Large Language Model
Multi-Modal Forecaster: Jointly Predicting Time Series and Textual Data
Kim, Kai, Tsai, Howard, Sen, Rajat, Das, Abhimanyu, Zhou, Zihao, Tanpure, Abhishek, Luo, Mathew, Yu, Rose
Current forecasting approaches are largely unimodal and ignore the rich textual data that often accompany the time series due to lack of well-curated multimodal benchmark dataset. In this work, we develop TimeText Corpus (TTC), a carefully curated, time-aligned text and time dataset for multimodal forecasting. Our dataset is composed of sequences of numbers and text aligned to timestamps, and includes data from two different domains: climate science and healthcare. Our data is a significant contribution to the rare selection of available multimodal datasets. We also propose the Hybrid Multi-Modal Forecaster (Hybrid-MMF), a multimodal LLM that jointly forecasts both text and time series data using shared embeddings. However, contrary to our expectations, our Hybrid-MMF model does not outperform existing baselines in our experiments. This negative result highlights the challenges inherent in multimodal forecasting. Deep learning has become the predominant method in forecasting large-scale time series Zhou et al. (2022); Wang et al. (2022); Woo et al. (2023), but most existing methods consider time series as a single data modality. In practice, time series data do not exist in isolation and there are rich text meta-data available.
Receiver-Centric Generative Semantic Communications
Liu, Xunze, Sun, Yifei, Wang, Zhaorui, You, Lizhao, Pan, Haoyuan, Wang, Fangxin, Cui, Shuguang
This paper investigates semantic communications between a transmitter and a receiver, where original data, such as videos of interest to the receiver, is stored at the transmitter. Although significant process has been made in semantic communications, a fundamental design problem is that the semantic information is extracted based on certain criteria at the transmitter alone, without considering the receiver's specific information needs. As a result, critical information of primary concern to the receiver may be lost. In such cases, the semantic transmission becomes meaningless to the receiver, as all received information is irrelevant to its interests. To solve this problem, this paper presents a receiver-centric generative semantic communication system, where each transmission is initialized by the receiver. Specifically, the receiver first sends its request for the desired semantic information to the transmitter at the start of each transmission. Then, the transmitter extracts the required semantic information accordingly. A key challenge is how the transmitter understands the receiver's requests for semantic information and extracts the required semantic information in a reasonable and robust manner. We address this challenge by designing a well-structured framework and leveraging off-the-shelf generative AI products, such as GPT-4, along with several specialized tools for detection and estimation. Evaluation results demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed new semantic communication system.
On Targeted Manipulation and Deception when Optimizing LLMs for User Feedback
Williams, Marcus, Carroll, Micah, Narang, Adhyyan, Weisser, Constantin, Murphy, Brendan, Dragan, Anca
As LLMs become more widely deployed, there is increasing interest in directly optimizing for feedback from end users (e.g. thumbs up) in addition to feedback from paid annotators. However, training to maximize human feedback creates a perverse incentive structure for the AI to resort to manipulative or deceptive tactics to obtain positive feedback from users who are vulnerable to such strategies. We study this phenomenon by training LLMs with Reinforcement Learning with simulated user feedback in environments of practical LLM usage. In our settings, we find that: 1) Extreme forms of "feedback gaming" such as manipulation and deception are learned reliably; 2) Even if only 2% of users are vulnerable to manipulative strategies, LLMs learn to identify and target them while behaving appropriately with other users, making such behaviors harder to detect; 3) To mitigate this issue, it may seem promising to leverage continued safety training or LLM-as-judges during training to filter problematic outputs. Instead, we found that while such approaches help in some of our settings, they backfire in others, sometimes even leading to subtler manipulative behaviors. We hope our results can serve as a case study which highlights the risks of using gameable feedback sources -- such as user feedback -- as a target for RL.
Redefining in Dictionary: Towards an Enhanced Semantic Understanding of Creative Generation
Feng, Fu, Xie, Yucheng, Yang, Xu, Wang, Jing, Geng, Xin
Given the challenge atively generated using
Long Term Memory: The Foundation of AI Self-Evolution
Jiang, Xun, Li, Feng, Zhao, Han, Wang, Jiaying, Shao, Jun, Xu, Shihao, Zhang, Shu, Chen, Weiling, Tang, Xavier, Chen, Yize, Wu, Mengyue, Ma, Weizhi, Wang, Mengdi, Chen, Tianqiao
Large language models (LLMs) like GPTs, trained on vast datasets, have demonstrated impressive capabilities in language understanding, reasoning, and planning, achieving human-level performance in various tasks. Most studies focus on enhancing these models by training on ever-larger datasets to build more powerful foundation models. While training stronger models is important, enabling models to evolve during inference is equally crucial, a process we refer to as AI self-evolution. Unlike large-scale training, self-evolution may rely on limited data or interactions. Inspired by the columnar organization of the human cerebral cortex, we hypothesize that AI models could develop cognitive abilities and build internal representations through iterative interactions with their environment. To achieve this, models need long-term memory (LTM) to store and manage processed interaction data. LTM supports self-evolution by representing diverse experiences across environments and agents. In this report, we explore AI self-evolution and its potential to enhance models during inference. We examine LTM's role in lifelong learning, allowing models to evolve based on accumulated interactions. We outline the structure of LTM and the systems needed for effective data retention and representation. We also classify approaches for building personalized models with LTM data and show how these models achieve self-evolution through interaction. Using LTM, our multi-agent framework OMNE achieved first place on the GAIA benchmark, demonstrating LTM's potential for AI self-evolution. Finally, we present a roadmap for future research, emphasizing the importance of LTM for advancing AI technology and its practical applications.
Mono-InternVL: Pushing the Boundaries of Monolithic Multimodal Large Language Models with Endogenous Visual Pre-training
Luo, Gen, Yang, Xue, Dou, Wenhan, Wang, Zhaokai, Liu, Jiawen, Dai, Jifeng, Qiao, Yu, Zhu, Xizhou
In this paper, we focus on monolithic Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) that integrate visual encoding and language decoding into a single LLM. In particular, we identify that existing pre-training strategies for monolithic MLLMs often suffer from unstable optimization or catastrophic forgetting. To address this issue, our core idea is to embed a new visual parameter space into a pre-trained LLM, thereby stably learning visual knowledge from noisy data while freezing the LLM. Based on this principle, we present Mono-InternVL, a novel monolithic MLLM that seamlessly integrates a set of visual experts via a multimodal mixture-of-experts structure. Moreover, we propose an innovative pre-training strategy to maximize the visual capability of Mono-InternVL, namely Endogenous Visual Pre-training (EViP). In particular, EViP is designed as a progressive learning process for visual experts, which aims to fully exploit the visual knowledge from noisy data to high-quality data. To validate our approach, we conduct extensive experiments on 16 benchmarks. Experimental results confirm the superior performance of Mono-InternVL than existing monolithic MLLMs on 13 of 16 multimodal benchmarks, e.g., +80 points over Emu3 on OCRBench. Compared to the modular baseline, i.e., InternVL-1.5, Mono-InternVL still retains comparable multimodal performance while reducing up to 67% first token latency. Code and model are released at https://huggingface.co/OpenGVLab/Mono-InternVL-2B.
A Closer Look at Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models
Yuan, Xiaojian, Pang, Tianyu, Du, Chao, Chen, Kejiang, Zhang, Weiming, Lin, Min
Due to the high cost of retraining from scratch, researchers attempt to employ machine unlearning to remove specific content from LLMs while preserving the overall performance. In this paper, we discuss several issues in machine unlearning for LLMs and provide our insights on possible approaches. To address the issue of inadequate evaluation of model outputs after unlearning, we introduce three additional metrics to evaluate token diversity, sentence semantics, and factual correctness. We then categorize unlearning methods into untargeted and targeted, and discuss their issues respectively. Specifically, the behavior that untargeted unlearning attempts to approximate is unpredictable and may involve hallucinations, and existing regularization is insufficient for targeted unlearning. To alleviate these issues, we propose using the objective of maximizing entropy (ME) for untargeted unlearning and incorporate answer preservation (AP) loss as regularization for targeted unlearning. Experimental results across three scenarios, i.e., fictitious unlearning, continual unlearning, and real-world unlearning, demonstrate the effectiveness of our approaches. In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have undergone rapid development, demonstrating impressive capabilities across a wide range of applications, from natural language processing to complex problem-solving. These concerns are particularly relevant within legal and regulatory frameworks, such as the Right to be Forgotten (Dang, 2021), which aims to empower individuals to have unauthorized data erased from digital records. Addressing these issues is crucial for ensuring the responsible deployment of LLMs in real-world applications. Due to the high cost of retraining LLMs, researchers have explored machine unlearning techniques, namely LLM unlearning (Cao & Yang, 2015; Bourtoule et al., 2021; Yao et al., 2023). The typical paradigm involves fine-tuning the target LLM on a specified set, known as the forget set, to obtain an unlearned model. As described in (Maini et al., 2024; Jin et al., 2024), the unlearned model should meet two primary goals: 1) it should not reveal any information contained in the forget set, and 2) it should maintain performance on the neighbor set, which has a distribution similar to the forget set but is not the target of unlearning, as well as on other tasks with general knowledge. While the first goal is generally easier to achieve, the main challenge lies in meeting the second goal (Liu et al., 2024b; Maini et al., 2024; Zhang et al., 2024a; Ji et al., 2024; Shi et al., 2024a; Wang et al., 2024c). In this paper, we have a closer look at machine unlearning for LLMs. We note that most prior studies (Maini et al., 2024; Ji et al., 2024; Jia et al., 2024; Jin et al., 2024; Shi et al., 2024a) primarily rely on ROUGE (Lin, 2004) as the sole metric for evaluating the output of unlearned models.
No Free Delivery Service: Epistemic limits of passive data collection in complex social systems
Rapid model validation via the train-test paradigm has been a key driver for the breathtaking progress in machine learning and AI. However, modern AI systems often depend on a combination of tasks and data collection practices that violate all assumptions ensuring test validity. Yet, without rigorous model validation we cannot ensure the intended outcomes of deployed AI systems, including positive social impact, nor continue to advance AI research in a scientifically sound way. In this paper, I will show that for widely considered inference settings in complex social systems the train-test paradigm does not only lack a justification but is indeed invalid for any risk estimator, including counterfactual and causal estimators, with high probability. These formal impossibility results highlight a fundamental epistemic issue, i.e., that for key tasks in modern AI we cannot know whether models are valid under current data collection practices. Importantly, this includes variants of both recommender systems and reasoning via large language models, and neither na\"ive scaling nor limited benchmarks are suited to address this issue. I am illustrating these results via the widely used MovieLens benchmark and conclude by discussing the implications of these results for AI in social systems, including possible remedies such as participatory data curation and open science.
NewsHomepages: Homepage Layouts Capture Information Prioritization Decisions
Welsh, Ben, Zhou, Naitian, Kaz, Arda, Vu, Michael, Spangher, Alexander
Information prioritization plays an important role in how humans perceive and understand the world. Homepage layouts serve as a tangible proxy for this prioritization. In this work, we present NewsHomepages, a large dataset of over 3,000 new website homepages (including local, national and topic-specific outlets) captured twice daily over a three-year period. We develop models to perform pairwise comparisons between news items to infer their relative significance. To illustrate that modeling organizational hierarchies has broader implications, we applied our models to rank-order a collection of local city council policies passed over a ten-year period in San Francisco, assessing their "newsworthiness". Our findings lay the groundwork for leveraging implicit organizational Figure 1: Two "newsworthiness" signals that editors cues to deepen our understanding of make to guide reader attention are shown above.
OpenAI will pay DotDash Meredith at least 16 million per year to license its content
OpenAI is paying the digital media company Dotdash Meredith at least 16 million per year to license its content, according to public financial documents reviewed by Adweek. We already knew about this burgeoning partnership, but we didn't have a financial figure. The actual payout could rise above 16 million per year, as it only reflects the "fixed" component of the payment. The "variable" component will be calculated in the future, according to a recent earnings call led by the chief operating and financial officer of Dotdash Meredith's parent company IAC. "If you look at Q3 of 2024, licensing revenue was up about 4.1 million year over year. The lion's share of that would be driven by the OpenAI license," CFO Chris Halpin said.