Ontologies
Exceptions in Ontologies: Deducing Properties from Topological Axioms
Jouis, Christophe (Universite Pierre et Marie Curie) | Habib, Bassel (Universite Pierre et Marie Curie) | Liu, Jie (Universite Pierre et Marie Curie)
This paper is a contribution to formal ontology study. We propose a new model of knowledge representation by combining ontologies and topology. In order to represent atypical entities in the ontologies, we introduce topological operators of interior, exterior, border and closure. These operators allow us to describe whether an entity, belonging to a class, is typical or not. We define a system of relations of inclusion and membership by adapting the topological operators. We propose to formalize the topological relations of inclusion and membership by using the mathematical properties of topological operators. However, there are properties of combining operators of interior, exterior, border and closure allowing the definition of an algebra (Kuratowski, 1958). We propose to use these mathematical properties as a set of axioms. This set of axioms allows us to establish the properties of topological relations of inclusion and membership.
Invited Talks
Aleven, Vincent (Carnegie Mellon University) | Freuder, Eugene C. (University College Cork) | Graesser, Arthur C. (The University of Memphis) | Pustejovsky, James (Brandeis University) | Wiebe, Jan (University of Pittsburgh)
Vincent Aleven Intelligent tutoring systems (ITS) are highly effective in supporting student learning, but are difficult to build. The Cognitive Tutor Authoring Tools (CTAT) project started over 6 years ago with the goals of making it easier for experienced programmers, and possible for non-programmers to create an ITS. CTAT supports tutor building through programming by demonstration, an approach that has been successful in a range of application areas, but that has been applied to only a very limited degree to ITS authoring. Using CTAT, an author creates a tutor by demonstrating correct and incorrect problem solving behaviors, rather than by writing code. The resulting tutors, called exampletracing tutors, evaluate student behavior by flexibly comparing it against the demonstrated problem-solving examples.
Spyglass: A System for Ontology Based Document Retrieval and Visualization
Rushing, John (University of Alabama in Huntsville) | Berendes, Todd (University of Alabama in Huntsville) | Lin, Hong (University of Alabama in Huntsville) | Buntain, Cody (University of Alabama in Huntsville) | Graves, Sara (University of Alabama in Huntsville)
This paper describes the Spyglass tool, which is designed to help analysts explore very large collections of unstructured text documents. Spyglass uses a domain ontology to index documents, and provides retrieval and visualization services based on the ontology and the resulting index. The ontology based approach allows analysts to share information and helps to ensure consistency of results. The approach is also scalable and lends itself very well to parallel computation. The Spyglass system is described in detail and indexing and query results using a large set of sample documents are presented.
What a Legal CBR Ontology Should Provide
Ashley, Kevin D. (University of Pittsburgh)
This paper discusses the state of the art in CBR ontologies from the perspective of one developing an improved system for case-based legal reasoning. The paper proposes three specific roles for a CBR ontology and illustrates them in the context of the intended output of the new system: a legal classroom discussion of how to decide a case featuring hypothetical reasoning and abstract analogies. The paper distills the ontological requirements for modeling the example’s case-based arguments and assesses whether current research can meet those requirements. The concrete example helps to focus on and define goals for improving CBR ontologies.
Toward a Formal Ontology of Time from Aspects
Desclés, Jean-Pierre (Sorbonne University) | Arena, Aurelien (Sorbonne University)
We present a work in the field of formal ontologies, notion taken from the knowledge representation community. What we study is the concept of time and aspect described and conceptualized from linguistics. Our aim is thus to propose a formal ontology of time and aspect considering temporal concepts introduced in a formal way.
Special Track on Semantics, Ontologies, and Computational Linguistics
Biskri, Ismail (University of Quebec) | Pascu, Anca (University of Bretagne Occidental) | Dapoigny, Richard (University of Savoie) | LePriol, Florence (University of Paris-Sorbonne)
One of the most salient subfields of AI is computational linguistics, which includes its applied branch - natural language processing (NLP). Computational linguistics is a subfield of AI, developing methods and algorithms for all the aspects of language analysis and their computer implementation. We can see language analysis split into two parts: the theoretic analysis and the applicative one. The theoretic aspect includes standard levels considered in linguistics: semantics, syntax, and morphology. Semantic theories have to be a guide of syntactical theories and morphological developments.
Are Ontologies Involved in Natural Language Processing?
Abraham, Maryvonne (Institut TELECOM, Telecom Bretagne)
For certain disable persons unable to communicate, we present a palliative aid which consists of a virtual pictographic keyboard associated to a text processing from a pictographic scripture. Words and the grammar are given as pictograms. The pictographic lexicon must be organized following the mental lexicon of the user to propose the pictograms of grammar in order to facilitate his (her) task of writing. We discuss the utility of ontologies in the organization of lexicons and in the building of texts.
A Semantic Framework for Uncertainties in Ontologies
Hois, Joana (University of Bremen)
We present a semantically-driven approach to uncertainties within and across ontologies. Ontologies are widely used not only by the Semantic Web but also by artificial systems in general. They represent and structure a domain with respect to its semantics. Uncertainties, however, have been rarely taken into account in ontological representation, even though they are inevitable when applying ontologies in `real world' applications. In this paper, we analyze why uncertainties are necessary for ontologies, how and where uncertainties have to be represented in ontologies, and what their semantics are. In particular, we investigate which ontology constructions need to address uncertainty issues and which ontology constructions should not be affected by uncertainties on the basis of their semantics. As a result, the use of uncertainties is restricted to appropriate cases, which reduces complexity and guides ontology development. We give examples and motivation from the field of spatially-aware systems in indoor environments.
Organizing Knowledge as an Ontology of the Domain of Resilient Computing by Means of Natural Language Processing - An Experience Report -
Avizienis, Algirdas (Vytautas Magnus University) | Grigonyte, Gintare (Saarland University and Vytautas Magnus University) | Haller, Johann (IAI) | Henke, Friedrich von (Ulm University) | Liebig, Thorsten (Ulm University) | Noppens, Olaf (Ulm University)
Scientists typically need to take a large volume of information into account in order to deal with re-occurring tasks such as inspecting proceedings, finding related work, or reviewing papers. Our work aims at filling the gap between text documents and a structured representations of their content in the domain of resilience computing by combining computer linguistics and ontological methods. The results of our research include: a thesaurus of the domain, automatic clustering of the domain documents, a domain ontology, and a tool for constructing ontologies with the aid of domain thesauri.
Sentence Simplification Based Ontology Mapping
Lu, Lu (GuangDong University of Business Studies) | Parameswaran, Nandan (University of New South Wales)
Ontology mapping plays an important role in interoperability over ontologies. Many researchers have proposed algorithms and tools for (semi-)automatically mapping one concept to another concept. Among them, WordNet is widely used as the domain knowledge support in the mapping process. To our knowledge, however, most of them only use synonym, hypernym and hyponym relations in WordNet and the actual meanings provided in natural English(as gloss) are often ignored. In this paper, we treat the concepts(c) as English words (w) and propose an ontology mapping technique where we use the meanings of the words as given in Wordnet (in English) for semantic mapping by constructing their parse trees first and simplifying them for computing similarity measures. Our experimental results show that our method performs better in Recall and F1-Measure than many techniques reported in the literature.