Time series forecasting models often exhibit inconsistent performance across datasets with varying statistical and structural properties. Despite the wide range of available forecasting techniques, it remains unclear whether model selection can be reliably guided by simple data characteristics. This paper investigates why rule-based model selection fails in time series forecasting by analyzing the relationship between data-regime descriptors and model performance. A descriptor-based framework is introduced to characterize time series using measurable properties, including trend strength, seasonality, noise level, and temporal dependence. Based on these descriptors, a rule-based selection mechanism is formulated to map data regimes to candidate forecasting models. The approach is evaluated on multiple real-world datasets across different domains and forecasting horizons. The results show that rule-based model selection achieves low accuracy, with correct model identification occurring in only a small fraction of cases. Significant discrepancies are observed between recommended and empirically optimal models, particularly in noisy and mixed regimes. Further analysis reveals that model performance is highly sensitive to both dataset characteristics and forecasting horizon, resulting in substantial ranking instability across scenarios. These findings explain why simple heuristic rules fail to generalize and demonstrate that forecasting performance cannot be reliably predicted using static, descriptor-based approaches. This study provides empirical evidence that model selection in time series forecasting is inherently context-dependent and highlights the need for more adaptive, data-driven strategies.

We present a unified pipeline for univariate time series classification via complex networks and persistent homology. A time series is mapped to a graph through one of five constructions across three families--visibility (natural and horizontal visibility graphs), transition, and proximity--and the graph is converted to a dissimilarity matrix from which a Vietoris-Rips filtration yields persistence diagrams. These diagrams are vectorized into fixed-length features through persistence landscapes and topological summary statistics. By standardizing the downstream processing, differences in classification performance are attributable to the network construction and distance metric alone. Experiments on twelve UCR benchmarks show that (i) no single construction dominates: the optimal graph type depends on the signal's discriminative structure; (ii) the graph distance metric is a first-order design choice, with diffusion distance uniformly outperforming shortest-path alternatives; and (iii) persistence-based features degrade gracefully under noise, consistent with the classical stability theorem of persistent homology.

Self-normalized martingale inequalities lie at the heart of confidence ellipsoids for online least squares and, more broadly, many bandit and reinforcement-learning results. Yet existing vector and scalar results typically rely on bounded covariates and an explicit regularization matrix, producing bounds that are \emph{not scale-invariant}: although the self-normalized quantity is scale-invariant by definition, its standard upper bounds are not. We characterize when scale-invariant upper bounds on self-normalized martingales are possible. Without further assumptions, we prove that nontrivial scale-invariant bounds exist only in dimension $d=1$; moreover, in $d=1$ we obtain $O(\log T)$ scale-invariant self-normalized bounds without any assumptions on the covariates. In contrast, for $d>1$ we show that no nontrivial scale-invariant bound can hold in full generality. We then connect this dichotomy to \emph{doubly-uniform} regret in online linear regression (i.e., regret bounds that are simultaneously independent of the covariate scale and the comparator norm) and use it to resolve the open question of Gaillard, Gerchinovitz, Huard, and Stoltz, \emph{``Uniform regret bounds over $\mathbb{R}^d$ for the sequential linear regression problem with the square loss''} (ALT 2019): in $d=1$ we give an explicit algorithm with $O(\log T)$ doubly-uniform regret, whereas for $d>1$ sublinear doubly-uniform regret is impossible. Finally, under a natural \emph{smoothness} condition (bounded Radon--Nikodym derivatives of the conditional covariate laws with respect to a fixed base measure), we recover sublinear regret for $d>1$ without bounded covariates and derive a self-normalized concentration inequality free of the usual regularization penalties, yielding arguably a first natural scale-invariant bound for adaptive, non-i.i.d. vector martingales.

Missing data imputation remains a fundamental challenge in modern data science, especially when uncertainty quantification is essential. In this work, we propose MissBGM, an AI-powered missing data imputation method via Bayesian generative modeling that bridges the expressive flexibility of neural networks with the statistical rigor of Bayesian inference. Unlike existing methods that often focus on point estimates or treat the missingness mechanism implicitly, MissBGM explicitly and jointly models the data-generating and missingness mechanisms, providing principled posterior uncertainty over imputations rather than a single point estimate. We develop a stochastic optimization framework with alternating updates among missing values, model parameters, and latent variables until convergence. Our theoretical analysis shows that estimates of missing values from MissBGM converge consistently under mild assumptions. Empirically, we demonstrate that MissBGM achieves superior performance over traditional imputers and recent neural network-based methods across extensive experimental settings. These results establish MissBGM as a principled and scalable solution for modern missing data imputation.

We consider the problem of two-sample testing in a semi-supervised setting with abundant unlabeled covariate data. Standard two-sample tests neglect covariate information, which has the potential to significantly boost performance. However, incorporating covariates potentially breaks the exchangeability assumption under the null, which further complicates a calibration procedure. To address these issues, we propose a semi-supervised method that produces a test statistic with asymptotic normality, while effectively integrating additional information from covariates. Our test is straightforward to calibrate due to the asymptotic normality under the null and achieves asymptotic power that is often much higher than existing kernel tests without covariates. Furthermore, we formally show that the proposed method is consistent in power against fixed and local alternatives. Simulations confirm the practical and theoretical strengths of our approach.

We study clustered multitask learning in a semiparametric setting where tasks share a latent cluster structure in their target parameters but exhibit heterogeneous, potentially infinite-dimensional nuisance components. Such heterogeneity poses a major challenge for existing multitask learning methods, which typically rely on aligned feature spaces or homogeneous task structures. To address this challenge, we propose an adaptive fused orthogonal estimator that integrates Neyman-orthogonal losses with data-driven pairwise fusion penalties. Our framework leverages task-specific pilot estimates to calibrate the fusion penalties and combines adaptive aggregation with orthogonalization to mitigate the impact of nuisance-parameter estimation error. Theoretically, we show that the proposed estimator achieves exact recovery of the latent clustering with high probability and attains pooled parametric convergence rates proportional to cluster size. Moreover, we establish asymptotic normality and show that, asymptotically, our estimator matches the performance of an oracle procedure that knows the true clustering in advance. Empirically, we show that the proposed method consistently outperforms strong baselines in various simulation setups. A real-world application to U.S. residential energy consumption demonstrates the effectiveness of our approach in uncovering meaningful regional clustering in electricity price elasticity, showcasing the efficacy of our method.

Extreme value theory provides rigorous theory and statistical tools for extrapolation in machine learning, particularly in settings where traditional methods struggle due to data scarcity in the tails. A broad range of tasks benefit from these advances, including regression and classification beyond the training data, extreme quantile regression, supervised and unsupervised dimension reduction, generative artificial intelligence and anomaly detection. This review synthesizes recent developments in these fields at the intersection of statistical learning and extreme value theory, with a focus on principled methods based on asymptotically motivated representations of the tail of univariate and multivariate distributions. We consider different theoretical frameworks for both asymptotically dependent and independent data and discuss how they translate into efficient statistical methods for extrapolation to extreme regions. By addressing both theoretical and practical aspects, we offer a comprehensive overview of the state-of-the-art in this quickly evolving field, and identify promising directions for future research.

We introduce Mira, a sample-based score for assessing the accuracy of a candidate conditional distribution using only joint samples from the true data-generating process. Relying on the principle that distributions coincide if they assign equal probability mass to all regions, we derive an analytic expression for the Mira statistic, whose average defines the Mira score. This formulation further allows us to compute theoretical reference values and uncertainty estimates when the candidate distribution matches the true one. This framework enables model comparison by quantifying the alignment between the conditional distribution of a candidate model and the true data generating process. Consequently, Mira enables Bayesian model comparison through direct posterior validation, bypassing the challenging evidence computation. We demonstrate its effectiveness across several toy problems and Bayesian inference tasks.

This paper introduces the use of per-class regularization hyperparameters in Gabriel graph-based binary classifiers. We demonstrate how the quality index used for regularization behaves both in the margin region and in the presence of outliers, and how incorporating this regularization flexibility can lead to solutions that effectively eliminate outliers while training the classifier. We also show how it can address class imbalance by generating higher and lower thresholds for the majority and minority classes, respectively. Thus, rather than having a single solution based on fixed thresholds, flexible thresholds expand the solution space and can be optimized through hyperparameter tuning algorithms. Friedman test shows that flexible thresholds are capable of improving Gabriel graph-based classifiers.

We study feature selection in high-dimensional regression under two distinct sources of instability: sampling variability and measurement error in the design matrix. Stability Selection addresses the former through sub-sampling and aggregation, but does not explicitly stress-test robustness to noisy predictors. We introduce doubly stable feature selection, a perturb-and-aggregate framework that targets features whose inclusion is stable both across randomization and across increasing levels of design noise. The method injects controlled additive noise into the design matrix, fits a fixed base selector such as the Lasso on the perturbed data, and aggregates selection frequencies. Sweeping over a grid of noise levels yields a stability path that summarizes robustness to measurement error while using the full sample size and isolating the effect of design perturbations. On the theory side, we show that classical model-selection conditions are preserved under sufficiently small perturbations, with a high-probability extension for Gaussian noise. Empirically, experiments on synthetic and real datasets show improved robustness compared with Stability Selection and standard base selectors.