Time series is a sequence of numerical data points in successive order and time series analysis is the technique of analysing the available data to predict the future outcome of an application. At present, time series analysis has been utilised in a number of applications, including stock market analysis, economic forecasting, pattern recognition, and sales forecasting. Here is a list of top ten Python tools, in no particular order, for Time Series Analysis. About: Arrow is a Python library that offers a human-friendly approach to creating, manipulating, formatting and converting dates, times and timestamps. The library implements and updates the datetime type, plugging gaps in functionality and providing an intelligent module API that supports many common creation scenarios. About: Cesium is an open source library that allows users to extract features from raw time series data, build machine learning models from these features, as well as generate predictions for new data.

Self Supervised Learning is an interesting research area where the goal is to learn rich representations from unlabeled data without any human annotation. This can be achieved by creatively formulating a problem such that you use parts of the data itself as labels and try to predict that. Such formulations are called pretext tasks. For example, you can setup a pretext task to predict the color version of the image given the grayscale version. Similarly, you could remove a part of the image and train a model to predict the part from the surrounding.

The K-Means clustering algorithm is an unsupervised learning algorithm meaning that it has no target labels. It is very tricky to choose the best "K" value. But one way of doing it is the elbow method. According to this method, the sum of squared error (SSE) is calculated for some values of "K". The SSE is the sum of the squared distance between each data point of cluster and its centroid.

We live in a world where the globe is connected and communication made easy with the click of a button. In this social age, the evolution of the World Wide Web (www), characterized by the advancement of smartphones and semantic technology, has redefined social media as a retail platform and an indispensable marketing tool. Social media marketing (SMM) is a form of digital marketing that involves sharing content on social media platforms in an attempt to actualize a firm's branding, sales, and web traffic goals. Social media has become essential to helping brands connect to a wider range of customers, establish brand presence, and increase sales both in-store and online. Considering the size of this new virtual market, it comes as no surprise that marketers would choose to use social media to increase brand awareness.

As we rely on machine learning (ML) models to make more consequential decisions, the issue of ML models perpetuating or even exacerbating undesirable historical biases (e.g. In this paper, we focus on the problem of detecting violations of individual fairness in ML models. We formalize the problem as measuring the susceptibility of ML models against a form of adversarial attack and develop a suite of inference tools for the adversarial cost function. The tools allow auditors to assess the individual fairness of ML models in a statistically-principled way: form confidence intervals for the worst-case performance differential between similar individuals and test hypotheses of model fairness with (asymptotic) non-coverage/Type I error rate control. The problem of bias in machine learning systems is at the forefront of contemporary ML research. Numerous media outlets have scrutinized machine learning systems deployed in practice for violations of basic societal equality principles (Angwin et al., 2016; Dastin, 2018; Vigdor, 2019). In response researchers developed many formal definitions of algorithmic fairness along with algorithms for enforcing these definitions in ML models (Dwork et al., 2011; Hardt et al., 2016; Berk et al., 2017; Kusner et al., 2018; Ritov et al., 2017; Yurochkin et al., 2020). Despite the flurry of ML fairness research, the basic question of assessing fairness of a given ML model in a statistically principled way remains largely unexplored. In this paper we propose a statistically principled approach to assessing individual fairness (Dwork et al., 2011) of ML models.

Manual classification of IT service desk tickets may result in routing of the tickets to the wrong resolution group. Incorrect assignment of IT service desk tickets leads to reassignment of tickets, unnecessary resource utilization and delays the resolution time. Traditional machine learning algorithms can be used to automatically classify the IT service desk tickets. Service desk ticket classifier models can be trained by mining the historical unstructured ticket description and the corresponding label. The model can then be used to classify the new service desk ticket based on the ticket description. The performance of the traditional classifier systems can be further improved by using various ensemble of classification techniques. This paper brings out the three most popular ensemble methods ie, Bagging, Boosting and Voting ensemble for combining the predictions from different models to further improve the accuracy of the ticket classifier system. The performance of the ensemble classifier system is checked against the individual base classifiers using various performance metrics. Ensemble of classifiers performed well in comparison with the corresponding base classifiers. The advantages of building such an automated ticket classifier systems are simplified user interface, faster resolution time, improved productivity, customer satisfaction and growth in business. The real world service desk ticket data from a large enterprise IT infrastructure is used for our research purpose.

With there being many technical and ethical issues with artificial intelligence (AI) that involve marginalized communities, there is a growing interest for design methods used with marginalized people that may be transferable to the design of AI technologies. Participatory design (PD) is a design method that is often used with marginalized communities for the design of social development, policy, IT and other matters and solutions. However, there are issues with the current PD, raising concerns when it is applied to the design of technologies, including AI technologies. This paper argues for the use of PD for the design of AI technologies, and introduces and proposes a new PD, which we call agile participatory design, that not only can could be used for the design of AI and data-driven technologies, but also overcomes issues surrounding current PD and its use in the design of such technologies.

Point cloud analysis is still a challenging task due to the disorder and sparsity of samplings of their geometric structures from 3D sensors. In this paper, we introduce the homotopy equivalence relation (HER) to make the neural networks learn the data distribution from a high-dimension manifold. A shuffle operation is adopted to construct HER for its randomness and zero-parameter. In addition, inspired by prior works, we propose a local mutual information regularizer (LMIR) to cut off the trivial path that leads to a classification error from HER. LMIR utilizes mutual information to measure the distance between the original feature and HER transformed feature and learns common features in a contrastive learning scheme. Thus, we combine HER and LMIR to give our model the ability to learn non-Euclidean features from a high-dimension manifold. This is named the non-Euclidean feature learner. Furthermore, we propose a new heuristics and efficiency point sampling algorithm named ClusterFPS to obtain approximate uniform sampling but at faster speed. ClusterFPS uses a cluster algorithm to divide a point cloud into several clusters and deploy the farthest point sampling algorithm on each cluster in parallel. By combining the above methods, we propose a novel point cloud analysis neural network called PointShuffleNet (PSN), which shows great promise in point cloud classification and segmentation. Extensive experiments show that our PSN achieves state-of-the-art results on ModelNet40, ShapeNet and S3DIS with high efficiency. Theoretically, we provide mathematical analysis toward understanding of what the data distribution HER has developed and why LMIR can drop the trivial path by maximizing mutual information implicitly.

We consider the task of enforcing individual fairness in gradient boosting. Gradient boosting is a popular method for machine learning from tabular data, which arise often in applications where algorithmic fairness is a concern. At a high level, our approach is a functional gradient descent on a (distributionally) robust loss function that encodes our intuition of algorithmic fairness for the ML task at hand. Unlike prior approaches to individual fairness that only work with smooth ML models, our approach also works with non-smooth models such as decision trees. We show that our algorithm converges globally and generalizes. We also demonstrate the efficacy of our algorithm on three ML problems susceptible to algorithmic bias.

Discriminative analysis in neuroimaging by means of deep/machine learning techniques is usually tested with validation techniques, whereas the associated statistical significance remains largely under-developed due to their computational complexity. In this work, a non-parametric framework is proposed that estimates the statistical significance of classifications using deep learning architectures. In particular, a combination of autoencoders (AE) and support vector machines (SVM) is applied to: (i) a one-condition, within-group designs often of normal controls (NC) and; (ii) a two-condition, between-group designs which contrast, for example, Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients with NC (the extension to multi-class analyses is also included). A random-effects inference based on a label permutation test is proposed in both studies using cross-validation (CV) and resubstitution with upper bound correction (RUB) as validation methods. This allows both false positives and classifier overfitting to be detected as well as estimating the statistical power of the test. Several experiments were carried out using the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset, the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN) dataset, and a MCI prediction dataset. We found in the permutation test that CV and RUB methods offer a false positive rate close to the significance level and an acceptable statistical power (although lower using cross-validation). A large separation between training and test accuracies using CV was observed, especially in one-condition designs. This implies a low generalization ability as the model fitted in training is not informative with respect to the test set. We propose as solution by applying RUB, whereby similar results are obtained to those of the CV test set, but considering the whole set and with a lower computational cost per iteration.