical environment with neural with low fidelity, e.g. by describing the vector field on nets assigned to their drift and diffusion a reduced dimensionality, by ignoring detailed models terms. The high expressive power of their of some system components, or by avoiding certain nonlinearity comes at the expense of instability dependencies for computational feasibility. We incorporate in the identification of the large set of free the ODE system provided by the domain expert parameters. This paper presents a recipe to into a nonlinear system identification engine, which we improve the prediction accuracy of such models choose to be a Bayesian Neural Stochastic Differential in three steps: i) accounting for epistemic Equation (BNSDE) to cover a large scope of dynamical uncertainty by assuming probabilistic weights, systems, resulting in a hybrid model.

Bayesian optimization forms a set of powerful tools that allows efficient black-box optimization and has been applied in a large variety of fields. In this thesis we first seek to advance Bayesian optimization by using estimated derivative observations. Later, we seek to tackle down the issues in Bayesian optimization when a large number of derivative observations and/or function observations are present. We start to describe our motivations in Chapter 1. We then give a broad review of Bayesian optimization in Chapter 2, where we start by covering the history of Bayesian optimization and its components.