Model-based Reinforcement Learning has shown considerable experimental success. However, a theoretical understanding of it is still lacking. To this end, we analyze the error in cumulative reward for both stochastic and deterministic transitions using a contraction approach. We show that this approach doesn't require strong assumptions and can recover the typical quadratic error to the horizon. We prove that branched rollouts can reduce this error and are essential for deterministic transitions to have a Bellman contraction. Our results also apply to Imitation Learning, where we prove that GAN-type learning is better than Behavioral Cloning in continuous state and action spaces.

We present a novel bilateral negotiation model that allows a self-interested agent to learn how to negotiate over multiple issues in the presence of user preference uncertainty. The model relies upon interpretable strategy templates representing the tactics the agent should employ during the negotiation and learns template parameters to maximize the average utility received over multiple negotiations, thus resulting in optimal bid acceptance and generation. Our model also uses deep reinforcement learning to evaluate threshold utility values, for those tactics that require them, thereby deriving optimal utilities for every environment state. To handle user preference uncertainty, the model relies on a stochastic search to find user model that best agrees with a given partial preference profile. Multi-objective optimization and multi-criteria decision-making methods are applied at negotiation time to generate Pareto-optimal outcomes thereby increasing the number of successful (win-win) negotiations. Rigorous experimental evaluations show that the agent employing our model outperforms the winning agents of the 10th Automated Negotiating Agents Competition (ANAC'19) in terms of individual as well as social-welfare utilities.

It is still common to use Q-learning and temporal difference (TD) learning-even though they have divergence issues and sound Gradient TD alternatives exist-because divergence seems rare and they typically perform well. However, recent work with large neural network learning systems reveals that instability is more common than previously thought. Practitioners face a difficult dilemma: choose an easy to use and performant TD method, or a more complex algorithm that is more sound but harder to tune and all but unexplored with non-linear function approximation or control. In this paper, we introduce a new method called TD with Regularized Corrections (TDRC), that attempts to balance ease of use, soundness, and performance. It behaves as well as TD, when TD performs well, but is sound in cases where TD diverges. We empirically investigate TDRC across a range of problems, for both prediction and control, and for both linear and non-linear function approximation, and show, potentially for the first time, that gradient TD methods could be a better alternative to TD and Q-learning.

We considered a novel practical problem of online learning with episodically revealed rewards, motivated by several real-world applications, where the contexts are nonstationary over different episodes and the reward feedbacks are not always available to the decision making agents. For this online semi-supervised learning setting, we introduced Background Episodic Reward LinUCB (BerlinUCB), a solution that easily incorporates clustering as a self-supervision module to provide useful side information when rewards are not observed. Our experiments on a variety of datasets, both in stationary and nonstationary environments of six different scenarios, demonstrated clear advantages of the proposed approach over the standard contextual bandit. Lastly, we introduced a relevant real-life example where this problem setting is especially useful.

Markov decision processes (MDP) are a well-known conceptual tool useful for modelling sequential decision processes and have been widely used in real-world applications such as adaptive production control (see e. g. Kuhnle et al. (2020)), equipment maintenance (see Barde et al. (2019), Liu et al. (2019)) or robot planning (see Veeramani et al. (2020)), to name a few. Usual optimization procedures take into account just a scalar value to be maximized. However, in many cases the objective function is more accurately described by a vector (see e. g. Gen and Lin (2014), Zhang and Xu (2017)) and multi-objective optimization must be applied.

We make progress in a long-standing problem of batch reinforcement learning (RL): learning $Q^\star$ from an exploratory and polynomial-sized dataset, using a realizable and otherwise arbitrary function class. In fact, all existing algorithms demand function-approximation assumptions stronger than realizability, and the mounting negative evidence has led to a conjecture that sample-efficient learning is impossible in this setting (Chen and Jiang, 2019). Our algorithm, BVFT, breaks the hardness conjecture (albeit under a stronger notion of exploratory data) via a tournament procedure that reduces the learning problem to pairwise comparison, and solves the latter with the help of a state-action partition constructed from the compared functions. We also discuss how BVFT can be applied to model selection among other extensions and open problems.

A remarkable characteristic of human intelligence is our ability to learn tasks quickly. Most humans can learn reasonably complex skills like tool-use and gameplay within just a few hours, and understand the basics after only a few attempts. This suggests that data-efficient learning may be a meaningful part of developing broader intelligence. On the other hand, Deep Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms can achieve superhuman performance on games like Atari, Starcraft, Dota, and Go, but require large amounts of data to get there. Achieving superhuman performance on Dota took over 10,000 human years of gameplay. Unlike simulation, skill acquisition in the real-world is constrained to wall-clock time.

This paper surveys the field of transfer learning in the problem setting of Reinforcement Learning (RL). RL has been the key solution to sequential decision-making problems. Along with the fast advance of RL in various domains. including robotics and game-playing, transfer learning arises as an important technique to assist RL by leveraging and transferring external expertise to boost the learning process. In this survey, we review the central issues of transfer learning in the RL domain, providing a systematic categorization of its state-of-the-art techniques. We analyze their goals, methodologies, applications, and the RL frameworks under which these transfer learning techniques would be approachable. We discuss the relationship between transfer learning and other relevant topics from an RL perspective and also explore the potential challenges as well as future development directions for transfer learning in RL.

Reasoning with declarative knowledge (RDK) and sequential decision-making (SDM) are two key research areas in artificial intelligence. RDK methods reason with declarative domain knowledge, including commonsense knowledge, that is either provided a priori or acquired over time, while SDM methods (probabilistic planning and reinforcement learning) seek to compute action policies that maximize the expected cumulative utility over a time horizon; both classes of methods reason in the presence of uncertainty. Despite the rich literature in these two areas, researchers have not fully explored their complementary strengths. In this paper, we survey algorithms that leverage RDK methods while making sequential decisions under uncertainty. We discuss significant developments, open problems, and directions for future work.

In this paper, we study the problem of balancing effectiveness and efficiency in automated feature selection. Feature selection is a fundamental intelligence for machine learning and predictive analysis. After exploring many feature selection methods, we observe a computational dilemma: 1) traditional feature selection methods (e.g., mRMR) are mostly efficient, but difficult to identify the best subset; 2) the emerging reinforced feature selection methods automatically navigate feature space to explore the best subset, but are usually inefficient. Are automation and efficiency always apart from each other? Can we bridge the gap between effectiveness and efficiency under automation? Motivated by such a computational dilemma, this study is to develop a novel feature space navigation method. To that end, we propose an Interactive Reinforced Feature Selection (IRFS) framework that guides agents by not just self-exploration experience, but also diverse external skilled trainers to accelerate learning for feature exploration. Specifically, we formulate the feature selection problem into an interactive reinforcement learning framework. In this framework, we first model two trainers skilled at different searching strategies: (1) KBest based trainer; (2) Decision Tree based trainer. We then develop two strategies: (1) to identify assertive and hesitant agents to diversify agent training, and (2) to enable the two trainers to take the teaching role in different stages to fuse the experiences of the trainers and diversify teaching process. Such a hybrid teaching strategy can help agents to learn broader knowledge, and, thereafter, be more effective. Finally, we present extensive experiments on real-world datasets to demonstrate the improved performances of our method: more efficient than existing reinforced selection and more effective than classic selection.