Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Statistical Learning


Scalable and Flexible Multiview MAX-VAR Canonical Correlation Analysis

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Generalized canonical correlation analysis (GCCA) aims at finding latent low-dimensional common structure from multiple views (feature vectors in different domains) of the same entities. Unlike principal component analysis (PCA) that handles a single view, (G)CCA is able to integrate information from different feature spaces. Here we focus on MAX-VAR GCCA, a popular formulation which has recently gained renewed interest in multilingual processing and speech modeling. The classic MAX-VAR GCCA problem can be solved optimally via eigen-decomposition of a matrix that compounds the (whitened) correlation matrices of the views; but this solution has serious scalability issues, and is not directly amenable to incorporating pertinent structural constraints such as non-negativity and sparsity on the canonical components. We posit regularized MAX-VAR GCCA as a non-convex optimization problem and propose an alternating optimization (AO)-based algorithm to handle it. Our algorithm alternates between {\em inexact} solutions of a regularized least squares subproblem and a manifold-constrained non-convex subproblem, thereby achieving substantial memory and computational savings. An important benefit of our design is that it can easily handle structure-promoting regularization. We show that the algorithm globally converges to a critical point at a sublinear rate, and approaches a global optimal solution at a linear rate when no regularization is considered. Judiciously designed simulations and large-scale word embedding tasks are employed to showcase the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.


Semi-supervised model-based clustering with controlled clusters leakage

arXiv.org Machine Learning

In this paper, we focus on finding clusters in partially categorized data sets. We propose a semi-supervised version of Gaussian mixture model, called C3L, which retrieves natural subgroups of given categories. In contrast to other semi-supervised models, C3L is parametrized by user-defined leakage level, which controls maximal inconsistency between initial categorization and resulting clustering. Our method can be implemented as a module in practical expert systems to detect clusters, which combine expert knowledge with true distribution of data. Moreover, it can be used for improving the results of less flexible clustering techniques, such as projection pursuit clustering. The paper presents extensive theoretical analysis of the model and fast algorithm for its efficient optimization. Experimental results show that C3L finds high quality clustering model, which can be applied in discovering meaningful groups in partially classified data.


Linear Regression with Shuffled Labels

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Since at least the 19th century, linear regression has been widely used in statistics to infer the relationship between one more explanatory variables (or input features) and a continuous dependent variable (or label) [1, 2]. In the classical setting, linear regression is used on supervised datasets that are fully and individually labeled. Not all data fit this criterion, so, in recent years, the question of inference from weakly-supervised datasets has drawn attention in the machine learning community [3, 4, 5]. In weakly-supervised datasets, data are neither entirely labeled nor entirely unlabeled; a subset of the data may be labeled, as is the case in semi-supervised learning, or the data may be implicitly labeled, as occurs, for example, in multi-instance learning [6, 7]. Weakly-supervised datasets naturally arise in situations where obtaining labels for individual data is expensive or difficult; often times, it is significantly easier to conduct experiments that provide partial information. In this paper, we study one specific case of weakly-supervised data: shuffled data, in which all of the labels are observed, but the mutual ordering between the input features and the labels is unknown. Shuffled linear regression, then, can be described as a variant of traditional linear regression in which the labels are additionally perturbed by an unknown permutation.


Consistency of community detection in multi-layer networks using spectral and matrix factorization methods

arXiv.org Machine Learning

We consider the problem of estimating a consensus community structure by combining information from multiple layers of a multi-layer network or multiple snapshots of a time-varying network. Numerous methods have been proposed in the literature for the more general problem of multi-view clustering in the past decade based on the spectral clustering or a low-rank matrix factorization. As a general theme, these "intermediate fusion" methods involve obtaining a low column rank matrix by optimizing an objective function and then using the columns of the matrix for clustering. However, the theoretical properties of these methods remain largely unexplored and most researchers have relied on the performance in synthetic and real data to assess the goodness of the procedures. In the absence of statistical guarantees on the objective functions, it is difficult to determine if the algorithms optimizing the objective will return a good community structure. We apply some of these methods for consensus community detection in multi-layer networks and investigate the consistency properties of the global optimizer of the objective functions under the multi-layer stochastic blockmodel. We derive several new asymptotic results showing consistency of the intermediate fusion techniques along with the spectral clustering of mean adjacency matrix under a high dimensional setup, where the number of nodes, the number of layers and the number of communities of the multi-layer graph grow. Our numerical study shows that in comparison to the intermediate fusion techniques, late fusion methods, namely spectral clustering on aggregate spectral kernel and module allegiance matrix, under-perform in sparse networks, while the spectral clustering of mean adjacency matrix under-performs in multi-layer networks that contain layers with both homophilic and heterophilic clusters.


Parametric Gaussian Process Regression for Big Data

arXiv.org Machine Learning

This work introduces the concept of parametric Gaussian processes (PGPs), which is built upon the seemingly self-contradictory idea of making Gaussian processes parametric. Parametric Gaussian processes, by construction, are designed to operate in "big data" regimes where one is interested in quantifying the uncertainty associated with noisy data. The proposed methodology circumvents the well-established need for stochastic variational inference, a scalable algorithm for approximating posterior distributions. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is demonstrated using an illustrative example with simulated data and a benchmark dataset in the airline industry with approximately 6 million records.


Projected Semi-Stochastic Gradient Descent Method with Mini-Batch Scheme under Weak Strong Convexity Assumption

arXiv.org Machine Learning

We propose a projected semi-stochastic gradient descent method with mini-batch for improving both the theoretical complexity and practical performance of the general stochastic gradient descent method (SGD). We are able to prove linear convergence under weak strong convexity assumption. This requires no strong convexity assumption for minimizing the sum of smooth convex functions subject to a compact polyhedral set, which remains popular across machine learning community. Our PS2GD preserves the low-cost per iteration and high optimization accuracy via stochastic gradient variance-reduced technique, and admits a simple parallel implementation with mini-batches. Moreover, PS2GD is also applicable to dual problem of SVM with hinge loss.


Which machine learning algorithm should I use?

#artificialintelligence

This resource is designed primarily for beginner to intermediate data scientists or analysts who are interested in identifying and applying machine learning algorithms to address the problems of their interest. A typical question asked by a beginner, when facing a wide variety of machine learning algorithms, is "which algorithm should I use?" Even an experienced data scientist cannot tell which algorithm will perform the best before trying different algorithms. We are not advocating a one and done approach, but we do hope to provide some guidance on which algorithms to try first depending on some clear factors. The machine learning algorithm cheat sheet helps you to choose from a variety of machine learning algorithms to find the appropriate algorithm for your specific problems.


Efficient Spatio-Temporal Gaussian Regression via Kalman Filtering

arXiv.org Machine Learning

In this work we study the non-parametric reconstruction of spatio-temporal dynamical Gaussian processes (GPs) via GP regression from sparse and noisy data. GPs have been mainly applied to spatial regression where they represent one of the most powerful estimation approaches also thanks to their universal representing properties. Their extension to dynamical processes has been instead elusive so far since classical implementations lead to unscalable algorithms. We then propose a novel procedure to address this problem by coupling GP regression and Kalman filtering. In particular, assuming space/time separability of the covariance (kernel) of the process and rational time spectrum, we build a finite-dimensional discrete-time state-space process representation amenable of Kalman filtering. With sampling over a finite set of fixed spatial locations, our major finding is that the Kalman filter state at instant $t_k$ represents a sufficient statistic to compute the minimum variance estimate of the process at any $t \geq t_k$ over the entire spatial domain. This result can be interpreted as a novel Kalman representer theorem for dynamical GPs. We then extend the study to situations where the set of spatial input locations can vary over time. The proposed algorithms are finally tested on both synthetic and real field data, also providing comparisons with standard GP and truncated GP regression techniques.


Amobee at SemEval-2017 Task 4: Deep Learning System for Sentiment Detection on Twitter

arXiv.org Machine Learning

This paper describes the Amobee sentiment analysis system, adapted to compete in SemEval 2017 task 4. The system consists of two parts: a supervised training of RNN models based on a Twitter sentiment treebank, and the use of feedforward NN, Naive Bayes and logistic regression classifiers to produce predictions for the different sub-tasks. The algorithm reached the 3rd place on the 5-label classification task (sub-task C).


Mass Volume Curves and Anomaly Ranking

arXiv.org Machine Learning

This paper aims at formulating the issue of ranking multivariate unlabeled observations depending on their degree of abnormality as an unsupervised statistical learning task. In the 1-d situation, this problem is usually tackled by means of tail estimation techniques: univariate observations are viewed as all the more 'abnormal' as they are located far in the tail(s) of the underlying probability distribution. It would be desirable as well to dispose of a scalar valued 'scoring' function allowing for comparing the degree of abnormality of mul-tivariate observations. Here we formulate the issue of scoring anomalies as a M-estimation problem by means of a novel functional performance criterion, referred to as the Mass Volume curve (MV curve in short), whose optimal elements are strictly increasing transforms of the density. We first study the statistical estimation of the MV curve of a given scoring function and we provide a strategy to build confidence regions using a smoothed bootstrap approach. Optimization of this functional criterion over the set of piecewise constant scoring functions is next tackled. This boils down to estimating a sequence of empirical minimum volume sets whose levels are chosen adaptively from the data, so as to adjust to the variations of the optimal MV curve, while controling the bias of its approximation by a stepwise curve. Generalization bounds are then established for the difference in sup norm between the MV curve of the empirical scoring function thus obtained and the optimal MV curve.