In this paper we show that the problem of deciding the consistency of a knowledge base in the Description Logic ALCM is ExpTime-complete. The M stands for meta-modelling as defined by Motz, Rohrer and Severi. To show our main result, we define an ExpTime Tableau algorithm as an extension of an algorithm for ALC by Nguyen and Szalas.

Inspired by recent work on higher-order Description Logics, we propose HOS, a new semantics for OWL 2 QL ontologies. We then consider SPARQL queries which are legal under the direct semantics entailment regime,we extend them with logical union, existential variables, and unrestricted use of variables so as to express meaningful meta-level queries. We show that both satisfiability checking and answering instance queries with metavariables have the same ABox complexity as under direct semantics.

Graphol is a visual language designed to help non-experts to understand and specify ontologies. Our language builds on the Entity-Relationship model, but has a formal semantics and higher expressiveness. Notably, OWL 2 can be completely encoded in Graphol. Thanks to the novel open-source Eddy ontology editor, designers can easily draw Graphol diagrams corresponding to OWL ontologies and export them into standard OWL 2 format. Both Graphol and Eddy have been used in several successful industrial projects and are currently under active development. This paper reports on our more recent progresses.

We consider the problem of obtaining coherence in a propositional knowledge base using techniques from Belief Change. Our motivation comes from the field of formal ontologies where coherence is interpreted to mean that a concept name has to be satisfiable. In the propositional case we consider here, this translates to a propositional formula being satisfiable. We define belief change operators in a framework of nonmonotonic preferential reasoning.We show how the introduction of defeasible information using contraction operators can be an effective means for obtaining coherence.

SPARQL, a query language for RDF graphs, is one of the key technologies for the Semantic Web. The expressivity and complexity of various fragments of SPARQL have been studied extensively. It is usually assumed that the optional matching operator OPTIONAL has only two graph patterns as arguments. The specification of SPARQL, however, defines it as a ternary operator, with an additional filter condition. We address the problem of expressibility of the full ternary OPTIONAL via the simplified binary version and show that it is possible, but only with an exponential blowup in the size of the query (under common complexity-theoretic assumptions). We also study expressibility of other non-monotone SPARQL operators via optional matching and each other.

Previous work has proposed consistent query answering as a way to resolve inconsistencies in ontologies. In these approaches to consistent query answering, however, only inconsistencies due to errors in the underlying database are considered. In this paper, we additionally assume that ontological axioms may be erroneous, and that some database atoms and ontological axioms may not be removed to resolve inconsistencies. This problem is especially well suited in debugging mappings between distributed ontologies. We define two different semantics, one where ontological axioms as a whole are ignored to resolve an inconsistency, and one where only some of their instances are ignored. We then give a precise picture of the complexity of consistent query answering under these two semantics when ontological axioms are encoded as different classes of existential rules. In the course of this, we also close two open complexity problems in standard consistent query answering under existential rules.

A referring expression in linguistics is any noun phrase identifying an object in a way that will be useful to interlocutors. In the context of a query over a first order knowledge base K, constant symbols occurring in K are the artifacts usually used as referring expressions in certain answers to the query. In this paper, we begin to explore how this can be usefully extended by allowing a class of more general formulas, called Singular Referring Expressions, to replace constants in this role. In particular, we lay a foundation for admitting Singular Referring Expressions in certain answer computation for queries over K. An integral part of this foundation are characterization theorems for identification properties of Singular Referring Expressions for queries annotated with a domain specific language for referring concept types. Finally, we apply this framework in the context of tractable description logic dialects, showing how identification properties can be determined at compile-time for conjunctive queries, and how off-the-shelf conjunctive query evaluation for these dialects can be used in query evaluations, preserving, in all cases, underlying tractability.

Recently, the field of knowledge representation is drawing a lot of inspiration from database theory. In particular, in the area of description logics and ontology languages, interest has shifted from satisfiability checking to query answering, with various query notions adopted from databases, like (unions of) conjunctive queries or different kinds of path queries. Likewise, the finite model semantics is being established as a viable and interesting alternative to the traditional semantics based on unrestricted models. In this paper, we investigate diverse database-inspired reasoning problems for very expressive description logics (all featuring the worrisome trias of inverses, counting, and nominals) which have in common that role paths of unbounded length can be described (in the knowledge base or of the query), leading to a certain non-locality of the reasoning problem. We show that for all the cases considered, undecidability can be established by very similar means. Most notably, we show undecidability of finite entailment of unions of conjunctive queries for a fragment of SHOIQ (the logic underlying the OWL DL ontology language), and undecidability of finite entailment of conjunctive queries for a fragment of SROIQ (the logical basis of the more recent and popular OWL 2 DL standard).

We study anti-unification for the description logic EL and introduce thenotion of least general generalisation, which generalises simultaneously leastcommon subsumer and concept matching. The idea of generalisation of twoconcepts is to detect maximal similarities between them, and to abstract overtheir differences uniformly. We demonstrate that a finite minimal complete setof generalisations for ELconcepts always exists and establish complexitybounds for computing them. Wepresent an anti-unification algorithm that computes generalisations with afixed skeleton, study its properties and report on preliminary experimental evaluation.

Ontology alignment (also called ontology matching) is the process of identifying correspondences between entities in different, possibly heterogeneous, ontologies. Traditional ontology alignment techniques rely on the full disclosure of the ontological models; however, within open and opportunistic environments, such approaches may not always be pragmatic or even acceptable (due to privacy concerns). Several studies have focussed on collaborative, decentralised approaches to ontology alignment, where agents negotiate the acceptability of single correspondences acquired from past encounters, or try to ascertain novel correspondences on the fly. However, such approaches can lead to logical violations that may undermine their utility. In this paper, we extend a dialogical approach to correspondence negotiation, whereby agents not only exchange details of possible correspondences, but also identify potential violations to the consistency and conservativity principles. We present a formal model of the dialogue, and show how agents can repair logical violations during the dialogue by invoking a correspondence repair, thus negotiating and exchanging repair plans. We illustrate this opportunistic alignment mechanism with an example and we empirically show that allowing agents to strategically reject or weaken correspondences when these cause violations does not degrade the effectiveness of the alignment computed, whilst reducing the number of residual violations.