Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Reinforcement Learning



Appendix A Control algorithm The action-value function can be decomposed into two components as: Q (PT) (s, a) = Q (P) (s, a) + Q (T) w

Neural Information Processing Systems

We use induction to prove this statement. The penultimate step follows from the induction hypothesis completing the proof. Then, the fixed point of Eq.(5) is the value function of in f M . We focus on permanent value function in the next two theorems. The permanent value function is updated using Eq.




Explore to Generalize in Zero-Shot RL

Neural Information Processing Systems

Recent developments in reinforcement learning (RL) led to algorithms that surpass human experts in a broad range of tasks [Mnih et al., 2015, Vinyals et al., 2019, Schrittwieser et al., 2020, Wurman et al.,



Managing Temporal Resolution in Continuous Value Estimation: A Fundamental Trade-off

Neural Information Processing Systems

We address this gap by analyzing Monte-Carlo policy evaluation for LQR systems and uncover a fundamental trade-off between approximation and statistical error in value estimation.




Cal-QL: Calibrated Offline RL Pre-Training for Efficient Online Fine-Tuning

Neural Information Processing Systems

However, existing offline RL methods tend to behave poorly during fine-tuning. In this paper, we study the fine-tuning problem in the context of conservative offline RL methods and we devise an approach for learning an effective initialization from offline data that also enables fast online fine-tuning capabilities.