Transduction is an inference principle that takes a training sample and aims at estimating the values of a function at given points contained in the so-called working sample as opposed to the whole of input space for induction. Transduction provides a confidence measure on single predictions rather than classifiers - a feature particularly important for risk-sensitive applications. The possibly infinite number of functions is reduced to a finite number of equivalence classes on the working sample. A rigorous Bayesian analysis reveals that for standard classification loss we cannot benefit from considering more than one test point at a time. The probability of the label of a given test point is determined as the posterior measure of the corresponding subset of hypothesis space. We consider the PAC setting of binary classification by linear discriminant functions (perceptrons) in kernel space such that the probability of labels is determined by the volume ratio in version space. We suggest to sample this region by an ergodic billiard. Experimental results on real world data indicate that Bayesian Transduction compares favourably to the well-known Support Vector Machine, in particular if the posterior probability of labellings is used as a confidence measure to exclude test points of low confidence.

Suppose you are given some dataset drawn from an underlying probability distribution P and you want to estimate a "simple" subset S of input space such that the probability that a test point drawn from P lies outside of S equals some a priori specified

Recently, sample complexity bounds have been derived for problems involving linear functions such as neural networks and support vector machines. In this paper, we extend some theoretical results in this area by deriving dimensional independent covering number bounds for regularized linear functions under certain regularization conditions. We show that such bounds lead to a class of new methods for training linear classifiers with similar theoretical advantages of the support vector machine. Furthermore, we also present a theoretical analysis for these new methods from the asymptotic statistical point of view. This technique provides better description for large sample behaviors of these algorithms.

One of the open questions that remains is how to set the'tunable' parameters of an SVM algorithm: While methods for choosing the width of the kernel function and the noise parameter C (which controls how closely the training data are fitted) have been proposed [4, 5] (see also, very recently, [6]), the effect of the overall shape of the kernel function remains imperfectly understood [1]. Error bars (class probabilities) for SVM predictions - important for safety-critical applications, for example - are also difficult to obtain. In this paper I suggest that a probabilistic interpretation of SVMs could be used to tackle these problems. It shows that the SVM kernel defines a prior over functions on the input space, avoiding the need to think in terms of high-dimensional feature spaces. It also allows one to define quantities such as the evidence (likelihood) for a set of hyperparameters (C, kernel amplitude Ko etc). I give a simple approximation to the evidence which can then be maximized to set such hyperparameters. The evidence is sensitive to the values of C and Ko individually, in contrast to properties (such as cross-validation error) of the deterministic solution, which only depends on the product CKo. It can thfrefore be used to assign an unambiguous value to C, from which error bars can be derived.

A new method for multivariate density estimation is developed based on the Support Vector Method (SVM) solution of inverse ill-posed problems. The solution has the form of a mixture of densities. This method with Gaussian kernels compared favorably to both Parzen's method and the Gaussian Mixture Model method. For synthetic data we achieve more accurate estimates for densities of 2, 6, 12, and 40 dimensions. 1 Introduction The problem of multivariate density estimation is important for many applications, in particular, for speech recognition [1] [7]. When the unknown density belongs to a parametric set satisfying certain conditions one can estimate it using the maximum likelihood (ML) method. Often these conditions are too restrictive. Therefore, nonparametric methods were proposed. The most popular of these, Parzen's method [5], uses the following estimate given data

We give necessary and sufficient conditions for uniqueness of the support vector solution for the problems of pattern recognition and regression estimation, for a general class of cost functions. We show that if the solution is not unique, all support vectors are necessarily at bound, and we give some simple examples of non-unique solutions. We note that uniqueness of the primal (dual) solution does not necessarily imply uniqueness of the dual (primal) solution. We show how to compute the threshold b when the solution is unique, but when all support vectors are at bound, in which case the usual method for determining b does not work. 1 Introduction Support vector machines (SVMs) have attracted wide interest as a means to implement structural risk minimization for the problems of classification and regression estimation. The fact that training an SVM amounts to solving a convex quadratic programming problem means that the solution found is global, and that if it is not unique, then the set of global solutions is itself convex; furthermore, if the objective function is strictly convex, the solution is guaranteed to be unique [1]1.

Suppose you are given some dataset drawn from an underlying probability distributionP and you want to estimate a "simple" subset S of input space such that the probability that a test point drawn from P lies outside of S equals some a priori specified

One of the open questions that remains is how to set the'tunable' parameters of an SVM algorithm: While methods forchoosing the width of the kernel function and the noise parameter C (which controls how closely the training data are fitted) have been proposed [4, 5] (see also, very recently, [6]), the effect of the overall shape of the kernel function remains imperfectly understood [1]. Error bars (class probabilities) for SVM predictions - important for safety-critical applications, for example - are also difficult to obtain. In this paper I suggest that a probabilistic interpretation of SVMs could be used to tackle these problems. It shows that the SVM kernel defines a prior over functions on the input space, avoiding the need to think in terms of high-dimensional feature spaces. It also allows one to define quantities such as the evidence (likelihood) for a set of hyperparameters (C, kernel amplitude Ko etc). I give a simple approximation to the evidence which can then be maximized to set such hyperparameters. The evidence is sensitive to the values of C and Ko individually, in contrast to properties (such as cross-validation error) of the deterministic solution, which only depends on the product CKo. It can thfrefore be used to assign an unambiguous value to C, from which error bars can be derived.

Recently, sample complexity bounds have been derived for problems involving linearfunctions such as neural networks and support vector machines. In this paper, we extend some theoretical results in this area by deriving dimensional independent covering number bounds for regularized linearfunctions under certain regularization conditions. We show that such bounds lead to a class of new methods for training linear classifiers withsimilar theoretical advantages of the support vector machine. Furthermore, we also present a theoretical analysis for these new methods fromthe asymptotic statistical point of view. This technique provides better description for large sample behaviors of these algorithms. 1 Introduction In this paper, we are interested in the generalization performance of linear classifiers obtained fromcertain algorithms.

Transduction is an inference principle that takes a training sample andaims at estimating the values of a function at given points contained in the so-called working sample as opposed to the whole of input space for induction. Transduction provides a confidence measure on single predictions rather than classifiers - a feature particularly important for risk-sensitive applications. The possibly infinite number of functions is reduced to a finite number of equivalence classeson the working sample. A rigorous Bayesian analysis reveals that for standard classification loss we cannot benefit from considering more than one test point at a time. The probability of the label of a given test point is determined as the posterior measure of the corresponding subset of hypothesis space.