Cyber Security is one of the most arising disciplines in our modern society. We work on Cybersecurity domain and in this the topic we chose is Cyber Security Ontologies. In this we gather all latest and previous ontologies and compare them on the basis of different analyzing factors to get best of them. Reason to select this topic is to assemble different ontologies from different era of time. Because, researches that included in this SLR is mostly studied single ontology. If any researcher wants to study ontologies, he has to study every single ontology and select which one is best for his research. So, we assemble different types of ontology and compare them against each other to get best of them. A total 24 papers between years 2010-2020 are carefully selected through systematic process and classified accordingly. Lastly, this SLR have been presented to provide the researchers promising future directions in the domain of cybersecurity ontologies.

Due to the increasing adoption of electronic health records (EHR), large scale EHRs have become another rich data source for translational clinical research. Despite its potential, deriving generalizable knowledge from EHR data remains challenging. First, EHR data are generated as part of clinical care with data elements too detailed and fragmented for research. Despite recent progress in mapping EHR data to common ontology with hierarchical structures, much development is still needed to enable automatic grouping of local EHR codes to meaningful clinical concepts at a large scale. Second, the total number of unique EHR features is large, imposing methodological challenges to derive reproducible knowledge graph, especially when interest lies in conditional dependency structure. Third, the detailed EHR data on a very large patient cohort imposes additional computational challenge to deriving a knowledge network. To overcome these challenges, we propose to infer the conditional dependency structure among EHR features via a latent graphical block model (LGBM). The LGBM has a two layer structure with the first providing semantic embedding vector (SEV) representation for the EHR features and the second overlaying a graphical block model on the latent SEVs. The block structures on the graphical model also allows us to cluster synonymous features in EHR. We propose to learn the LGBM efficiently, in both statistical and computational sense, based on the empirical point mutual information matrix. We establish the statistical rates of the proposed estimators and show the perfect recovery of the block structure. Numerical results from simulation studies and real EHR data analyses suggest that the proposed LGBM estimator performs well in finite sample.

Lexical Semantic Change is the study of how the meaning of words evolves through time. Another related question is whether and how lexical relations over pairs of words, such as synonymy, change over time. There are currently two competing, apparently opposite hypotheses in the historical linguistic literature regarding how synonymous words evolve: the Law of Differentiation (LD) argues that synonyms tend to take on different meanings over time, whereas the Law of Parallel Change (LPC) claims that synonyms tend to undergo the same semantic change and therefore remain synonyms. So far, there has been little research using distributional models to assess to what extent these laws apply on historical corpora. In this work, we take a first step toward detecting whether LD or LPC operates for given word pairs. After recasting the problem into a more tractable task, we combine two linguistic resources to propose the first complete evaluation framework on this problem and provide empirical evidence in favor of a dominance of LD. We then propose various computational approaches to the problem using Distributional Semantic Models and grounded in recent literature on Lexical Semantic Change detection. Our best approaches achieve a balanced accuracy above 0.6 on our dataset. We discuss challenges still faced by these approaches, such as polysemy or the potential confusion between synonymy and hypernymy.

Online resources such as WikiHow compile a wide range of scripts for performing everyday tasks, which can assist models in learning to reason about procedures. However, the scripts are always presented in a linear manner, which does not reflect the flexibility displayed by people executing tasks in real life. For example, in the CrossTask Dataset, 64.5% of consecutive step pairs are also observed in the reverse order, suggesting their ordering is not fixed. In addition, each step has an average of 2.56 frequent next steps, demonstrating "branching". In this paper, we propose the new challenging task of non-sequential graph script induction, aiming to capture optional and interchangeable steps in procedural planning. To automate the induction of such graph scripts for given tasks, we propose to take advantage of loosely aligned videos of people performing the tasks. In particular, we design a multimodal framework to ground procedural videos to WikiHow textual steps and thus transform each video into an observed step path on the latent ground truth graph script. This key transformation enables us to train a script knowledge model capable of both generating explicit graph scripts for learnt tasks and predicting future steps given a partial step sequence. Our best model outperforms the strongest pure text/vision baselines by 17.52% absolute gains on F1@3 for next step prediction and 13.8% absolute gains on Acc@1 for partial sequence completion. Human evaluation shows our model outperforming the WikiHow linear baseline by 48.76% absolute gains in capturing sequential and non-sequential step relationships.

Knowledge can take different forms. We distinguish between declarative knowledge (knowing something) or procedural knowledge (knowing how, know-how), sensorimotor knowledge (riding a bicycle), and affective knowledge (deep understanding). The classic definition of knowledge derived from philosophy defines knowledge as a justified true belief. It can be said to occur in situations where we consider something to be objectively "true" or "stated". Another definition refers to what is "explicit knowledge" that is something that is known and can be written down [30].

This article presents a 5-level AI Capability Assessment Model (AI-CAM) and a related AI Capabilities Matrix (AI-CM) to assist practitioners in AI comprehension and adoption. These practical tools were developed with business executives, technologists, and other organisational stakeholders in mind. They are founded on a comprehensive conception of AI compared to those in other AI adoption models and are also open-source artefacts. Thus, the AI-CAM and AI-CM present an accessible resource to help inform organisational decision-makers on the capability requirements for (1) AI-based data analytics use cases based on machine learning technologies; (2) Knowledge representation to engineer and represent data, information and knowledge using semantic technologies; and (3) AI-based solutions that seek to emulate human reasoning and decision-making. The AI-CAM covers the core capability dimensions (business, data, technology, organisation, AI skills, risks, and ethical considerations) required at the five capability maturity levels to achieve optimal use of AI in organisations. The AI-CM details the related individual and team-level capabilities needed to reach each level in organisational AI capability; it, therefore, extends and enriches existing perspectives by introducing knowledge and skills requirements at all levels of an organisation. It posits three levels of AI proficiency: (1) Basic, for operational users who interact with AI and participate in AI adoption; (2) Advanced, for professionals who are charged with comprehending AI and developing related business models and strategies; and (3) Expert, for computer engineers, data scientists, and knowledge engineers participating in the design and implementation of AIbased technologies to support business use cases. In conclusion, the AI-CAM and AI-CM present a valuable resource for practitioners, businesses, and technologists, looking to innovate using AI technologies and maximise the return to their organisations.

In order to deploy automated vehicles to the public, it has to be proven that the vehicle can safely and robustly handle traffic in many different scenarios. One important component of automated vehicles is the perception system that captures and processes the environment around the vehicle. Perception systems require large datasets for training their deep neural network. Knowing which parts of the data in these datasets describe a corner case is an advantage during training or testing of the network. These corner cases describe situations that are rare and potentially challenging for the network. We propose a pipeline that converts collective expert knowledge descriptions into the extended KI Absicherung ontology. The ontology is used to describe scenes and scenarios that can be mapped to perception datasets. The corner cases can then be extracted from the datasets. In addition, the pipeline enables the evaluation of the detection networks against the extracted corner cases to measure their performance.

NeSy4VRD is a multifaceted resource designed to support the development of neurosymbolic AI (NeSy) research. NeSy4VRD re-establishes public access to the images of the VRD dataset and couples them with an extensively revised, quality-improved version of the VRD visual relationship annotations. Crucially, NeSy4VRD provides a well-aligned, companion OWL ontology that describes the dataset domain. It comes with open source infrastructure that provides comprehensive support for extensibility of the annotations (which, in turn, facilitates extensibility of the ontology), and open source code for loading the annotations to/from a knowledge graph. We are contributing NeSy4VRD to the computer vision, NeSy and Semantic Web communities to help foster more NeSy research using OWL-based knowledge graphs.

Existing event-centric NLP models often only apply to the pre-defined ontology, which significantly restricts their generalization capabilities. This paper presents CEO, a novel Corpus-based Event Ontology induction model to relax the restriction imposed by pre-defined event ontologies. Without direct supervision, CEO leverages distant supervision from available summary datasets to detect corpus-wise salient events and exploits external event knowledge to force events within a short distance to have close embeddings. Experiments on three popular event datasets show that the schema induced by CEO has better coverage and higher accuracy than previous methods. Moreover, CEO is the first event ontology induction model that can induce a hierarchical event ontology with meaningful names on eleven open-domain corpora, making the induced schema more trustworthy and easier to be further curated.

Fine-grained entity typing (FET), which assigns entities in text with context-sensitive, fine-grained semantic types, will play an important role in natural language understanding. A supervised FET method, which typically relies on human-annotated corpora for training, is costly and difficult to scale. Recent studies leverage pre-trained language models (PLMs) to generate rich and context-aware weak supervision for FET. However, a PLM may still generate a mixture of rough and fine-grained types, or tokens unsuitable for typing. In this study, we vision that an ontology provides a semantics-rich, hierarchical structure, which will help select the best results generated by multiple PLM models and head words. Specifically, we propose a novel zero-shot, ontology-guided FET method, OntoType, which follows a type ontological structure, from coarse to fine, ensembles multiple PLM prompting results to generate a set of type candidates, and refines its type resolution, under the local context with a natural language inference model. Our experiments on the Ontonotes, FIGER, and NYT datasets using their associated ontological structures demonstrate that our method outperforms the state-of-the-art zero-shot fine-grained entity typing methods. Our error analysis shows that refinement of the existing ontology structures will further improve fine-grained entity typing.