In September 2021, the "One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence" project (AI100) issued the second report of its planned long-term periodic assessment of artificial intelligence (AI) and its impact on society. It was written by a panel of 17 study authors, each of whom is deeply rooted in AI research, chaired by Michael Littman of Brown University. The report, entitled "Gathering Strength, Gathering Storms," answers a set of 14 questions probing critical areas of AI development addressing the major risks and dangers of AI, its effects on society, its public perception and the future of the field. The report concludes that AI has made a major leap from the lab to people's lives in recent years, which increases the urgency to understand its potential negative effects. The questions were developed by the AI100 Standing Committee, chaired by Peter Stone of the University of Texas at Austin, consisting of a group of AI leaders with expertise in computer science, sociology, ethics, economics, and other disciplines.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming ubiquitous. It provides directions while we drive, answers our questions, offers music recommendations and powers a growing number of business processes in the workplace. In fact, AI is working its way into so many aspects of our personal and professional lives that my company has begun to refer to it as "everyday AI." Soon, I'd argue, it will become as ubiquitous -- and necessary -- as electricity. Yet, despite the progress, we've only scratched the surface in the potential ways that AI can, and no doubt will, change business and the world. Gartner has forecast that it will take until 2025 for half of organizations worldwide to reach what Gartner's AI maturity model describes as the "stabilization stage" of AI maturity or beyond.

What exactly is artificial intelligence (AI)? The replication of human intellectual processes by machines, particularly computer systems, is known as artificial intelligence. Expert systems, natural language processing, speech recognition, and machine vision are examples of AI applications. How does artificial intelligence work? As the excitement surrounding AI has grown, businesses have been scurrying to showcase how their goods and services include AI. What they call AI is frequently just one component of AI, such as machine learning. AI requires specialized hardware and software to write and train machine learning algorithms.

Recently online advertisers utilize Recommender systems (RSs) for display advertising to improve users' engagement. The contextual bandit model is a widely used RS to exploit and explore users' engagement and maximize the long-term rewards such as clicks or conversions. However, the current models aim to optimize a set of ads only in a specific domain and do not share information with other models in multiple domains. In this paper, we propose dynamic collaborative filtering Thompson Sampling (DCTS), the novel yet simple model to transfer knowledge among multiple bandit models. DCTS exploits similarities between users and between ads to estimate a prior distribution of Thompson sampling. Such similarities are obtained based on contextual features of users and ads. Similarities enable models in a domain that didn't have much data to converge more quickly by transferring knowledge. Moreover, DCTS incorporates temporal dynamics of users to track the user's recent change of preference. We first show transferring knowledge and incorporating temporal dynamics improve the performance of the baseline models on a synthetic dataset. Then we conduct an empirical analysis on a real-world dataset and the result showed that DCTS improves click-through rate by 9.7% than the state-of-the-art models. We also analyze hyper-parameters that adjust temporal dynamics and similarities and show the best parameter which maximizes CTR.

Understanding human behavior and monitoring mental health are essential to maintaining the community and society's safety. As there has been an increase in mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic due to uncontrolled mental health, early detection of mental issues is crucial. Nowadays, the usage of Intelligent Virtual Personal Assistants (IVA) has increased worldwide. Individuals use their voices to control these devices to fulfill requests and acquire different services. This paper proposes a novel deep learning model based on the gated recurrent neural network and convolution neural network to understand human emotion from speech to improve their IVA services and monitor their mental health.

Model misspecification is a major consideration in applications of statistical methods and machine learning. However, it is often neglected in contextual bandits. This paper studies a common form of misspecification, an inter-arm heterogeneity that is not captured by context. To address this issue, we assume that the heterogeneity arises due to arm-specific random variables, which can be learned. We call this setting a robust contextual bandit. The arm-specific variables explain the unknown inter-arm heterogeneity, and we incorporate them in the robust contextual estimator of the mean reward and its uncertainty. We develop two efficient bandit algorithms for our setting: a UCB algorithm called RoLinUCB and a posterior-sampling algorithm called RoLinTS. We analyze both algorithms and bound their $n$-round Bayes regret. Our experiments show that RoLinTS is comparably statistically efficient to the classic methods when the misspecification is low, more robust when the misspecification is high, and significantly more computationally efficient than its naive implementation.

Starting next month, dating app Hinge will begin rolling out a new profile verification feature to combat a surge in fake accounts. Dubbed "Selfie Verification," the feature will prompt users to upload a video of themselves, which the app, with a combination of machine learning and human oversight, will use to confirm they look like the person pictured in their profile. People who complete the process will get a "Verified" badge on their dating profile. Hinge parent company Match Group told Wired, the first publication to report on the feature, that Selfie Verification would roll out to all users by December. "As romance scammers find new ways to defraud people, we are committed to investing in new updates and technologies that prevent harm to our daters," Hinge spokesperson Jarryd Boyd told the outlet.

Amazon, Netflix, and Indeed don't simply provide more options than traditional retail stores, video rental stores, and newspapers -- they provide so many more options that the human mind can effectively comprehend and parse. Users need to be shown what will most appeal to them. There were recommender systems before deep learning, but until that advancement, technical constraints ensured choice remained tyrannical. Deep learning has become an essential component of recommender systems, and anyone who wants to understand the latter must understand the former. Traditional recommender systems make recommendations to users based on previous user interactions or attributes, depending on whether the recommender system uses content-based filtering, collaborative filtering, or a hybrid of the two. Content-based filtering recommends items with similar features to items a user interacted with in the past.

Match Group, which operates one of the world's largest portfolios of dating apps, will soon add a new profile verification feature to its popular dating app Hinge. The feature is part of a larger effort to crack down on scammers who use fake photos and purport to be people they're not on the app, often with the intent of eventually scheming romantic conquests out of money. Jarryd Boyd, director of brand communications for Hinge, said in a written statement that Hinge will begin rolling out the feature, named Selfie Verification, next month. Hinge will ask users to take a video selfie within the app in order to confirm they're a real person and not a digital fake. Match Group then plans to use a combination of machine learning technology and human moderators to "compare facial geometries from the video selfie to photos on the user's profile," Boyd said.

Earlier this year, Zoom announced a Byzantine policy change that, if I thought about it at all when it happened, I probably would have expected to have almost no impact on my life: One-on-one video calls, which had previously been free and unrestricted for all non-paying users of its platform, would now have a 40-minute time limit just like group calls. A bummer for thrifty Zoom power users, perhaps, but at the time, I was blessed to live an existence of only sporadic Zooming. Then a few months ago I had occasion to start using Zoom a little more frequently. I would love to leave the reasons for this sudden Zoomassaince vague and retain one emotional support shred of dignity, but there's no real way to explain the rest without disclosing the following: I had decided it was time to "get back out there" and was using Zoom to go on video dates. After meeting and chatting with people on dating apps, I would suggest we talk on video before actually getting together in person, et violà: video date.