A BSTRACT When performing imitation learning from expert demonstrations, distribution matching is a popular approach, in which one alternates between estimating distribution ratios and then using these ratios as rewards in a standard reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm. Traditionally, estimation of the distribution ratio requires on-policy data, which has caused previous work to either be exorbitantly data-inefficient or alter the original objective in a manner that can drastically change its optimum. In this work, we show how the original distribution ratio estimation objective may be transformed in a principled manner to yield a completely off-policy objective. In addition to the data-efficiency that this provides, we are able to show that this objective also renders the use of a separate RL optimization unnecessary. Rather, an imitation policy may be learned directly from this objective without the use of explicit rewards. We call the resulting algorithm V alueDICEand evaluate it on a suite of popular imitation learning benchmarks, finding that it can achieve state-of-the-art sample efficiency and performance. Accordingly, many successful demonstrations of RL often rely on carefully handcrafted rewards with various bonuses and penalties designed to encourage intended behavior (Nachum et al., 2019a; Andrychowicz et al., 2018).

Q-learning with neural network function approximation (neural Q-learning for short) is among the most prevalent deep reinforcement learning algorithms. Despite its empirical success, the non-asymptotic convergence rate of neural Q-learning remains virtually unknown. In this paper, we present a finite-time analysis of a neural Q-learning algorithm, where the data are generated from a Markov decision process and the action-value function is approximated by a deep ReLU neural network. We prove that neural Q-learning finds the optimal policy with $O(1/\sqrt{T})$ convergence rate if the neural function approximator is sufficiently overparameterized, where $T$ is the number of iterations. To our best knowledge, our result is the first finite-time analysis of neural Q-learning under non-i.i.d. data assumption.

Lack of reliability is a well-known issue for reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms. This problem has gained increasing attention in recent years, and efforts to improve it have grown substantially. To aid RL researchers and production users with the evaluation and improvement of reliability, we propose a set of metrics that quantitatively measure different aspects of reliability. In this work, we focus on variability and risk, both during training and after learning (on a fixed policy). We designed these metrics to be general-purpose, and we also designed complementary statistical tests to enable rigorous comparisons on these metrics. In this paper, we first describe the desired properties of the metrics and their design, the aspects of reliability that they measure, and their applicability to different scenarios. We then describe the statistical tests and make additional practical recommendations for reporting results. The metrics and accompanying statistical tools have been made available as an open-source library, here: https://github.com/google-research/rl-reliability-metrics . We apply our metrics to a set of common RL algorithms and environments, compare them, and analyze the results.

By integrating dynamics models into model-free reinforcement learning (RL) methods, model-based value expansion (MVE) algorithms have shown a significant advantage in sample efficiency as well as value estimation. However, these methods suffer from higher function approximation errors than model-free methods in stochastic environments due to a lack of modeling the environmental randomness. As a result, their performance lags behind the best model-free algorithms in some challenging scenarios. In this paper, we propose a novel Hybrid-RL method that builds on MVE, namely the Risk Averse Value Expansion (RAVE). With imaginative rollouts generated by an ensemble of probabilistic dynamics models, we further introduce the aversion of risks by seeking the lower confidence bound of the estimation. Experiments on a range of challenging environments show that by modeling the uncertainty completely, RAVE substantially enhances the robustness of previous model-based methods, and yields state-of-the-art performance. With this technique, our solution gets the first place in NeurIPS 2019: Learn to Move.

The policy gradient theorem is defined based on an objective with respect to the initial distribution over states. In the discounted case, this results in policies that are optimal for one distribution over initial states, but may not be uniformly optimal for others, no matter where the agent starts from. Furthermore, to obtain unbiased gradient estimates, the starting point of the policy gradient estimator requires sampling states from a normalized discounted weighting of states. However, the difficulty of estimating the normalized discounted weighting of states, or the stationary state distribution, is quite well-known. Additionally, the large sample complexity of policy gradient methods is often attributed to insufficient exploration, and to remedy this, it is often assumed that the restart distribution provides sufficient exploration in these algorithms. In this work, we propose exploration in policy gradient methods based on maximizing entropy of the discounted future state distribution. The key contribution of our work includes providing a practically feasible algorithm to estimate the normalized discounted weighting of states, i.e, the \textit{discounted future state distribution}. We propose that exploration can be achieved by entropy regularization with the discounted state distribution in policy gradients, where a metric for maximal coverage of the state space can be based on the entropy of the induced state distribution. The proposed approach can be considered as a three time-scale algorithm and under some mild technical conditions, we prove its convergence to a locally optimal policy. Experimentally, we demonstrate usefulness of regularization with the discounted future state distribution in terms of increased state space coverage and faster learning on a range of complex tasks.

Abstract: Market makers play an important role in providing liquidity to markets by continuously quoting prices at which they are willing to buy and sell, and managing inventory risk. In this paper, we build a multi-agent simulation of a dealer market and demonstrate that it can be used to understand the behavior of a reinforcement learning (RL) based market maker agent. We use the simulator to train an RL-based market maker agent with different competitive scenarios, reward formulations and market price trends (drifts). We show that the reinforcement learning agent is able to learn about its competitor's pricing policy; it also learns to manage inventory by smartly selecting asymmetric prices on the buy and sell sides (skewing), and maintaining a positive (or negative) inventory depending on whether the market price drift is positive (or negative). Finally, we propose and test reward formulations for creating risk averse RL-based market maker agents.

Inverse reinforcement learning has proved its ability to explain state-action trajectories of expert agents by recovering their underlying reward functions in increasingly challenging environments. Recent advances in adversarial learning have allowed extending inverse RL to applications with non-stationary environment dynamics unknown to the agents, arbitrary structures of reward functions and improved handling of the ambiguities inherent to the ill-posed nature of inverse RL. This is particularly relevant in real time applications on stochastic environments involving risk, like volatile financial markets. Moreover, recent work on simulation of complex environments enable learning algorithms to engage with real market data through simulations of its latent space representations, avoiding a costly exploration of the original environment. In this paper, we explore whether adversarial inverse RL algorithms can be adapted and trained within such latent space simulations from real market data, while maintaining their ability to recover agent rewards robust to variations in the underlying dynamics, and transfer them to new regimes of the original environment.

We design a new provably efficient algorithm for episodic reinforcement learning with generalized linear function approximation. We analyze the algorithm under a new expressivity assumption that we call "optimistic closure," which is strictly weaker than assumptions from prior analyses for the linear setting. With optimistic closure, we prove that our algorithm enjoys a regret bound of $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{d^3 T})$ where $d$ is the dimensionality of the state-action features and $T$ is the number of episodes. This is the first statistically and computationally efficient algorithm for reinforcement learning with generalized linear functions.

Sparse representations have been shown to be useful in deep reinforcement learning for mitigating catastrophic interference and improving the performance of agents in terms of cumulative reward. Previous results were based on a two step process were the representation was learned offline and the action-value function was learned online afterwards. In this paper, we investigate if it is possible to learn a sparse representation and the action-value function simultaneously and incrementally. We investigate this question by employing several regularization techniques and observing how they affect sparsity of the representation learned by a DQN agent in two different benchmark domains. Our results show that with appropriate regularization it is possible to increase the sparsity of the representations learned by DQN agents. Moreover, we found that learning sparse representations also resulted in improved performance in terms of cumulative reward. Finally, we found that the performance of the agents that learned a sparse representation was more robust to the size of the experience replay buffer. This last finding supports the long standing hypothesis that the overlap in representations learned by deep neural networks is the leading cause of catastrophic interference.

Saliency maps have been used to support explanations of deep reinforcement learning (RL) agent behavior over temporally extended sequences. However, their use in the community indicates that the explanations derived from saliency maps are often unfalsifiable and can be highly subjective. We introduce an empirical approach grounded in counterfactual reasoning to test the hypotheses generated from saliency maps and assess the degree to which saliency maps represent semantics of RL environments. We evaluate three types of saliency maps using Atari games, a common benchmark for deep RL. Our results show the extent to which existing claims about Atari games can be evaluated and suggest that saliency maps are an exploratory tool not an explanatory tool.