Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Regression


4 Reasons Why You Shouldn't Use Machine Learning - KDnuggets

#artificialintelligence

When machine learning initially emerged, many speculated that it would spark another industrial revolution. Fast forward to today and many would say that it's nothing more than a buzzword. Machine learning is a useful tool, but it's nothing more than that. And it's a stretch to say that it's anything like a swiss army knife -- I'd think of it more like a water jet (something rather niche). From my experiences, there are certainly a number of applications where machine learning shines.


Mismatch-first Farthest-search in Active Learning

#artificialintelligence

Originally published on Towards AI the World's Leading AI and Technology News and Media Company. If you are building an AI-related product or service, we invite you to consider becoming an AI sponsor. At Towards AI, we help scale AI and technology startups. Let us help you unleash your technology to the masses. Active Learning is one of the teaching strategies which engage learners (e.g.


Two Instances of Interpretable Neural Network for Universal Approximations

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

This paper proposes two bottom-up interpretable neural network (NN) constructions for universal approximation, namely Triangularly-constructed NN (TNN) and Semi-Quantized Activation NN (SQANN). The notable properties are (1) resistance to catastrophic forgetting (2) existence of proof for arbitrarily high accuracies on training dataset (3) for an input \(x\), users can identify specific samples of training data whose activation ``fingerprints" are similar to that of \(x\)'s activations. Users can also identify samples that are out of distribution.


Artificial Intelligence and Statistical Techniques in Short-Term Load Forecasting: A Review

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Electrical utilities depend on short-term demand forecasting to proactively adjust production and distribution in anticipation of major variations. This systematic review analyzes 240 works published in scholarly journals between 2000 and 2019 that focus on applying Artificial Intelligence (AI), statistical, and hybrid models to short-term load forecasting (STLF). This work represents the most comprehensive review of works on this subject to date. A complete analysis of the literature is conducted to identify the most popular and accurate techniques as well as existing gaps. The findings show that although Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) continue to be the most commonly used standalone technique, researchers have been exceedingly opting for hybrid combinations of different techniques to leverage the combined advantages of individual methods. The review demonstrates that it is commonly possible with these hybrid combinations to achieve prediction accuracy exceeding 99%. The most successful duration for short-term forecasting has been identified as prediction for a duration of one day at an hourly interval. The review has identified a deficiency in access to datasets needed for training of the models. A significant gap has been identified in researching regions other than Asia, Europe, North America, and Australia.


Time varying regression with hidden linear dynamics

arXiv.org Machine Learning

The distribution of labels given the covariates changes over time in a variety of applications of regression. Some example domains where such problems arise include economics, marketing, fashion, and supply chain optimization, where market properties evolve over time. Motivated by such problems, we revisit a model for time-varying linear regression that assumes the unknown parameters evolve according to a linear dynamical system. One way to account for distribution change in linear regression is to assume that the unknown model parameters change slowly with time [2, 15, 37]. While this assumption simplifies the problem and makes it tractable, it misses on exploiting additional structure available and it also fails to model periodicity (e.g., due to seasonality) present in some problems. As an alternative, we are interested in a dynamic model previously studied by Chow [7], Carraro [5], and Shumway et al. [26].


A Literature Review on Length of Stay Prediction for Stroke Patients using Machine Learning and Statistical Approaches

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Hospital length of stay (LOS) is one of the most essential healthcare metrics that reflects the hospital quality of service and helps improve hospital scheduling and management. LOS prediction helps in cost management because patients who remain in hospitals usually do so in hospital units where resources are severely limited. In this study, we reviewed papers on LOS prediction using machine learning and statistical approaches. Our literature review considers research studies that focus on LOS prediction for stroke patients. Some of the surveyed studies revealed that authors reached contradicting conclusions. For example, the age of the patient was considered an important predictor of LOS for stroke patients in some studies, while other studies concluded that age was not a significant factor. Therefore, additional research is required in this domain to further understand the predictors of LOS for stroke patients. There are many challenges associated with growth in the healthcare sector, including increased pressure on the limited resources of hospitals. This issue has motivated researchers to conduct further research related to hospital resource optimization. Since hospitalization constitutes a significant cost of patient care, many researchers have been investigating the problem of patient Length of Stay (LOS) prediction.


Multivariate Trend Filtering for Lattice Data

arXiv.org Machine Learning

We study a multivariate version of trend filtering, called Kronecker trend filtering or KTF, for the case in which the design points form a lattice in $d$ dimensions. KTF is a natural extension of univariate trend filtering (Steidl et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2009; Tibshirani, 2014), and is defined by minimizing a penalized least squares problem whose penalty term sums the absolute (higher-order) differences of the parameter to be estimated along each of the coordinate directions. The corresponding penalty operator can be written in terms of Kronecker products of univariate trend filtering penalty operators, hence the name Kronecker trend filtering. Equivalently, one can view KTF in terms of an $\ell_1$-penalized basis regression problem where the basis functions are tensor products of falling factorial functions, a piecewise polynomial (discrete spline) basis that underlies univariate trend filtering. This paper is a unification and extension of the results in Sadhanala et al. (2016, 2017). We develop a complete set of theoretical results that describe the behavior of $k^{\mathrm{th}}$ order Kronecker trend filtering in $d$ dimensions, for every $k \geq 0$ and $d \geq 1$. This reveals a number of interesting phenomena, including the dominance of KTF over linear smoothers in estimating heterogeneously smooth functions, and a phase transition at $d=2(k+1)$, a boundary past which (on the high dimension-to-smoothness side) linear smoothers fail to be consistent entirely. We also leverage recent results on discrete splines from Tibshirani (2020), in particular, discrete spline interpolation results that enable us to extend the KTF estimate to any off-lattice location in constant-time (independent of the size of the lattice $n$).


Omitted Variable Bias in Machine Learned Causal Models

arXiv.org Machine Learning

We derive general, yet simple, sharp bounds on the size of the omitted variable bias for a broad class of causal parameters that can be identified as linear functionals of the conditional expectation function of the outcome. Such functionals encompass many of the traditional targets of investigation in causal inference studies, such as, for example, (weighted) average of potential outcomes, average treatment effects (including subgroup effects, such as the effect on the treated), (weighted) average derivatives, and policy effects from shifts in covariate distribution -- all for general, nonparametric causal models. Our construction relies on the Riesz-Frechet representation of the target functional. Specifically, we show how the bound on the bias depends only on the additional variation that the latent variables create both in the outcome and in the Riesz representer for the parameter of interest. Moreover, in many important cases (e.g, average treatment effects in partially linear models, or in nonseparable models with a binary treatment) the bound is shown to depend on two easily interpretable quantities: the nonparametric partial $R^2$ (Pearson's "correlation ratio") of the unobserved variables with the treatment and with the outcome. Therefore, simple plausibility judgments on the maximum explanatory power of omitted variables (in explaining treatment and outcome variation) are sufficient to place overall bounds on the size of the bias. Finally, leveraging debiased machine learning, we provide flexible and efficient statistical inference methods to estimate the components of the bounds that are identifiable from the observed distribution.


Bounding Wasserstein distance with couplings

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) provides asymptotically consistent estimates of intractable posterior expectations as the number of iterations tends to infinity. However, in large data applications, MCMC can be computationally expensive per iteration. This has catalyzed interest in sampling methods such as approximate MCMC, which trade off asymptotic consistency for improved computational speed. In this article, we propose estimators based on couplings of Markov chains to assess the quality of such asymptotically biased sampling methods. The estimators give empirical upper bounds of the Wassertein distance between the limiting distribution of the asymptotically biased sampling method and the original target distribution of interest. We establish theoretical guarantees for our upper bounds and show that our estimators can remain effective in high dimensions. We apply our quality measures to stochastic gradient MCMC, variational Bayes, and Laplace approximations for tall data and to approximate MCMC for Bayesian logistic regression in 4500 dimensions and Bayesian linear regression in 50000 dimensions.


Learning Across Bandits in High Dimension via Robust Statistics

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Decision-makers often face the "many bandits" problem, where one must simultaneously learn across related but heterogeneous contextual bandit instances. For instance, a large retailer may wish to dynamically learn product demand across many stores to solve pricing or inventory problems, making it desirable to learn jointly for stores serving similar customers; alternatively, a hospital network may wish to dynamically learn patient risk across many providers to allocate personalized interventions, making it desirable to learn jointly for hospitals serving similar patient populations. We study the setting where the unknown parameter in each bandit instance can be decomposed into a global parameter plus a sparse instance-specific term. Then, we propose a novel two-stage estimator that exploits this structure in a sample-efficient way by using a combination of robust statistics (to learn across similar instances) and LASSO regression (to debias the results). We embed this estimator within a bandit algorithm, and prove that it improves asymptotic regret bounds in the context dimension $d$; this improvement is exponential for data-poor instances. We further demonstrate how our results depend on the underlying network structure of bandit instances.