Over the years, reinforcement learning has emerged as a popular approach to develop signal control and vehicle platooning strategies either independently or in a hierarchical way. However, jointly controlling both in real-time to alleviate traffic congestion presents new challenges, such as the inherent physical and behavioral heterogeneity between signal control and platooning, as well as coordination between them. This paper proposes an innovative solution to tackle these challenges based on heterogeneous graph multi-agent reinforcement learning and traffic theories. Our approach involves: 1) designing platoon and signal control as distinct reinforcement learning agents with their own set of observations, actions, and reward functions to optimize traffic flow; 2) designing coordination by incorporating graph neural networks within multi-agent reinforcement learning to facilitate seamless information exchange among agents on a regional scale. We evaluate our approach through SUMO simulation, which shows a convergent result in terms of various transportation metrics and better performance over sole signal or platooning control.

Urban traffic congestion is a critical predicament that plagues modern road networks. To alleviate this issue and enhance traffic efficiency, traffic signal control and vehicle routing have proven to be effective measures. In this paper, we propose a joint optimization approach for traffic signal control and vehicle routing in signalized road networks. The objective is to enhance network performance by simultaneously controlling signal timings and route choices using Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning (MADRL). Signal control agents (SAs) are employed to establish signal timings at intersections, whereas vehicle routing agents (RAs) are responsible for selecting vehicle routes. By establishing relevance between agents and enabling them to share observations and rewards, interaction and cooperation among agents are fostered, which enhances individual training. The Multi-Agent Advantage Actor-Critic algorithm is used to handle multi-agent environments, and Deep Neural Network (DNN) structures are designed to facilitate the algorithm's convergence. Notably, our work is the first to utilize MADRL in determining the optimal joint policy for signal control and vehicle routing. Numerical experiments conducted on the modified Sioux network demonstrate that our integration of signal control and vehicle routing outperforms controlling signal timings or vehicles' routes alone in enhancing traffic efficiency. Key words: traffic congestion; signalized road networks; vehicle routing; signal control; multi-agent deep reinforcement learning 1. Introduction Traffic signal control and vehicle routing are recognized as effective measures to alleviate traffic congestion and enhance traffic efficiency in urban road networks. The signal settings are intrinsically linked to the route decisions made by drivers. This is because the traffic control system is designed to improve network performance, which is accomplished through a comprehensive analysis of the network flow patterns that encompasses drivers' route decisions.

The ability to learn good representations of states is essential for solving large reinforcement learning problems, where exploration, generalization, and transfer are particularly challenging. The Laplacian representation is a promising approach to address these problems by inducing intrinsic rewards for temporally-extended action discovery and reward shaping, and informative state encoding. To obtain the Laplacian representation one needs to compute the eigensystem of the graph Laplacian, which is often approximated through optimization objectives compatible with deep learning approaches. These approximations, however, depend on hyperparameters that are impossible to tune efficiently, converge to arbitrary rotations of the desired eigenvectors, and are unable to accurately recover the corresponding eigenvalues. In this paper we introduce a theoretically sound objective and corresponding optimization algorithm for approximating the Laplacian representation. Our approach naturally recovers both the true eigenvectors and eigenvalues while eliminating the hyperparameter dependence of previous approximations. We provide theoretical guarantees for our method and we show that those results translate empirically into robust learning across multiple environments.

Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) has shown promising results across several domains. Despite this promise, MARL policies often lack robustness and are therefore sensitive to small changes in their environment. This presents a serious concern for the real world deployment of MARL algorithms, where the testing environment may slightly differ from the training environment. In this work we show that we can gain robustness by controlling a policy's Lipschitz constant, and under mild conditions, establish the existence of a Lipschitz and close-to-optimal policy. Based on these insights, we propose a new robust MARL framework, ERNIE, that promotes the Lipschitz continuity of the policies with respect to the state observations and actions by adversarial regularization. The ERNIE framework provides robustness against noisy observations, changing transition dynamics, and malicious actions of agents. However, ERNIE's adversarial regularization may introduce some training instability. To reduce this instability, we reformulate adversarial regularization as a Stackelberg game. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework with extensive experiments in traffic light control and particle environments. In addition, we extend ERNIE to mean-field MARL with a formulation based on distributionally robust optimization that outperforms its non-robust counterpart and is of independent interest. Our code is available at https://github.com/abukharin3/ERNIE.

Our ultimate goal is to build robust policies for robots that assist people. What makes this hard is that people can behave unexpectedly at test time, potentially interacting with the robot outside its training distribution and leading to failures. Even just measuring robustness is a challenge. Adversarial perturbations are the default, but they can paint the wrong picture: they can correspond to human motions that are unlikely to occur during natural interactions with people. A robot policy might fail under small adversarial perturbations but work under large natural perturbations. We propose that capturing robustness in these interactive settings requires constructing and analyzing the entire natural-adversarial frontier: the Pareto-frontier of human policies that are the best trade-offs between naturalness and low robot performance. We introduce RIGID, a method for constructing this frontier by training adversarial human policies that trade off between minimizing robot reward and acting human-like (as measured by a discriminator). On an Assistive Gym task, we use RIGID to analyze the performance of standard collaborative Reinforcement Learning, as well as the performance of existing methods meant to increase robustness. We also compare the frontier RIGID identifies with the failures identified in expert adversarial interaction, and with naturally-occurring failures during user interaction. Overall, we find evidence that RIGID can provide a meaningful measure of robustness predictive of deployment performance, and uncover failure cases in human-robot interaction that are difficult to find manually. https://ood-human.github.io.

We investigate the boundary between chemotaxis driven by spatial estimation of gradients and chemotaxis driven by temporal estimation. While it is well known that spatial chemotaxis becomes disadvantageous for small organisms at high noise levels, it is unclear whether there is a discontinuous switch of optimal strategies or a continuous transition exists. Here, we employ deep reinforcement learning to study the possible integration of spatial and temporal information in an a priori unconstrained manner. We parameterize such a combined chemotactic policy by a recurrent neural network and evaluate it using a minimal theoretical model of a chemotactic cell. By comparing with constrained variants of the policy, we show that it converges to purely temporal and spatial strategies at small and large cell sizes, respectively. We find that the transition between the regimes is continuous, with the combined strategy outperforming in the transition region both the constrained variants as well as models that explicitly integrate spatial and temporal information. Finally, by utilizing the attribution method of integrated gradients, we show that the policy relies on a non-trivial combination of spatially and temporally derived gradient information in a ratio that varies dynamically during the chemotactic trajectories.

Contact-rich manipulation is common in a wide range of robotic applications, including assembly [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8], object pivoting [9, 10, 11], grasping[12, 13, 14], and pushing [15, 16]. To accomplish these tasks, robots need to learn both the manipulation trajectory and the force control parameters. The manipulation trajectory guides the robot toward completing the task while physically engaging with the environment, whereas the force control parameters regulate the contact force. Incorrect control parameters can lead to oscillations and excessive contact forces that may damage the robot or the environment. Past works have tackled the contact-rich skill-learning problem in different ways. First, the majority of previous works [2, 10, 6, 7, 3, 17, 9, 18, 19] focus on learning the manipulation trajectories and rely on human experts to manually tune force control parameters. While this simplification has demonstrated remarkable performance in many applications, letting human labor tune control parameters is still inconvenient. Furthermore, the tuned parameter for one task may not generalize well to other task settings with different kinematic or dynamic properties. For example, assembly tasks with different clearances will require different control parameters.

This work addresses the challenge of navigating expansive spaces with sparse rewards through Reinforcement Learning (RL). Using topological maps, we elevate elementary actions to object-oriented macro actions, enabling a simple Deep Q-Network (DQN) agent to solve otherwise practically impossible Figure 1: Screenshots of the environment.

This paper aims to explore the potential of combining Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) with Knowledge Distillation (KD) by distilling various DRL algorithms and studying their distillation effects. By doing so, the computational burden of deep models could be reduced while maintaining the performance. The primary objective is to provide a benchmark for evaluating the performance of different DRL algorithms that have been refined using KD techniques. By distilling these algorithms, the goal is to develop efficient and fast DRL models. This research is expected to provide valuable insights that can facilitate further advancements in this promising direction. By exploring the combination of DRL and KD, this work aims to promote the development of models that require fewer GPU resources, learn more quickly, and make faster decisions in complex environments. The results of this research have the capacity to significantly advance the field of DRL and pave the way for the future deployment of resource-efficient, decision-making intelligent systems.

Language agents have shown some ability to interact with an external environment, e.g., a virtual world such as ScienceWorld, to perform complex tasks, e.g., growing a plant, without the startup costs of reinforcement learning. However, despite their zero-shot capabilities, these agents to date do not continually improve over time beyond performance refinement on a specific task. Here we present CLIN, the first language-based agent to achieve this, so that it continually improves over multiple trials, including when both the environment and task are varied, and without requiring parameter updates. Our approach is to use a persistent, dynamic, textual memory centered on causal abstractions (rather than general "helpful hints") that is regularly updated after each trial so that the agent gradually learns useful knowledge for new trials. In the ScienceWorld benchmark, CLIN is able to continually improve on repeated trials on the same task and environment, outperforming state-of-the-art reflective language agents like Reflexion by 23 absolute points. CLIN can also transfer its learning to new environments (or new tasks), improving its zero-shot performance by 4 points (13 for new tasks) and can further improve performance there through continual memory updates, enhancing performance by an additional 17 points (7 for new tasks). This suggests a new architecture for agents built on frozen models that can still continually and rapidly improve over time.