Ontologies
Toward a universal decoder of linguistic meaning from brain activation
Humans have the unique capacity to translate thoughts into words, and to infer others' thoughts from their utterances. This ability is based on mental representations of meaning that can be mapped to language, but to which we have no direct access. The approach to meaning representation that currently dominates the field of natural language processing relies on distributional semantic models, which rest on the simple yet powerful idea that words similar in meaning occur in similar linguistic contexts1. A word is represented as a semantic vector in a high-dimensional space, where similarity between two word vectors reflects similarity of the contexts in which those words appear in the language2. More recently, these models have been extended beyond single words to express meanings of phrases and sentences5,6,7, and the resulting representations predict human similarity judgments for phrase- and sentence-level paraphrases8,9.
#IoT #Ecosystems require #Ontologies of your #Products and #Services – Paradigm Interactions
Products and services associated with the IoT currently operate in closed ecosystems like Home Automation, in effect, they are simply networked products with linking software. Part machine to machine (M2M) and part human to machine or machine to human (H2M setup and observation and M2H alerts). The IoT is an open ecosystem, made up of billions of product, services and people ecosystems. An ontology is a formal naming and definition of the types, properties, and interrelationships of the entities that really or fundamentally exist for a particular domain. If you're looking for advice on how your products or services can be made ready for the IoT please contact us.
Cycorp – Cycorp Making Solutions Better
EnterpriseCyc is a fully supported version of the knowledge base and reasoning technology that includes enterprise-grade development, deployment, and administration capabilities. It can be licensed for commercial applications. Academic institutions also have the option to license ResearchCyc, a full version of the knowledge base and reasoning technology that is strictly for non-commercial research purposes. The Platforms provide a powerful knowledge representation language (CycL), a vast ontology of concepts and relations, and a formally modeled repository of knowledge about these concepts enabling you to build on decades of knowledge modeling rather than starting from a blank page. In addition, Cyc includes an inference (reasoning) engine that makes use of a large suite of custom reasoners that provide unparalleled performance over a large knowledge base and any volume of data.
Truth Validation with Evidence
Wongchaisuwat, Papis, Klabjan, Diego
In the modern era, abundant information is easily accessible from various sources, however only a few of these sources are reliable as they mostly contain unverified contents. We develop a system to validate the truthfulness of a given statement together with underlying evidence. The proposed system provides supporting evidence when the statement is tagged as false. Our work relies on an inference method on a knowledge graph (KG) to identify the truthfulness of statements. In order to extract the evidence of falseness, the proposed algorithm takes into account combined knowledge from KG and ontologies. The system shows very good results as it provides valid and concise evidence. The quality of KG plays a role in the performance of the inference method which explicitly affects the performance of our evidence-extracting algorithm.
Datafication concept: definitions and examples - Apiumhub
Datafication is a buzzword of the last several years, that is used actively along Big Data industry. Honestly, if you would search the term'datafication' on the internet you probably won't find that much relative information about it, yet it is a word we are hearing a lot these days. However, after analyzing the topic itself, I could say that many of us understand the meaning of the term, but probably named it another way. Datafication, according to MayerSchoenberger and Cukier is the transformation of social action into online quantified data, thus allowing for real-time tracking and predictive analysis. Simply said, it is about taking previously invisible process/activity and turning it into data, that can be monitored, tracked, analysed and optimised.
Stream Reasoning in Temporal Datalog
Ronca, Alessandro (University of Oxford) | Kaminski, Mark (University of Oxford) | Grau, Bernardo Cuenca (University of Oxford) | Motik, Boris (University of Oxford) | Horrocks, Ian (University of Oxford)
Consider a number of wind turbines scattered throughout the North Sea. Each turbine is equipped with a Query processing over data streams is a key aspect of Big sensor, which continuously records temperature levels of key Data applications. For instance, algorithmic trading relies on devices within the turbine and sends those readings to a data real-time analysis of stock tickers and financial news items centre monitoring the functioning of the turbines. Temperature (Nuti et al. 2011); oil and gas companies continuously monitor levels are streamed by sensors using a ternary predicate and analyse data coming from their wellsites in order Temp, whose arguments identify the device, the temperature to detect equipment malfunction and predict maintenance level, and the time of the reading. A monitoring task in the needs (Cosad et al. 2009); network providers perform realtime data centre is to track the activation of cooling measures in analysis of network flow data to identify traffic anomalies each turbine, record temperature-induced malfunctions and and DoS attacks (Münz and Carle 2007).
On the Satisfiability Problem of Patterns in SPARQL 1.1
Zhang, Xiaowang (Tianjin University) | Bussche, Jan Van den (Hasselt University) | Wang, Kewen (Griffith University) | Wang, Zhe (Griffith University)
The pattern satisfiability is a fundamental problem for SPARQL. This paper provides a complete analysis of decidability/undecidability of satisfiability problems for SPARQL 1.1 patterns. A surprising result is the undecidability of satisfiability for SPARQL 1.1 patterns when only AND and MINUS are expressible. Also, it is shown that any fragment of SPARQL 1.1 without expressing both AND and MINUS is decidable. These results provide a guideline for future SPARQL query language design and implementation.
Forgetting and Unfolding for Existential Rules
Wang, Zhe (Griffith University) | Wang, Kewen (Griffith University) | Zhang, Xiaowang (Tianjin University)
Existential rules, a family of expressive ontology languages, inherit desired expressive and reasoning properties from both description logics and logic programming. On the other hand, forgetting is a well studied operation for ontology reuse, obfuscation and analysis. Yet it is challenging to establish a theory of forgetting for existential rules. In this paper, we lay the foundation for a theory of forgetting for existential rules by developing a novel notion of unfolding. In particular, we introduce a definition of forgetting for existential rules in terms of query answering and provide a characterisation of forgetting by the unfolding. A result of forgetting may not be expressible in existential rules, and we then capture the expressibility of forgetting by a variant of boundedness. While the expressibility is undecidable in general, we identify a decidable fragment. Finally, we provide an algorithm for forgetting in this fragment.
Repairing Ontologies via Axiom Weakening
Troquard, Nicolas (Faculty of Computer Science, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano) | Confalonieri, Roberto (Smart Data Factory, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano) | Galliani, Pietro (Faculty of Computer Science, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano) | Peñaloza, Rafael (Faculty of Computer Science, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano) | Porello, Daniele (Faculty of Computer Science, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano) | Kutz, Oliver (Faculty of Computer Science, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano)
Ontology engineering is a hard and error-prone task, in which small changes may lead to errors, or even produce an inconsistent ontology. As ontologies grow in size, the need for automated methods for repairing inconsistencies while preserving as much of the original knowledge as possible increases. Most previous approaches to this task are based on removing a few axioms from the ontology to regain consistency. We propose a new method based on weakening these axioms to make them less restrictive, employing the use of refinement operators. We introduce the theoretical framework for weakening DL ontologies, propose algorithms to repair ontologies based on the framework, and provide an analysis of the computational complexity. Through an empirical analysis made over real-life ontologies, we show that our approach preserves significantly more of the original knowledge of the ontology than removing axioms.