Model-Based Anomaly Detection has been a successful approach to identify deviations from the expected behavior of Cyber-Physical Production Systems. Since manual creation of these models is a time-consuming process, it is advantageous to learn them from data and represent them in a generic formalism like timed automata. However, these models - and by extension, the detected anomalies - can be challenging to interpret due to a lack of additional information about the system. This paper aims to improve model-based anomaly detection in CPPS by combining the learned timed automaton with a formal knowledge graph about the system. Both the model and the detected anomalies are described in the knowledge graph in order to allow operators an easier interpretation of the model and the detected anomalies. The authors additionally propose an ontology of the necessary concepts. The approach was validated on a five-tank mixing CPPS and was able to formally define both automata model as well as timing anomalies in automata execution.

Knowledge Graph Embedding (KGE) models are used to learn continuous representations of entities and relations. A key task in the literature is predicting missing links between entities. However, Knowledge Graphs are not just sets of links but also have semantics underlying their structure. Semantics is crucial in several downstream tasks, such as query answering or reasoning. We introduce the subgraph inference task, where a model has to generate likely and semantically valid subgraphs. We propose IntelliGraphs, a set of five new Knowledge Graph datasets. The IntelliGraphs datasets contain subgraphs with semantics expressed in logical rules for evaluating subgraph inference. We also present the dataset generator that produced the synthetic datasets. We designed four novel baseline models, which include three models based on traditional KGEs. We evaluate their expressiveness and show that these models cannot capture the semantics. We believe this benchmark will encourage the development of machine learning models that emphasize semantic understanding.

Healthcare knowledge graphs (HKGs) have emerged as a promising tool for organizing medical knowledge in a structured and interpretable way, which provides a comprehensive view of medical concepts and their relationships. However, challenges such as data heterogeneity and limited coverage remain, emphasizing the need for further research in the field of HKGs. This survey paper serves as the first comprehensive overview of HKGs. We summarize the pipeline and key techniques for HKG construction (i.e., from scratch and through integration), as well as the common utilization approaches (i.e., model-free and model-based). To provide researchers with valuable resources, we organize existing HKGs (The resource is available at https://github.com/lujiaying/Awesome-HealthCare-KnowledgeBase) based on the data types they capture and application domains, supplemented with pertinent statistical information. In the application section, we delve into the transformative impact of HKGs across various healthcare domains, spanning from fine-grained basic science research to high-level clinical decision support. Lastly, we shed light on the opportunities for creating comprehensive and accurate HKGs in the era of large language models, presenting the potential to revolutionize healthcare delivery and enhance the interpretability and reliability of clinical prediction.

A scientific paper can be divided into two major constructs which are Metadata and Full-body text. Metadata provides a brief overview of the paper while the Full-body text contains key-insights that can be valuable to fellow researchers. To retrieve metadata and key-insights from scientific papers, knowledge acquisition is a central activity. It consists of gathering, analyzing and organizing knowledge embedded in scientific papers in such a way that it can be used and reused whenever needed. Given the wealth of scientific literature, manual knowledge acquisition is a cumbersome task. Thus, computer-assisted and (semi-)automatic strategies are generally adopted. Our purpose in this research was two fold: curate Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG) with papers related to ontology learning and define an approach using ORKG as a computer-assisted tool to organize key-insights extracted from research papers. This approach was used to document the "epidemiological surveillance systems design and implementation" research problem and to prepare the related work of this paper. It is currently used to document "food information engineering", "Tabular data to Knowledge Graph Matching" and "Question Answering" research problems and "Neuro-symbolic AI" domain.

Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs We propose an approach that utilizes LLMs to represent (KGQA) poses significant challenges in the field questions within a specific domain, extracting of Natural Language Processing (NLP). As structured their meanings, while employing logical programming knowledge graphs capturing rich semantic techniques for reasoning and knowledge information become prevalent, there is a pressing representation. Our objective is to demonstrate need for intelligent systems that can reason effectively how this integration enables robust and adaptable and provide accurate answers to intricate KGQA systems that can navigate domain-specific questions within specific domains. The primary knowledge graphs and provide accurate answers to focus of KGQA is to bridge the gap between human complex questions. To evaluate the effectiveness language and structured knowledge representations. of our proposed approach, we conduct experiments When presented with a question in natural using the MetaQA dataset (Zhang et al., 2018), language, KGQA systems aim to traverse the a widely adopted benchmark in KGQA research.

In recent years, countless research papers have addressed the topics of knowledge graph creation, extension, or completion in order to create knowledge graphs that are larger, more correct, or more diverse. This research is typically motivated by the argumentation that using such enhanced knowledge graphs to solve downstream tasks will improve performance. Nonetheless, this is hardly ever evaluated. Instead, the predominant evaluation metrics - aiming at correctness and completeness - are undoubtedly valuable but fail to capture the complete picture, i.e., how useful the created or enhanced knowledge graph actually is. Further, the accessibility of such a knowledge graph is rarely considered (e.g., whether it contains expressive labels, descriptions, and sufficient context information to link textual mentions to the entities of the knowledge graph). To better judge how well knowledge graphs perform on actual tasks, we present KGrEaT - a framework to estimate the quality of knowledge graphs via actual downstream tasks like classification, clustering, or recommendation. Instead of comparing different methods of processing knowledge graphs with respect to a single task, the purpose of KGrEaT is to compare various knowledge graphs as such by evaluating them on a fixed task setup. The framework takes a knowledge graph as input, automatically maps it to the datasets to be evaluated on, and computes performance metrics for the defined tasks. It is built in a modular way to be easily extendable with additional tasks and datasets.

Evaluating semantic relatedness of Web resources is still an open challenge. This paper focuses on knowledge-based methods, which represent an alternative to corpus-based approaches, and rely in general on the availability of knowledge graphs. In particular, we have selected 10 methods from the existing literature, that have been organized according to it adjacent resources, triple patterns, and triple weights-based methods. They have been implemented and evaluated by using DBpedia as reference RDF knowledge graph. Since DBpedia is continuously evolving, the experimental results provided by these methods in the literature are not comparable. For this reason, in this work, such methods have been experimented by running them all at once on the same DBpedia release and against 14 well-known golden datasets. On the basis of the correlation values with human judgment obtained according to the experimental results, weighting the RDF triples in combination with evaluating all the directed paths linking the compared resources is the best strategy in order to compute semantic relatedness in DBpedia.

Interpreting natural language is an increasingly important task in computer algorithms due to the growing availability of unstructured textual data. Natural Language Processing (NLP) applications rely on semantic networks for structured knowledge representation. The fundamental properties of semantic networks must be taken into account when designing NLP algorithms, yet they remain to be structurally investigated. We study the properties of semantic networks from ConceptNet, defined by 7 semantic relations from 11 different languages. We find that semantic networks have universal basic properties: they are sparse, highly clustered, and many exhibit power-law degree distributions. Our findings show that the majority of the considered networks are scale-free. Some networks exhibit language-specific properties determined by grammatical rules, for example networks from highly inflected languages, such as e.g. Latin, German, French and Spanish, show peaks in the degree distribution that deviate from a power law. We find that depending on the semantic relation type and the language, the link formation in semantic networks is guided by different principles. In some networks the connections are similarity-based, while in others the connections are more complementarity-based. Finally, we demonstrate how knowledge of similarity and complementarity in semantic networks can improve NLP algorithms in missing link inference.

Pain is a complex concept that can interconnect with other concepts such as a disorder that might cause pain, a medication that might relieve pain, and so on. To fully understand the context of pain experienced by either an individual or across a population, we may need to examine all concepts related to pain and the relationships between them. This is especially useful when modeling pain that has been recorded in electronic health records. Knowledge graphs represent concepts and their relations by an interlinked network, enabling semantic and context-based reasoning in a computationally tractable form. These graphs can, however, be too large for efficient computation. Knowledge graph embeddings help to resolve this by representing the graphs in a low-dimensional vector space. These embeddings can then be used in various downstream tasks such as classification and link prediction. The various relations associated with pain which are required to construct such a knowledge graph can be obtained from external medical knowledge bases such as SNOMED CT, a hierarchical systematic nomenclature of medical terms. A knowledge graph built in this way could be further enriched with real-world examples of pain and its relations extracted from electronic health records. This paper describes the construction of such knowledge graph embedding models of pain concepts, extracted from the unstructured text of mental health electronic health records, combined with external knowledge created from relations described in SNOMED CT, and their evaluation on a subject-object link prediction task. The performance of the models was compared with other baseline models.

Inductive knowledge graph completion has been considered as the task of predicting missing triplets between new entities that are not observed during training. While most inductive knowledge graph completion methods assume that all entities can be new, they do not allow new relations to appear at inference time. This restriction prohibits the existing methods from appropriately handling real-world knowledge graphs where new entities accompany new relations. In this paper, we propose an INductive knowledge GRAph eMbedding method, InGram, that can generate embeddings of new relations as well as new entities at inference time. Given a knowledge graph, we define a relation graph as a weighted graph consisting of relations and the affinity weights between them. Based on the relation graph and the original knowledge graph, InGram learns how to aggregate neighboring embeddings to generate relation and entity embeddings using an attention mechanism. Experimental results show that InGram outperforms 14 different state-of-the-art methods on varied inductive learning scenarios.