Originally published on Towards AI the World's Leading AI and Technology News and Media Company. If you are building an AI-related product or service, we invite you to consider becoming an AI sponsor. At Towards AI, we help scale AI and technology startups. Let us help you unleash your technology to the masses. It's free, we don't spam, and we never share your email address.

Data Science interviews vary in their depth. Some interviews go really deep and test the candidates on their knowledge of advanced models or tricky fine-tuning. But many interviews are conducted at an entry level, trying to test the basic knowledge of the candidate. In this article we will see a question that can be discussed in such an interview. Even though the question is very simple, the discussion brings up many interesting aspects of the fundamentals of machine learning. Question: What is the difference between Linear Regression and Logistic Regression? There are actually many similarities between the two, starting with the fact that their names are very similar sounding.

Artificial Intelligence involves all the characteristic operations of the human intellect and performed by computers, such as planning, language understanding, recognition of objects and sounds, learning and problem solving. Very interesting is the relationship between AI and IoT (Internet of Things) similar to that between brain and human body: our body through i various sensory inputs such as sight and touch, can recognize certain situations by performing the corresponding actions driven by our brain. Similarly in the IoT which, through sensors connected in the field, it sends a set of information to a guided control system by Artificial Intelligence that takes the appropriate decisions and eventually activates the actuators for controlling various movements (for example robot arms). Machine learning, on the other hand, is a way to implement Intelligence Artificial, while in-depth learning or Deep Learning, is one of many approaches related to machine learning. Machine learning is an application of AI that enables systems to learn and improve from experience without being explicitly programmed.

Data science and machine learning are two concepts that fall within the field of technology and using data to further how we create and innovate products, services, infrastructural systems, and more. Both correspond with career paths that are in-demand and high-earning. The two relate to each other in a similar way that squares are rectangles, but rectangles are not squares. Data science is the all-encompassing rectangle, while machine learning is a square that is its own entity. They are both often used by data scientists in their work and are rapidly being adopted by nearly every industry.

I Can't Believe It's Not Better: Understanding Deep Learning Through Empirical Falsification Workshop Organizers include: Javier Antorán Panelists include: Kevin Murphy

Neural sequence models, especially transformers, exhibit a remarkable capacity for in-context learning. They can construct new predictors from sequences of labeled examples $(x, f(x))$ presented in the input without further parameter updates. We investigate the hypothesis that transformer-based in-context learners implement standard learning algorithms implicitly, by encoding smaller models in their activations, and updating these implicit models as new examples appear in the context. Using linear regression as a prototypical problem, we offer three sources of evidence for this hypothesis. First, we prove by construction that transformers can implement learning algorithms for linear models based on gradient descent and closed-form ridge regression. Second, we show that trained in-context learners closely match the predictors computed by gradient descent, ridge regression, and exact least-squares regression, transitioning between different predictors as transformer depth and dataset noise vary, and converging to Bayesian estimators for large widths and depths. Third, we present preliminary evidence that in-context learners share algorithmic features with these predictors: learners' late layers non-linearly encode weight vectors and moment matrices. These results suggest that in-context learning is understandable in algorithmic terms, and that (at least in the linear case) learners may rediscover standard estimation algorithms. Code and reference implementations released at this $\href{https://github.com/ekinakyurek/google-research/blob/master/incontext}{http\,link}$.

Approximation of entropies of various types using machine learning (ML) regression methods are shown for the first time. The ML models presented in this study define the complexity of the short time series by approximating dissimilar entropy techniques such as Singular value decomposition entropy (SvdEn), Permutation entropy (PermEn), Sample entropy (SampEn) and Neural Network entropy (NNetEn) and their 2D analogies. A new method for calculating SvdEn2D, PermEn2D and SampEn2D for 2D images was tested using the technique of circular kernels. Training and testing datasets on the basis of Sentinel-2 images are presented (two training images and one hundred and ninety-eight testing images). The results of entropy approximation are demonstrated using the example of calculating the 2D entropy of Sentinel-2 images and R^2 metric evaluation. The applicability of the method for the short time series with a length from N = 5 to N = 113 elements is shown. A tendency for the R^2 metric to decrease with an increase in the length of the time series was found. For SvdEn entropy, the regression accuracy is R^2 > 0.99 for N = 5 and R^2 > 0.82 for N = 113. The best metrics were observed for the ML_SvdEn2D and ML_NNetEn2D models. The results of the study can be used for fundamental research of entropy approximations of various types using ML regression, as well as for accelerating entropy calculations in remote sensing. The versatility of the model is shown on a synthetic chaotic time series using Planck map and logistic map.

We develop a Bayesian semi-parametric model for the estimating the impact of dynamic treatment rules on survival among patients diagnosed with pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The data consist of a subset of patients enrolled in the phase III AAML1031 clinical trial in which patients move through a sequence of four treatment courses. At each course, they undergo treatment that may or may not include anthracyclines (ACT). While ACT is known to be effective at treating AML, it is also cardiotoxic and can lead to early death for some patients. Our task is to estimate the potential survival probability under hypothetical dynamic ACT treatment strategies, but there are several impediments. First, since ACT was not randomized in the trial, its effect on survival is confounded over time. Second, subjects initiate the next course depending on when they recover from the previous course, making timing potentially informative of subsequent treatment and survival. Third, patients may die or drop out before ever completing the full treatment sequence. We develop a generative Bayesian semi-parametric model based on Gamma Process priors to address these complexities. At each treatment course, the model captures subjects' transition to subsequent treatment or death in continuous time under a given rule. A g-computation procedure is used to compute a posterior over potential survival probability that is adjusted for time-varying confounding. Using this approach, we conduct posterior inference for the efficacy of hypothetical treatment rules that dynamically modify ACT based on evolving cardiac function.

Transfer learning uses a data model, trained to make predictions or inferences on data from one population, to make reliable predictions or inferences on data from another population. Most existing transfer learning approaches are based on fine-tuning pre-trained neural network models, and fail to provide crucial uncertainty quantification. We develop a statistical framework for model predictions based on transfer learning, called RECaST. The primary mechanism is a Cauchy random effect that recalibrates a source model to a target population; we mathematically and empirically demonstrate the validity of our RECaST approach for transfer learning between linear models, in the sense that prediction sets will achieve their nominal stated coverage, and we numerically illustrate the method's robustness to asymptotic approximations for nonlinear models. Whereas many existing techniques are built on particular source models, RECaST is agnostic to the choice of source model. For example, our RECaST transfer learning approach can be applied to a continuous or discrete data model with linear or logistic regression, deep neural network architectures, etc. Furthermore, RECaST provides uncertainty quantification for predictions, which is mostly absent in the literature. We examine our method's performance in a simulation study and in an application to real hospital data.

Understanding of the pathophysiology of obstructive lung disease (OLD) is limited by available methods to examine the relationship between multi-omic molecular phenomena and clinical outcomes. Integrative factorization methods for multi-omic data can reveal latent patterns of variation describing important biological signal. However, most methods do not provide a framework for inference on the estimated factorization, simultaneously predict important disease phenotypes or clinical outcomes, nor accommodate multiple imputation. To address these gaps, we propose Bayesian Simultaneous Factorization (BSF). We use conjugate normal priors and show that the posterior mode of this model can be estimated by solving a structured nuclear norm-penalized objective that also achieves rank selection and motivates the choice of hyperparameters. We then extend BSF to simultaneously predict a continuous or binary response, termed Bayesian Simultaneous Factorization and Prediction (BSFP). BSF and BSFP accommodate concurrent imputation and full posterior inference for missing data, including "blockwise" missingness, and BSFP offers prediction of unobserved outcomes. We show via simulation that BSFP is competitive in recovering latent variation structure, as well as the importance of propagating uncertainty from the estimated factorization to prediction. We also study the imputation performance of BSF via simulation under missing-at-random and missing-not-at-random assumptions. Lastly, we use BSFP to predict lung function based on the bronchoalveolar lavage metabolome and proteome from a study of HIV-associated OLD. Our analysis reveals a distinct cluster of patients with OLD driven by shared metabolomic and proteomic expression patterns, as well as multi-omic patterns related to lung function decline. Software is freely available at https://github.com/sarahsamorodnitsky/BSFP .