Determining the optimal cost function parameters of Model Predictive Control (MPC) to optimize multiple control objectives is a challenging and time-consuming task. Multiobjective Bayesian Optimization (BO) techniques solve this problem by determining a Pareto optimal parameter set for an MPC with static weights. However, a single parameter set may not deliver the most optimal closed-loop control performance when the context of the MPC operating conditions changes during its operation, urging the need to adapt the cost function weights at runtime. Deep Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms can automatically learn context-dependent optimal parameter sets and dynamically adapt for a Weightsvarying MPC (WMPC). However, learning cost function weights from scratch in a continuous action space may lead to unsafe operating states. To solve this, we propose a novel approach limiting the RL actions within a safe learning space representing a catalog of pre-optimized BO Pareto-optimal weight sets. We conceive a RL agent not to learn in a continuous space but to proactively anticipate upcoming control tasks and to choose the most optimal discrete actions, each corresponding to a single set of Pareto optimal weights, context-dependent. Hence, even an untrained RL agent guarantees a safe and optimal performance. Experimental results demonstrate that an untrained RL-WMPC shows Pareto-optimal closed-loop behavior and training the RL-WMPC helps exhibit a performance beyond the Pareto-front.

Aligning agent behaviors with diverse human preferences remains a challenging problem in reinforcement learning (RL), owing to the inherent abstractness and mutability of human preferences. To address these issues, we propose AlignDiff, a novel framework that leverages RL from Human Feedback (RLHF) to quantify human preferences, covering abstractness, and utilizes them to guide diffusion planning for zero-shot behavior customizing, covering mutability. AlignDiff can accurately match user-customized behaviors and efficiently switch from one to another. To build the framework, we first establish the multi-perspective human feedback datasets, which contain comparisons for the attributes of diverse behaviors, and then train an attribute strength model to predict quantified relative strengths. After relabeling behavioral datasets with relative strengths, we proceed to train an attribute-conditioned diffusion model, which serves as a planner with the attribute strength model as a director for preference aligning at the inference phase. We evaluate AlignDiff on various locomotion tasks and demonstrate its superior performance on preference matching, switching, and covering compared to other baselines. Its capability of completing unseen downstream tasks under human instructions also showcases the promising potential for human-AI collaboration. More visualization videos are released on https://aligndiff.github.io/.

Recently, there are many efforts attempting to learn useful policies for continuous control in visual reinforcement learning (RL). In this scenario, it is important to learn a generalizable policy, as the testing environment may differ from the training environment, e.g., there exist distractors during deployment. Many practical algorithms are proposed to handle this problem. However, to the best of our knowledge, none of them provide a theoretical understanding of what affects the generalization gap and why their proposed methods work. In this paper, we bridge this issue by theoretically answering the key factors that contribute to the generalization gap when the testing environment has distractors. Our theories indicate that minimizing the representation distance between training and testing environments, which aligns with human intuition, is the most critical for the benefit of reducing the generalization gap. Our theoretical results are supported by the empirical evidence in the DMControl Generalization Benchmark (DMC-GB).

Contextual Markov decision processes (CMDPs) describe a class of reinforcement learning problems in which the transition kernels and reward functions can change over time with different MDPs indexed by a context variable. While CMDPs serve as an important framework to model many real-world applications with time-varying environments, they are largely unexplored from theoretical perspective. In this paper, we study CMDPs under two linear function approximation models: Model I with context-varying representations and common linear weights for all contexts; and Model II with common representations for all contexts and context-varying linear weights. For both models, we propose novel model-based algorithms and show that they enjoy guaranteed $\epsilon$-suboptimality gap with desired polynomial sample complexity. In particular, instantiating our result for the first model to the tabular CMDP improves the existing result by removing the reachability assumption. Our result for the second model is the first-known result for such a type of function approximation models. Comparison between our results for the two models further indicates that having context-varying features leads to much better sample efficiency than having common representations for all contexts under linear CMDPs.

So far the flow of knowledge has primarily been from conventional single-objective RL (SORL) into MORL, with algorithmic Research in multi-objective reinforcement learning(MORL) has introduced innovations from SORL being adapted to the context of multiple the utility-based paradigm, which makes use of both environmental objectives [2, 6, 22, 34]. This paper runs counter to that trend, rewards and a function that defines the utility derived as we will argue that the utility-based paradigm which has been bytheuser from thoserewards. Inthis paperweextend this paradigm widely adopted in MORL [5, 13, 21], has both relevance and benefits to the context of single-objective reinforcement learning(RL), to SORL. We present a general framework for utility-based RL and outline multiple potential benefits including the ability to perform (UBRL), which unifies the SORL and MORL frameworks, and discuss multi-policy learning across tasks relating to uncertain objectives, benefits and potential applications of this for single-objective risk-aware RL, discounting, and safe RL. We also examine problems - in particular focusing on the novel potential UBRL offers the algorithmic implications of adopting a utility-based approach.

Humans can quickly learn new behaviors by leveraging background world knowledge. In contrast, agents trained with reinforcement learning (RL) typically learn behaviors from scratch. We thus propose a novel approach that uses the vast amounts of general and indexable world knowledge encoded in vision-language models (VLMs) pre-trained on Internet-scale data for embodied RL. We initialize policies with VLMs by using them as promptable representations: embeddings that are grounded in visual observations and encode semantic features based on the VLM's internal knowledge, as elicited through prompts that provide task context and auxiliary information. We evaluate our approach on visually-complex, long horizon RL tasks in Minecraft and robot navigation in Habitat. We find that our policies trained on embeddings extracted from general-purpose VLMs outperform equivalent policies trained on generic, non-promptable image embeddings. We also find our approach outperforms instruction-following methods and performs comparably to domain-specific embeddings.

MaxEntIRL, f-IRL) search over candidate reward functions and solve a reinforcement learning problem in the inner loop. This creates a rather strange inversion where a harder problem, reinforcement learning, is in the inner loop of a presumably easier problem, imitation learning. In this work, we show that better utilization of expert demonstrations can reduce the need for hard exploration in the inner RL loop, hence accelerating learning. Specifically, we propose two simple recipes: (1) placing expert transitions into the replay buffer of the inner RL algorithm (e.g. Soft-Actor Critic) which directly informs the learner about high reward states instead of forcing the learner to discover them through extensive exploration, and (2) using expert actions in Q value bootstrapping in order to improve the target Q value estimates and more accurately describe high value expert states. Our methods show significant gains over a MaxEntIRL baseline on the benchmark MuJoCo suite of tasks, speeding up recovery to 70% of deterministic expert performance by 2.13x on HalfCheetah-v2, 2.6x on Ant-v2, 18x on Hopper-v2, and 3.36x on Walker2d-v2. The core problem in inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) is to recover a reward function that explains the expert's actions as being optimal, and a policy that is optimal with respect to this reward function, thus matching expert behavior. Existing methods like MaxEntIRL (Ziebart et al., 2008) and f-IRL (Ni et al., 2020) accomplish this by running an outer-loop that updates a reward function and an inner-loop that runs reinforcement learning (RL), usually many steps of policy iteration.

Adversarial Malware Generation (AMG), the generation of adversarial malware variants to strengthen Deep Learning (DL)-based malware detectors has emerged as a crucial tool in the development of proactive cyberdefense. However, the majority of extant works offer subtle perturbations or additions to executable files and do not explore full-file obfuscation. In this study, we show that an open-source encryption tool coupled with a Reinforcement Learning (RL) framework can successfully obfuscate malware to evade state-of-the-art malware detection engines and outperform techniques that use advanced modification methods. Our results show that the proposed method improves the evasion rate from 27%-49% compared to widely-used state-of-the-art reinforcement learning-based methods.

Federated Learning (FL) is a promising machine learning approach for Internet of Things (IoT), but it has to address network congestion problems when the population of IoT devices grows. Hierarchical FL (HFL) alleviates this issue by distributing model aggregation to multiple edge servers. Nevertheless, the challenge of communication overhead remains, especially in scenarios where all IoT devices simultaneously join the training process. For scalability, practical HFL schemes select a subset of IoT devices to participate in the training, hence the notion of device scheduling. In this setting, only selected IoT devices are scheduled to participate in the global training, with each of them being assigned to one edge server. Existing HFL assignment methods are primarily based on search mechanisms, which suffer from high latency in finding the optimal assignment. This paper proposes an improved K-Center algorithm for device scheduling and introduces a deep reinforcement learning-based approach for assigning IoT devices to edge servers. Experiments show that scheduling 50% of IoT devices is generally adequate for achieving convergence in HFL with much lower time delay and energy consumption. In cases where reduction in energy consumption (such as in Green AI) and reduction of messages (to avoid burst traffic) are key objectives, scheduling 30% IoT devices allows a substantial reduction in energy and messages with similar model accuracy.

Fast adapting to unknown peers (partners or opponents) with different strategies is a key challenge in multi-agent games. To do so, it is crucial for the agent to efficiently probe and identify the peer's strategy, as this is the prerequisite for carrying out the best response in adaptation. However, it is difficult to explore the strategies of unknown peers, especially when the games are partially observable and have a long horizon. In this paper, we propose a peer identification reward, which rewards the learning agent based on how well it can identify the behavior pattern of the peer over the historical context, such as the observation over multiple episodes. This reward motivates the agent to learn a context-aware policy for effective exploration and fast adaptation, i.e., to actively seek and collect informative feedback from peers when uncertain about their policies and to exploit the context to perform the best response when confident. We evaluate our method on diverse testbeds that involve competitive (Kuhn Poker), cooperative (PO-Overcooked), or mixed (Predator-Prey-W) games with peer agents. We demonstrate that our method induces more active exploration behavior, achieving faster adaptation and better outcomes than existing methods.