However, natural language generation with encoder-decoder based methods but depends is still a challenging task due to a number on the used architecture. Moreover, architectures of factors that include the absence of local information with higher quality of information decomposition continuity and non-smooth disentangled perform better in terms of the style transfer task.

Auto-regressive sequence-to-sequence models with attention mechanism have achieved state-of-the-art performance in many tasks such as machine translation and speech synthesis. These models can be difficult to train. The standard approach, teacher forcing, guides a model with reference output history during training. The problem is that the model is unlikely to recover from its mistakes during inference, where the reference output is replaced by generated output. Several approaches deal with this problem, largely by guiding the model with generated output history. To make training stable, these approaches often require a heuristic schedule or an auxiliary classifier. This paper introduces attention forcing, which guides the model with generated output history and reference attention. This approach can train the model to recover from its mistakes, in a stable fashion, without the need for a schedule or a classifier. In addition, it allows the model to generate output sequences aligned with the references, which can be important for cascaded systems like many speech synthesis systems. Experiments on speech synthesis show that attention forcing yields significant performance gain. Experiments on machine translation show that for tasks where various re-orderings of the output are valid, guiding the model with generated output history is challenging, while guiding the model with reference attention is beneficial.

Overparameterized transformer networks have obtained state of the art results in various natural language processing tasks, such as machine translation, language modeling, and question answering. These models contain hundreds of millions of parameters, necessitating a large amount of computation and making them prone to overfitting. In this work, we explore LayerDrop, a form of structured dropout, which has a regularization effect during training and allows for efficient pruning at inference time. In particular, we show that it is possible to select sub-networks of any depth from one large network without having to finetune them and with limited impact on performance. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach by improving the state of the art on machine translation, language modeling, summarization, question answering, and language understanding benchmarks. Moreover, we show that our approach leads to small BERT-like models of higher quality compared to training from scratch or using distillation.

Reference corpus for word alignment is an important resource for developing and evaluating word alignment methods. For Myanmar - English language pairs, there is no reference corpus to evaluate the word alignment tasks. Therefore, we created the guidelines f or Myanmar - English word alignment annotation between two languages over contrastive learning and built the Myanmar - English reference corpus consisting of verified alignments from Myanmar ALT of the Asian Language Treebank (ALT). This reference corpus conta ins confident labels sure (S) and possible (P) for word alignments which are used to test for the purpose of evaluation of the word alignments tasks. We discuss the most linking ambiguities to define consistent and systematic instructions to align manual w ords. We evaluated the results of annotators agreement using our reference corpus in terms of alignment error rate (AER) in word alignment tasks and discuss the words relationships in terms of BLEU scores. A bilingual corpus aligned at the level of sentences or words is a precious resource for developing machine translation systems. Word alignment is a fundamental step in extracting translation information from bilingual corpus and determines which words and phrases are translations of each other in the original and translated sentence. In most translation systems, translational correspondences are rather complex; for a language pair such as Myanmar and Eng lish that belong to the different word order languages.

The recent submission of Google TPU-v3 Pods to the industry wide MLPerf v0.6 training benchmark demonstrates the scalability of a suite of industry relevant ML models. MLPerf defines a suite of models, datasets and rules to follow when benchmarking to ensure results are comparable across hardware, frameworks and companies. Using this suite of models, we discuss the optimizations and techniques including choice of optimizer, spatial partitioning and weight update sharding necessary to scale to 1024 TPU chips. Furthermore, we identify properties of models that make scaling them challenging, such as limited data parallelism and unscaled weights. These optimizations contribute to record performance in transformer, Resnet-50 and SSD in the Google MLPerf-0.6 submission.

An increasingly popular approach to alleviate this issue is to first learn general language representations on unlabeled data, which are then integrated in task-specific downstream systems. This approach was first popularized by word embeddings (Mikolov et al., 2013b; This work was performed during an internship at Facebook AI Research. Pennington et al., 2014), but has recently been superseded by sentence-level representations (Peters et al., 2018; Devlin et al., 2019). Nevertheless, all these works learn a separate model for each language and are thus unable to leverage information across different languages, greatly limiting their potential performance for low-resource languages. In this work, we are interested in universal language agnostic sentence embeddings, that is, vector representations of sentences that are general with respect to two dimensions: the input language and the NLP task.

During my studies in engineering school in computer science, I had the opportunity to launch two entrepreneurship projects related to Machine Learning. The first is a project on the translation of sign languages into written languages through bracelets and an automated translation system. This project continues under the name of SignBand. Following my departure, I started to train in Machine Learning. I have taken several online courses and participated in several competitions on Kaggle and hackathons.

This study compares the effectiveness and robustness of multi-class categorization of Amazon product data using transfer learning on pre-trained contextualized language models. Specifically, we fine-tuned BERT and XLNet, two bidirectional models that have achieved state-of-the-art performance on many natural language tasks and benchmarks, including text classification. While existing classification studies and benchmarks focus on binary targets, with the exception of ordinal ranking tasks, here we examine the robustness of such models as the number of classes grows from 1 to 20. Our experiments demonstrate an approximately linear decrease in performance metrics (i.e., precision, recall, $F_1$ score, and accuracy) with the number of class labels. BERT consistently outperforms XLNet using identical hyperparameters on the entire range of class label quantities for categorizing products based on their textual descriptions. BERT is also more affordable than XLNet in terms of the computational cost (i.e., time and memory) required for training. In all cases studied, the performance degradation rates were estimated to be 1% per additional class label.

What are the risks and benefits of artificial intelligence? It's a complicated topic, but I'll try to unpack a few key points here. Let's start with a quick definition: AI is the simulation of human intelligence by machines. Example of AI systems used regularly in developed countries include Amazon's Alexa, smart replies in Gmail, Chatbots, predictive searches in Google, and recommendations. At a baseline level, AI helps improve our everyday lives by solving pain points, streamlining processes, and advancing human knowledge.

What are the risks and benefits of artificial intelligence? It's a complicated topic, but I'll try to unpack a few key points here. Let's start with a quick definition: AI is the simulation of human intelligence by machines. Example of AI systems used regularly in developed countries include Amazon's Alexa, smart replies in Gmail, Chatbots, predictive searches in Google, and recommendations. At a baseline level, AI helps improve our everyday lives by solving pain points, streamlining processes, and advancing human knowledge.