Resource Constrained Project Scheduling Problems with minimum and maximum time lags (RCPSP/max) have been studied extensively in the literature. However, the more realistic RCPSP/max problems — ones where durations of activities are not known with certainty – have received scant interest and hence are the main focus of the paper. Towards addressing the significant computational complexity involved in tackling RCPSP/max with durational uncertainty, we employ a local search mechanism to generate robust schedules. In this regard, we make two key contributions: (a) Introducing and studying the key properties of a new decision rule to specify start times of activities with respect to dynamic realizations of the duration uncertainty; and (b) Deriving the fitness function that is used to guide the local search towards robust schedules. Experimental results show that the performance of local search is improved with the new fitness evaluation over the best known existing approach.

Factored planning methods aim to exploit locality to efficiently solve large but "loosely coupled" planning problems by computing solutions locally and propagating limited information between components. However, all factored planning methods presented so far work with representations that require certain parameters to be bounded (e.g. number of coordination points between local plans considered); the satisfaction of those bounds by a given problem instance is difficult to establish a priori, and the influence of those parameters on the problem complexity is unclear. We present an instance of the factored planning framework using a representation of the (regular) sets of local plans by finite automata, which does not require any such bound. By substituting weighted automata, we can even do factored cost-optimal planning. We test an implementation of the method on the few standard planning benchmarks that we have found to be amenable to factoring. We show that this method runs in polynomial time under conditions similar to those considered in previous work, but not only under those conditions. Thus, what constitutes an essential measure of "factorability" remains obscure.

DAEX is a metaheuristic designed to improve the plan quality and the scalability of an encapsulated planning system. DAEX is based on a state decomposition strategy, driven by an evolutionary algorithm, which benefits from the use of a classical planning heuristic to maintain an ordering of atoms within the individuals. The proof of concept is achieved by embedding the domain-independent satisficing YAHSP planner and using the critical path h1 heuristic. Experiments with the resulting algorithm are performed on a selection of IPC benchmarks from classical, cost-based and temporal domains. Under the experimental conditions of the IPC, and in particular with a universal parameter setting common to all domains, DAEYAHSP is compared to the best planner for each type of domain. Results show that DAEYAHSP performs very well both on coverage and quality metrics. It is particularly noticeable that DAEX improves a lot on plan quality when compared to YAHSP, which is known to provide largely suboptimal solutions; making it competitive with state-of-the-art planners. This article gives a full account of the algorithm, reports on the experiments and provides some insights on the algorithm behavior.

Over the last few years there has been a revival of interest in the idea of least-commitment planning with a number of researchers returning to the partial-order planning approaches of UCPOP and VHPOP. In this paper we explore the potential of a forward-chaining state-based search strategy to support partial-order planning in the solution of temporal-numeric problems. Our planner, POPF, is built on the foundations of grounded forward search, in combination with linear programming to handle continuous linear numeric change. To achieve a partial ordering we delay commitment to ordering decisions, timestamps and the values of numeric parameters, managing sets of constraints as actions are started and ended. In the context of a partially ordered collection of actions, constructing the linear program is complicated and we propose an efficient method for achieving this. Our late-commitment approach achieves flexibility, while benefiting from the informative search control of forward planning, and allows temporal and metric decisions to be made - as is most efficient - by the LP solver rather than by the discrete reasoning of the planner. We compare POPF with the approach of constructing a sequenced plan and then lifting a partial order from it, showing that our approach can offer improvements in terms of makespan, and time to find a solution, in several benchmark domains.

The Simple Temporal Problem (STP) is a popular representation for solving centralized scheduling and planning problems. When scheduling agents are associated with different users who need to coordinate some of their activities, however, considerations such as privacy and scalability suggest solving the joint STP in a more distributed manner. Building on recent advances in STP algorithms that exploit loosely-coupled problem structure, this paper develops and evaluates algorithms for solving the multiagent STP. We define a partitioning of the multiagent STP with provable privacy guarantees, and show that our algorithms can exploit this partitioning while still finding the tightest consistent bounds on timepoints that must be coordinated across agents. We also demonstrate empirically that our algorithms can exploit concurrent computation, leading to solution time speed-ups over state-of-the-art centralized approaches, and enabling scalability to problems involving larger numbers of loosely-coupled agents.

We describe a timeline-based scheduling algorithm developed for mission operations of the EO-1 earth observing satellite. We first describe the range of operational constraints for operations focusing on maneuver and thermal constraints that cannot be modeled in typical planner/schedulers. We then describe a greedy heuristic scheduling algorithm and compare its performance to both the prior scheduling algorithm - documenting an over 50% increase in scenes scheduled with estimated value of millions of dollars US. We also compare to a relaxed optimal scheduler showing that the greedy scheduler produces schedules with scene count within 15% of an upper bound on optimal schedules.

Forward State Planning with Reachability Heuristics is arguably the most successful approach to Automated Planning up to date. In addition to an estimation of the distance to the goal, relaxed plans obtained with such heuristics provide the search with useful information such as helpful actions and look-ahead states. However, this information is extracted only from the beginning of the relaxed plan. In this paper, we propose using information extracted from the last actions in the relaxed plan to generate intermediate goals backwards. This allows us to use information from previous computations of the heuristic and reduce the depth of the search tree.

International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, held in Toronto, Ontario, For ICAPS 2010, we received 113 submissions Canada, May 12-16, 2010. The annual ICAPS from authors of 31 countries, representing all conference series was established in 2003 continents. From these submissions, 79 were through the merger of two preexisting biennial full papers, 29 were short ones, and 5 were position conferences, the International Conference on or challenge papers. These papers were all Artificial Intelligence Planning and Scheduling reviewed by a Program Committee made up of (AIPS) and the European Conference on Planning 76 members, coordinated by 10 Senior Members, (ECP). ICAPS continues the traditional and the four PC Chairs.

On the basis of an analysis of previous research, we present a generalized approach for measuring the difference of plans with an exemplary application to machine scheduling. Our work is motivated by the need for such measures, which are used in dynamic scheduling and planning situations. In this context, quantitative approaches are needed for the assessment of the robustness and stability of schedules. Obviously, any `robustness' or `stability' of plans has to be defined w. r. t. the particular situation and the requirements of the human decision maker. Besides the proposition of an instability measure, we therefore discuss possibilities of obtaining meaningful information from the decision maker for the implementation of the introduced approach.

This paper presents an approach to integrating planning and execution in time-sensitive environments. We present a simple setting in which to consider the issue, that we call continual on-line planning. New goals arrive stochastically during execution, the agent issues actions for execution one at a time, and the environment is otherwise deterministic. We take the objective to be a form of time-dependent partial satisfaction planning reminiscent of discounted MDPs: goals offer reward that decays over time, actions incur fixed costs, and the agent attempts to maximize net utility. We argue that this setting highlights the central challenge of time-aware planning while excluding the complexity of non-deterministic actions. Our approach to this problem is based on real-time heuristic search. We view the two central issues as the decision of which partial plans to elaborate during search and the decision of when to issue an action for execution. We propose an extension of Russell and Wefald's decision-theoretic A* algorithm that can cope with our inadmissible heuristic. Our algorithm, DTOCS, handles the complexities of the on-line setting by balancing deliberative planning and real-time response.