Delete-free planning underlies many popular relaxation (h+) based heuristics used in state-of-the-art planners; it provides a simpler setting for exploring new pruning methods and other ideas; and a number of interesting recent planning domains are naturally delete-free. In this paper we explore new pruning methods for planning in delete-free planning domains. First, we observe that optimal delete-free plans can be composed from contiguous sub-plans that focus on one fact landmark at a time. Thus, instead of attempting to achieve the goal, the planner can focus on more easily achievable landmarks at each stage. Then, we suggest a number of complementary pruning techniques that are made more powerful with this observation. To carry out these pruning techniques efficiently, we make heavy use of an And/Or graph depicting the planning problem. We empirically evaluate these ideas using the FD framework, and show that they lead to clear improvements.

The Liner Shipping Fleet Repositioning Problem (LSFRP) poses a large financial burden on liner shipping firms. During repositioning, vessels are moved between services in a liner shipping network. The LSFRP is characterized by chains of interacting activities, many of which have costs that are a function of their duration; for example, sailing slowly between two ports is cheaper than sailing quickly. Despite its great industrial importance, the LSFRP has received little attention in the literature. We show how the LSFRP can be solved sub-optimally using the planner POPF and optimally with a mixed-integer program (MIP) and a novel method called Temporal Optimization Planning (TOP). We evaluate the performance of each of these techniques on a dataset of real-world instances from our industrial collaborator, and show that automated planning scales to the size of problems faced by industry.

We present PROST, a probabilistic planning system that is based on the UCT algorithm by Kocsis and Szepesvari (2006), which has been applied successfully to many areas of planning and acting under uncertainty. The objective of this paper is to show the application of UCT to domain- independent probabilistic planning, an area it had not been applied to before. We furthermore present several enhance- ments to the algorithm, including a method that is able to drastically reduce the branching factor by identifying super- fluous actions. We show how search depth limitation leads to a more thoroughly investigated search space in parts that are influential on the quality of a policy, and present a sound and polynomially computable detection of reward locks, states that correspond to, e.g., dead ends or goals. We describe a general Q-value initialization for unvisited nodes in the search tree that circumvents the initial random walks inher- ent to UCT, and leads to a faster convergence on average. We demonstrate the significant influence of the enhancements by providing a comparison on the IPPC benchmark domains.

This paper describes a polynomially-solvable sub-problem of temporal planning. Polynomiality follows from two assumptions. Firstly, by supposing that each sub-goal fluent can be established by at most one action, we can quickly determine which actions are necessary in any plan. Secondly, the monotonicity of sub-goal fluents allows us to express planning as an instance of STP≠ (Simple Temporal Problem, difference constraints). Our class includes temporally-expressive problems, which we illustrate with an example of chemical process planning.

Portfolio planners and parameter tuning are two ideas that have recently attracted significant attention in the domain-independent planning community. We combine these two ideas and present a portfolio planner that runs automatically configured planners. We let the automatic parameter tuning framework ParamILS find fast configurations of the Fast Downward planning system for a number of planning domains. Afterwards we learn a portfolio of those planner configurations. Evaluation of our portfolio planner on the IPC 2011 domains shows that it has a significantly higher IPC score than the winner of the sequential satisficing track.

Human users who execute an automatically generated plan want to understand the rationale behind it. Knowledge-rich plans are particularly suitable for this purpose, because they provide the means to give reason for causal, temporal, and hierarchical relationships between actions. Based on this information, focused arguments can be generated that constitute explanations on an appropriate level of abstraction. In this paper, we present a formal approach to plan explanation. Information about plans is represented as first-order logic formulae and explanations are constructed as proofs in the resulting axiomatic system. With that, plan explanations are provably correct w.r.t. the planning system that produced the plan. A prototype plan explanation system implements our approach and first experiments give evidence that finding plan explanations is feasible in real-time.

The problem of automated planning is known to be intractable in general. Moreover, it has been proven that in some cases finding an optimal solution is much harder than finding any solution. Existing techniques have to compromise between speed of the planning process and quality of solutions. For example, techniques based on greedy search often are able to obtain solutions quickly, but the quality of the solutions is usually low. Similarly, adding macro-operators to planning domains often enables planning speed-up, but solution sequences are typically longer. In this paper, we propose a method for optimizing plans with respect to their length, by post-planning analysis. The method is based on analyzing action dependencies and independencies by which we are able to identify redundant actions or non-optimal sub-plans. To evaluate the process we provide preliminary empirical evidence using benchmark domains.

This work describes an approach that automatically extracts standard metadata information from e-learning contents, combines it with the student preferences/goals and creates PDDL planning domains+problems.These PDDL problems can be solved by current planners, although we motivate the use and benefits of case-based planning techniques, to obtain fully tailored learning routes that significantly enhance the learning process. During the execution of a given route, a monitoring phase is used to detect discrepancies, i.e. flaws that prevent the student from continuing with the original plan. In such a situation, an adaptation mechanism becomes necessary to fix the flaws, while also trying to minimise the differences between the original and the new route. We have integrated this approach on top of Moodle and experimented with 100 benchmark problems to evaluate the quality, scalability and viability of the system.

This paper presents a decision-theoretic planning approach for probabilistic environments where the agent's goal is to win, which we model as maximizing the probability of being above a given reward threshold. In competitive domains, second is as good as last, and it is often desirable to take risks if one is in danger of losing, even if the risk does not pay off very often. Our algorithm maximizes the probability of being above a particular reward threshold by dynamically switching between a suite of policies, each of which encodes a different level of risk. This method does not explicitly encode time or reward into the state space, and decides when to switch between policies during each execution step. We compare a risk-neutral policy to switching among different risk-sensitive policies, and show that our approach improves the agent's probability of winning.

This paper provides an analysis of the efficacy of a known iterative improvement meta-heuristic approach from the AI area in solving the Blocking Job Shop Scheduling Problem (BJSSP) class of problems. The BJSSP is known to have significant fallouts on practical domains, and differs from the classical Job Shop Scheduling Problem (JSSP) in that it assumes that there are no intermediate buffers for storing a job as it moves from one machine to another; according to the BJSSP definition, each job has to wait on a machine until it can be processed on the next machine. In our analysis, two specific variants of the iterative improvement meta-heuristic are evaluated: (1) an adaptation of an existing scheduling algorithm based on the Iterative Flattening Search and (2) an off-the-shelf optimization tool, the IBM ILOG CP Optimizer, which implements Self-Adapting Large Neighborhood Search. Both are applied to a reference benchmark problem set and comparative performance results are presented. The results confirm the effectiveness of the iterative improvement approach in solving the BJSSP; both variants perform well individually and together succeed in improving the entire set of benchmark instances.