Language agents have shown some ability to interact with an external environment, e.g., a virtual world such as ScienceWorld, to perform complex tasks, e.g., growing a plant, without the startup costs of reinforcement learning. However, despite their zero-shot capabilities, these agents to date do not continually improve over time beyond performance refinement on a specific task. Here we present CLIN, the first language-based agent to achieve this, so that it continually improves over multiple trials, including when both the environment and task are varied, and without requiring parameter updates. Our approach is to use a persistent, dynamic, textual memory centered on causal abstractions (rather than general "helpful hints") that is regularly updated after each trial so that the agent gradually learns useful knowledge for new trials. In the ScienceWorld benchmark, CLIN is able to continually improve on repeated trials on the same task and environment, outperforming state-of-the-art reflective language agents like Reflexion by 23 absolute points. CLIN can also transfer its learning to new environments (or new tasks), improving its zero-shot performance by 4 points (13 for new tasks) and can further improve performance there through continual memory updates, enhancing performance by an additional 17 points (7 for new tasks). This suggests a new architecture for agents built on frozen models that can still continually and rapidly improve over time.

Game theory offers an interpretable mathematical framework for modeling multi-agent interactions. However, its applicability in real-world robotics applications is hindered by several challenges, such as unknown agents' preferences and goals. To address these challenges, we show a connection between differential games, optimal control, and energy-based models and demonstrate how existing approaches can be unified under our proposed Energy-based Potential Game formulation. Building upon this formulation, this work introduces a new end-to-end learning application that combines neural networks for game-parameter inference with a differentiable game-theoretic optimization layer, acting as an inductive bias. The experiments using simulated mobile robot pedestrian interactions and real-world automated driving data provide empirical evidence that the game-theoretic layer improves the predictive performance of various neural network backbones.

Variational quantum algorithms represent a promising approach to quantum machine learning where classical neural networks are replaced by parametrized quantum circuits. However, both approaches suffer from a clear limitation, that is a lack of interpretability. Here, we present a variational method to quantize projective simulation (PS), a reinforcement learning model aimed at interpretable artificial intelligence. Decision making in PS is modeled as a random walk on a graph describing the agent's memory. To implement the quantized model, we consider quantum walks of single photons in a lattice of tunable Mach-Zehnder interferometers trained via variational algorithms. Using an example from transfer learning, we show that the quantized PS model can exploit quantum interference to acquire capabilities beyond those of its classical counterpart. Finally, we discuss the role of quantum interference for training and tracing the decision making process, paving the way for realizations of interpretable quantum learning agents.

Collaborative autonomous multi-agent systems covering a specified area have many potential applications, such as UAV search and rescue, forest fire fighting, and real-time high-resolution monitoring. Traditional approaches for such coverage problems involve designing a model-based control policy based on sensor data. However, designing model-based controllers is challenging, and the state-of-the-art classical control policy still exhibits a large degree of sub-optimality. In this paper, we present a reinforcement learning (RL) approach for the multi-agent efficient domain coverage problem involving agents with second-order dynamics. Our approach is based on the Multi-Agent Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithm (MAPPO). Our proposed network architecture includes the incorporation of LSTM and self-attention, which allows the trained policy to adapt to a variable number of agents. Our trained policy significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art classical control policy. We demonstrate our proposed method in a variety of simulated experiments.

Constrained environments are common in practical applications of manipulating deformable linear objects (DLOs), where movements of both DLOs and robots should be constrained. This task is high-dimensional and highly constrained owing to the highly deformable DLOs, dual-arm robots with high degrees of freedom, and 3-D complex environments, which render global planning challenging. Furthermore, accurate DLO models needed by planning are often unavailable owing to their strong nonlinearity and diversity, resulting in unreliable planned paths. This article focuses on the global moving and shaping of DLOs in constrained environments by dual-arm robots. The main objectives are 1) to efficiently and accurately accomplish this task, and 2) to achieve generalizable and robust manipulation of various DLOs. To this end, we propose a complementary framework with whole-body planning and control using appropriate DLO model representations. First, a global planner is proposed to efficiently find feasible solutions based on a simplified DLO energy model, which considers the full system states and all constraints to plan more reliable paths. Then, a closed-loop manipulation scheme is proposed to compensate for the modeling errors and enhance the robustness and accuracy, which incorporates a model predictive controller that real-time adjusts the robot motion based on an adaptive DLO motion model. The key novelty is that our framework can efficiently solve the high-dimensional problem subject to multiple constraints and generalize to various DLOs without elaborate model identifications. Experiments demonstrate that our framework can accomplish considerably more complicated tasks than existing works, with significantly higher efficiency, generalizability, and reliability.

Despite considerable theoretical progress in the training of neural networks viewed as a multi-agent system of neurons, particularly concerning biological plausibility and decentralized training, their applicability to real-world problems remains limited due to scalability issues. In contrast, error-backpropagation has demonstrated its effectiveness for training deep networks in practice. In this study, we propose a local objective for neurons that, when pursued by neurons individually, align them to exhibit similarities to error-backpropagation in terms of efficiency and scalability during training. For this purpose, we examine a neural network comprising decentralized, self-interested neurons seeking to maximize their local objective -- attention from subsequent layer neurons -- and identify the optimal strategy for neurons. We also analyze the relationship between this strategy and backpropagation, establishing conditions under which the derived strategy is equivalent to error-backpropagation. Lastly, we demonstrate the learning capacity of these multi-agent neural networks through experiments on three datasets and showcase their superior performance relative to error-backpropagation in a catastrophic forgetting benchmark.

Large language models (LLMs) have enabled remarkable advances in automated task-solving with multi-agent systems. However, most existing LLM-based multi-agent approaches rely on predefined agents to handle simple tasks, limiting the adaptability of multi-agent collaboration to different scenarios. Therefore, we introduce AutoAgents, an innovative framework that adaptively generates and coordinates multiple specialized agents to build an AI team according to different tasks. Specifically, AutoAgents couples the relationship between tasks and roles by dynamically generating multiple required agents based on task content and planning solutions for the current task based on the generated expert agents. Multiple specialized agents collaborate with each other to efficiently accomplish tasks. Concurrently, an observer role is incorporated into the framework to reflect on the designated plans and agents' responses and improve upon them. Our experiments on various benchmarks demonstrate that AutoAgents generates more coherent and accurate solutions than the existing multi-agent methods. This underscores the significance of assigning different roles to different tasks and of team cooperation, offering new perspectives for tackling complex tasks. The repository of this project is available at https://github.com/Link-AGI/AutoAgents.

Discrete fair division has recently received significant attention due to its applications in a wide variety of multi-agent settings; see recent surveys [2, 27, 4]. Given a set of indivisible items and a set of n agents with diverse preferences, the goal is to find an allocation that is fair (i.e., acceptable by all agents) and efficient (i.e., non-wasteful). We assume that agents have additive valuations. The standard economic efficiency notion is Pareto-optimality (PO) and its strengthening fractional Pareto-optimality (fPO). Fairness notions based on envy [15] are most popular, where an allocation is said to be envy-free (EF) if every agent weakly prefers her bundle to any other agent's bundle. Since EF allocations need not exist (e.g., dividing one item among two agents), its relaxations envy-free up to any item (EFX) [10] and envy-free up to one item (EF1) [23, 9] are most widely used, where EF EFX EF1.

We introduce a model for multi-agent interaction problems to understand how a heterogeneous team of agents should organize its resources to tackle a heterogeneous team of attackers. This model is inspired by how the human immune system tackles a diverse set of pathogens. The key property of this model is a "cross-reactivity" kernel which enables a particular defender type to respond strongly to some attacker types but weakly to a few different types of attackers. We show how due to such cross-reactivity, the defender team can optimally counteract a heterogeneous attacker team using very few types of defender agents, and thereby minimize its resources. We study this model in different settings to characterize a set of guiding principles for control problems with heterogeneous teams of agents, e.g., sensitivity of the harm to sub-optimal defender distributions, and competition between defenders gives near-optimal behavior using decentralized computation of the control. We also compare this model with existing approaches including reinforcement-learned policies, perimeter defense, and coverage control.

This paper provides a solution to the problem of safe region formation control with reference velocity tracking for a second-order multi-agent system without velocity measurements. Safe region formation control is a control problem where the agents are expected to attain the desired formation while reaching the target region and simultaneously ensuring collision and obstacle avoidance. To tackle this control problem, we break it down into two distinct objectives: safety and region formation control, to provide a completely distributed algorithm. Region formation control is modeled as a high-level abstract objective, whereas safety and actuator saturation are modeled as a low-level objective designed independently, without any knowledge of the former, and being minimally invasive. Our approach incorporates connectivity preservation, actuator saturation, safety considerations, and lack of velocity measurement from other agents with second-order system dynamics which are important constraints in practical applications. Both internal safety for collision avoidance among agents and external safety for avoiding unsafe regions are ensured using exponential control barrier functions. We provide theoretical results for asymptotic convergence and numerical simulation to show the approach's effectiveness.