Planning & Scheduling
A Predictive Model for Satisfying Conflicting Objectives in Scheduling Problems
The economic viability of a manufacturing organization depends on its ability to maximize customer services; maintain efficient, low-cost operations; and minimize total investment. These objectives conflict with one another and, thus, are difficult to achieve on an operational basis. Much of the work in the area of automated scheduling systems recognizes this problem but does not address it effectively. The work presented by this Ph.D. dissertation was motivated by the desire to generate good, cost-effective schedules in dynamic and stochastic manufacturing environments.
A Predictive Model for Satisfying Conflicting Objectives in Scheduling Problems
The economic viability of a manufacturing organization depends on its ability to maximize customer services; maintain efficient, low-cost operations; and minimize total investment. These objectives conflict with one another and, thus, are difficult to achieve on an operational basis. Much of the work in the area of automated scheduling systems recognizes this problem but does not address it effectively. The work presented by this Ph.D. dissertation was motivated by the desire to generate good, cost-effective schedules in dynamic and stochastic manufacturing environments.
A Bayesian model of plan recognition
We argue that the problem of plan recognition, inferring an agent's plan from observations, is largely a problem of inference under conditions of uncertainty. We present an approach to the plan recognition problem that is based on Bayesian probability theory. In attempting to solve a plan recognition problem we first retrieve candidate explanations. These explanations (sometimes only the most promising ones) are assembled into a plan recognition Bayesian network, which is a representation of a probability distribution over the set of possible explanations. We perform Bayesian updating to choose the most likely interpretation for the set of observed actions.
Conditional nonlinear planning
"Work-in-progress on the design of a conditional nonlinear planner is described. CNLP is a nonlinear planner that develops plans that account for foreseen uncertainties. CNLP represents an extension of the conditional planning technique of Warren [75] to the domain of nonlinear planning." In ICAPS-92, pp. 189โ197.
Intentions in Communication: A Review
Bratman's definition of intention is papers range from philosophical This review is organized around the jumping-off point for Cohen and analyses of the concept of intention three of the themes that are sounded Levesque's two papers: "Persistence, to algorithms for recognizing plans, in Intentions in Communication: (1) Intention, and Commitment" and from logical formalizations of speech foundational work on intention and "Rational Interaction as the Basis of acts to analyses of intonational contours its relation to speech act theory, (2) Communication."
Classifying and Detecting Plan-Based Misconceptions for Robust Plan Recognition
My Ph.D. dissertation (Calistri 1990) extends traditional methods of plan recognition to handle situations in which agents have flawed plans. This extension involves solving two problems: determining what sorts of mistakes people make when they reason about plans and figuring out how to recognize these mistakes when they occur. I have developed a complete classification of plan-based misconceptions, which categorizes all ways that a plan can fail, and I have developed a probabilistic interpretation of these misconceptions that can be used in principle to guide a best-first search algorithm. I have also developed a program called Pathfinder that embodies a practical implementation of this theory.
Classifying and Detecting Plan-Based Misconceptions for Robust Plan Recognition
My Ph.D. dissertation (Calistri 1990) extends traditional methods of plan recognition to handle situations in which agents have flawed plans. This extension involves solving two problems: determining what sorts of mistakes people make when they reason about plans and figuring out how to recognize these mistakes when they occur. I have developed a complete classification of plan-based misconceptions, which categorizes all ways that a plan can fail, and I have developed a probabilistic interpretation of these misconceptions that can be used in principle to guide a best-first search algorithm. I have also developed a program called Pathfinder that embodies a practical implementation of this theory. Pathfinder is a probability-based plan-recognition.
A Survey of the Eighth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Pulling Together or Pulling Apart?
Fields 3-8 of table 1 of the survey and general results, a discussion represent purposes, specifically, to define of the four hypotheses, and two sections models (field 3), prove theorems about the at the end of the article that contain details of models (field 4), present algorithms (field 5), the survey and statistical analyses. The next analyze algorithms (field 6), present systems section (The Survey) briefly describes the 16 or architectures (field 7), and analyze them substantive questions I asked about each (field 8). These purposes are not mutually paper. One of the closing sections (An Explanation exclusive; for example, many papers that of the Fields in Table 1) discusses the present models also prove theorems about criteria for answering the survey questions the models.