Statistical Learning
Best-First Model Merging for Dynamic Learning and Recognition
Stephen M. Omohundro International Computer Science Institute 1947 CenteJ' Street, Suite 600 Berkeley, California 94704 Abstract "Best-first model merging" is a general technique for dynamically choosing the structure of a neural or related architecture while avoiding overfitting.It is applicable to both leaming and recognition tasks and often generalizes significantly better than fixed structures. We demonstrate theapproach applied to the tasks of choosing radial basis functions for function learning, choosing local affine models for curve and constraint surface modelling, and choosing the structure of a balltree or bumptree to maximize efficiency of access. 1 TOWARD MORE COGNITIVE LEARNING Standard backpropagation neural networks learn in a way which appears to be quite different fromhuman leaming. Viewed as a cognitive system, a standard network always maintains acomplete model of its domain. This model is mostly wrong initially, but gets gradually better and better as data appears. The net deals with all data in much the same way and has no representation for the strength of evidence behind a certain conclusion. The network architecture is usually chosen before any data is seen and the processing is much the same in the early phases of learning as in the late phases.
A Network of Localized Linear Discriminants
The localized linear discriminant network (LLDN) has been designed to address classification problems containing relatively closely spaced data from different classes (encounter zones [1], the accuracy problem [2]). Locally trained hyperplane segmentsare an effective way to define the decision boundaries for these regions [3]. The LLD uses a modified perceptron training algorithm for effective discovery of separating hyperplane/sigmoid units within narrow boundaries. The basic unit of the network is the discriminant receptive field (DRF) which combines the LLD function with Gaussians representing the dispersion of the local training data with respect to the hyperplane. The DRF implements a local distance measure [4],and obtains the benefits of networks oflocalized units [5]. A constructive algorithm for the two-class case is described which incorporates DRF's into the hidden layer to solve local discrimination problems. The output unit produces a smoothed, piecewise linear decision boundary. Preliminary results indicate the ability of the LLDN to efficiently achieve separation when boundaries are narrow and complex, in cases where both the "standard" multilayer perceptron (MLP) and k-nearest neighbor (KNN) yield high error rates on training data. 1 The LLD Training Algorithm and DRF Generation The LLD is defined by the hyperplane normal vector V and its "midpoint" M (a translated origin [1] near the center of gravity of the training data in feature space). Incremental corrections to V and M accrue for each training token feature vector Yj in the training set, as iIlustrated in figure 1 (exaggerated magnitudes).
Gradient Descent: Second Order Momentum and Saturating Error
We then regard gradient descent with momentum as a dynamic system and explore a non quadratic error surface, showing that saturation of the error accounts for a variety of effects observed in simulations and justifies some popular heuristics. 1 INTRODUCTION Gradient descent is the bread-and-butter optimization technique in neural networks. Some people build special purpose hardware to accelerate gradient descent optimization ofbackpropagation networks. Understanding the dynamics of gradient descent on such surfaces is therefore of great practical value. Here we briefly review the known results in the convergence of batch gradient descent; showthat second-order momentum does not give any speedup; simulate a real network and observe some effect not predicted by theory; and account for these effects by analyzing gradient descent with momentum on a saturating error surface.
Knowledge Discovery in Databases: An Overview
Frawley, William J., Piatetsky-Shapiro, Gregory, Matheus, Christopher J.
After a decade of fundamental interdisciplinary research in machine learning, the spadework in this field has been done; the 1990s should see the widespread exploitation of knowledge discovery as an aid to assembling knowledge bases. The contributors to the AAAI Press book Knowledge Discovery in Databases were excited at the potential benefits of this research. The editors hope that some of this excitement will communicate itself to "AI Magazine readers of this article.
A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers
Boser, B. | Guyon, I. | Vapnik, V. N.
A training algorithm that maximizes the margin between the training patterns and the decision boundary is presented. The technique is applicable to a wide variety of the classification functions, including Perceptrons, polynomials, and Radial Basis Functions. The effective number of parameters is adjusted automatically to match the complexity of the problem. The solution is expressed as a linear combination of supporting patterns. These are the subset of training patterns that are closest to the decision boundary.
Asymptotic slowing down of the nearest-neighbor classifier
Snapp, Robert R., Psaltis, Demetri, Venkatesh, Santosh S.
M2/n' for sufficiently large values of M. Here, Poo(error) denotes the probability of error in the infinite sample limit, and is at most twice the error of a Bayes classifier. Although the value of the coefficient a depends upon the underlying probability distributions, the exponent of M is largely distribution free. We thus obtain a concise relation between a classifier's ability to generalize from a finite reference sample and the dimensionality of the feature space, as well as an analytic validation of Bellman's well known "curse of dimensionality." 1 INTRODUCTION One of the primary tasks assigned to neural networks is pattern classification. Common applications include recognition problems dealing with speech, handwritten characters, DNA sequences, military targets, and (in this conference) sexual identity. Two fundamental concepts associated with pattern classification are generalization (how well does a classifier respond to input data it has never encountered before?) and scalability (how are a classifier's processing and training requirements affected by increasing the number of features that describe the input patterns?).
Oriented Non-Radial Basis Functions for Image Coding and Analysis
Saha, Avijit, Christian, Jim, Tang, Dun-Sung, Chuan-Lin, Wu
We introduce oriented non-radial basis function networks (ONRBF) as a generalization of Radial Basis Function networks (RBF)- wherein the Euclidean distance metric in the exponent of the Gaussian is replaced by a more general polynomial. This permits the definition of more general regions and in particular-hyper-ellipses with orientations. In the case of hyper-surface estimation this scheme requires a smaller number of hidden units and alleviates the "curse of dimensionality" associated kernel type approximators.In the case of an image, the hidden units correspond to features in the image and the parameters associated with each unit correspond to the rotation, scaling and translation properties of that particular "feature". In the context of the ONBF scheme, this means that an image can be represented by a small number of features. Since, transformation of an image by rotation, scaling and translation correspond to identical transformations of the individual features, the ONBF scheme can be used to considerable advantage for the purposes of image recognition and analysis.