On a rainy Tuesday in San Francisco, Apple executives took the stage in a crowded auditorium to unveil the fifth-generation iPhone. The phone, which looked identical to the previous version, had a new feature that the audience was soon buzzing about: Siri, a virtual assistant. Scott Forstall, then Apple's head of software, pushed an iPhone button to summon Siri and prodded it with questions. At his request, Siri checked the time in Paris ("8:16 p.m.," Siri replied), defined the word "mitosis" ("Cell division in which the nucleus divides into nuclei containing the same number of chromosomes," it said) and pulled up a list of 14 highly rated Greek restaurants, five of them in Palo Alto, Calif. "I've been in the A.I. field for a long time, and this still blows me away," Mr. Forstall said.

The performance of a Collaborative Filtering (CF) method is based on the properties of a User-Item Rating Matrix (URM). And the properties or Rating Data Characteristics (RDC) of a URM are constantly changing. Recent studies significantly explained the variation in the performances of CF methods resulted due to the change in URM using six or more RDC. Here, we found that the significant proportion of variation in the performances of different CF techniques can be accounted to two RDC only. The two RDC are the number of ratings per user or Information per User (IpU) and the number of ratings per item or Information per Item (IpI). And the performances of CF algorithms are quadratic to IpU (or IpI) for a square URM. The findings of this study are based on seven well-established CF methods and three popular public recommender datasets: 1M MovieLens, 25M MovieLens, and Yahoo! Music Rating datasets

Recently, there has been an increasing adoption of differential privacy guided algorithms for privacy-preserving machine learning tasks. However, the use of such algorithms comes with trade-offs in terms of algorithmic fairness, which has been widely acknowledged. Specifically, we have empirically observed that the classical collaborative filtering method, trained by differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD), results in a disparate impact on user groups with respect to different user engagement levels. This, in turn, causes the original unfair model to become even more biased against inactive users. To address the above issues, we propose \textbf{DP-Fair}, a two-stage framework for collaborative filtering based algorithms. Specifically, it combines differential privacy mechanisms with fairness constraints to protect user privacy while ensuring fair recommendations. The experimental results, based on Amazon datasets, and user history logs collected from Etsy, one of the largest e-commerce platforms, demonstrate that our proposed method exhibits superior performance in terms of both overall accuracy and user group fairness on both shallow and deep recommendation models compared to vanilla DP-SGD.

Research interest in task-oriented dialogs has increased as systems such as Google Assistant, Alexa and Siri have become ubiquitous in everyday life. However, the impact of academic research in this area has been limited by the lack of datasets that realistically capture the wide array of user pain points. To enable research on some of the more challenging aspects of parsing realistic conversations, we introduce PRESTO, a public dataset of over 550K contextual multilingual conversations between humans and virtual assistants. PRESTO contains a diverse array of challenges that occur in real-world NLU tasks such as disfluencies, code-switching, and revisions. It is the only large scale human generated conversational parsing dataset that provides structured context such as a user's contacts and lists for each example. Our mT5 model based baselines demonstrate that the conversational phenomenon present in PRESTO are challenging to model, which is further pronounced in a low-resource setup.

The impacts of link recommendations on social networks are challenging to evaluate, and so far they have been studied in limited settings. Observational studies are restricted in the kinds of causal questions they can answer and naive A/B tests often lead to biased evaluations due to unaccounted network interference. Furthermore, evaluations in simulation settings are often limited to static network models that do not take into account the potential feedback loops between link recommendation and organic network evolution. To this end, we study the impacts of recommendations on social networks in dynamic settings. Adopting a simulation-based approach, we consider an explicit dynamic formation model -- an extension of the celebrated Jackson-Rogers model -- and investigate how link recommendations affect network evolution over time. Empirically, we find that link recommendations have surprising delayed and indirect effects on the structural properties of networks. Specifically, we find that link recommendations can exhibit considerably different impacts in the immediate term and in the long term. For instance, we observe that friend-of-friend recommendations can have an immediate effect in decreasing degree inequality, but in the long term, they can make the degree distribution substantially more unequal. Moreover, we show that the effects of recommendations can persist in networks, in part due to their indirect impacts on natural dynamics even after recommendations are turned off. We show that, in counterfactual simulations, removing the indirect effects of link recommendations can make the network trend faster toward what it would have been under natural growth dynamics.

With the rise of big data, artificial intelligence (AI), and data mining techniques, group analysis has increasingly become a powerful tool in many applications, ranging from policy-making, direct marketing, education, to healthcare. For example, an important analysis strategy is group profiling, which extracts and describes the characteristics of groups of people [40]; it has been commonly used for customized recommendations to overcome sparse and missing personal data [25]. The same strategy is also used for mining social media, educational, and healthcare data to understand the shared characteristics of online communities or student/patient cohorts [15, 51, 100]. While it may help to support public and private services or product creations that are better tailored to different communities, group profiles resulted from mathematical inference are typically not valid for every individual regarded as a member in the group (this is known as non-distributive group profiles) [40]. The shared group characteristics extracted from data can have social ramifications such as stereotyping, stigmatization, or lead to pernicious consequences in decision making because individuals might be judged by group characteristics they do not posses [24, 56, 58].

On a rainy Tuesday in San Francisco, Apple executives took the stage to a packed auditorium to unveil the fifth-generation iPhone. The phone, which looked identical to the previous version, had a new feature that the public was quick to comment: Siri, a virtual assistant. Scott Forstall, then Apple's chief software officer, pressed a button on the iPhone to call Siri and asked questions. At his request, Siri checked the time in Paris ("20:16," Siri replied), defined the word "mitosis" ("Cell division in which the nucleus is divided into nuclei containing the same number of chromosomes," he said) and has published a list of 14 Greek restaurants highly regarded, five of them in Palo Alto, California. "I've been in the field of artificial intelligence for a long time and it continues to amaze me," Forstall says.

Free Coupon Discount - The most in-depth course on recommendation systems with deep learning, machine learning, data science, and AI techniques Created by Lazy Programmer Inc. Students also bought Artificial Intelligence: Reinforcement Learning in Python Data Science: Natural Language Processing (NLP) in Python Unsupervised Machine Learning Hidden Markov Models in Python Natural Language Processing with Deep Learning in Python Cluster Analysis and Unsupervised Machine Learning in Python Preview this Udemy Course GET COUPON CODE Description Believe it or not, almost all online businesses today make use of recommender systems in some way or another. What do I mean by "recommender systems", and why are they useful? Let's look at the top 3 websites on the Internet, according to Alexa: Google, YouTube, and Facebook. Recommender systems form the very foundation of these technologies. Google: Search results They are why Google is the most successful technology company today.

Collaborative filtering is a clever recommendation system technique that predicts what you'll like based on others with similar tastes. Super useful for businesses like Netflix or Amazon to personalize suggestions! For example, if you and another user both love sci-fi, it'll recommend shows they enjoyed, knowing you'll probably like them as well. Learning latent factors is all about discovering hidden features that help explain user-item interactions, like why people like certain movies. For example, suppose we're recommending movies.

Persuasion is a key aspect of what it means to be human, and is central to business, politics, and other endeavors. Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have produced AI systems that are capable of persuading humans to buy products, watch videos, click on search results, and more. Even systems that are not explicitly designed to persuade may do so in practice. In the future, increasingly anthropomorphic AI systems may form ongoing relationships with users, increasing their persuasive power. This paper investigates the uncertain future of persuasive AI systems. We examine ways that AI could qualitatively alter our relationship to and views regarding persuasion by shifting the balance of persuasive power, allowing personalized persuasion to be deployed at scale, powering misinformation campaigns, and changing the way humans can shape their own discourse. We consider ways AI-driven persuasion could differ from human-driven persuasion. We warn that ubiquitous highlypersuasive AI systems could alter our information environment so significantly so as to contribute to a loss of human control of our own future. In response, we examine several potential responses to AI-driven persuasion: prohibition, identification of AI agents, truthful AI, and legal remedies. We conclude that none of these solutions will be airtight, and that individuals and governments will need to take active steps to guard against the most pernicious effects of persuasive AI.