he evaluation of the impact of actions undertaken is essential in management. This paper assesses the impact of efforts considered to mitigate risk and create safe environments on a global scale. We measure this impact by looking at the probability of improvement over a specific short period of time. Using the World Risk Index, we conduct a temporal analysis of global disaster risk dynamics from 2011 to 2021. This temporal exploration through the lens of the World Risk Index provides insights into the complex dynamics of disaster risk. We found that, despite sustained efforts, the global landscape remains divided into two main clusters: high susceptibility and moderate susceptibility, regardless of geographical location. This clustering was achieved using a semi-supervised approach through the Label Spreading algorithm, with 98% accuracy. We also found that the prediction of clusters achieved through supervised learning on the period considered in this study (one, three, and five years) showed that the Logistic regression (almost 99% at each stage) performed better than other classifiers. This suggests that the current policies and mechanisms are not effective in helping countries move from a hazardous position to a safer one during the period considered. In fact, statistical projections using a scenario analysis indicate that there is only a 1% chance of such a shift occurring within a five-year timeframe. This sobering reality highlights the need for a paradigm shift. Traditional long-term disaster management strategies are not effective for countries that are highly vulnerable. Our findings indicate the need for an innovative approach that is tailored to the specific vulnerabilities of these nations. As the threat of vulnerability persists, our research calls for the development of new strategies that can effectively address the ongoing challenges of disaster risk management

Alzheimer's disease (AD), the predominant form of dementia, poses a growing global challenge and underscores the urgency of accurate and early diagnosis. The clinical technique radiologists adopt for distinguishing between mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD using Machine Resonance Imaging (MRI) encounter hurdles because they are not consistent and reliable. Machine learning has been shown to offer promise for early AD diagnosis. However, existing models focused on focal fine-grain features without considerations to focal structural features that give off information on neurodegeneration of the brain cerebral cortex. Therefore, this paper proposes a machine learning (ML) framework that integrates Gamma correction, an image enhancement technique, and includes a structure-focused neurodegeneration convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture called SNeurodCNN for discriminating between AD and MCI. The ML framework leverages the mid-sagittal and para-sagittal brain image viewpoints of the structure-focused Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset. Through experiments, our proposed machine learning framework shows exceptional performance. The parasagittal viewpoint set achieves 97.8% accuracy, with 97.0% specificity and 98.5% sensitivity. The midsagittal viewpoint is shown to present deeper insights into the structural brain changes given the increase in accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity, which are 98.1% 97.2%, and 99.0%, respectively. Using GradCAM technique, we show that our proposed model is capable of capturing the structural dynamics of MCI and AD which exist about the frontal lobe, occipital lobe, cerebellum, and parietal lobe. Therefore, our model itself as a potential brain structural change Digi-Biomarker for early diagnosis of AD.

The development of facial biometric systems has contributed greatly to the development of the computer vision field. Nowadays, there's always a need to develop a multimodal system that combines multiple biometric traits in an efficient, meaningful way. In this paper, we introduce "IdentiFace" which is a multimodal facial biometric system that combines the core of facial recognition with some of the most important soft biometric traits such as gender, face shape, and emotion. We also focused on developing the system using only VGG-16 inspired architecture with minor changes across different subsystems. This unification allows for simpler integration across modalities. It makes it easier to interpret the learned features between the tasks which gives a good indication about the decision-making process across the facial modalities and potential connection. For the recognition problem, we acquired a 99.2% test accuracy for five classes with high intra-class variations using data collected from the FERET database[1]. We achieved 99.4% on our dataset and 95.15% on the public dataset[2] in the gender recognition problem. We were also able to achieve a testing accuracy of 88.03% in the face-shape problem using the celebrity face-shape dataset[3]. Finally, we achieved a decent testing accuracy of 66.13% in the emotion task which is considered a very acceptable accuracy compared to related work on the FER2013 dataset[4].

The prevalence of dementia has increased over time as global life expectancy improves and populations age. An individual's risk of developing dementia is influenced by various genetic, lifestyle, and environmental factors, among others. Predicting dementia risk may enable individuals to employ mitigation strategies or lifestyle changes to delay dementia onset. Current computational approaches to dementia prediction only return risk upon narrow categories of variables and do not account for interactions between different risk variables. The proposed framework utilizes a novel holistic approach to dementia risk prediction and is the first to incorporate various sources of tabular environmental pollution and lifestyle factor data with network systems biology-based genetic data. LightGBM gradient boosting was employed to ensure validity of included factors. This approach successfully models interactions between variables through an original weighted integration method coined Sysable. Multiple machine learning models trained the algorithm to reduce reliance on a single model. The developed approach surpassed all existing dementia risk prediction approaches, with a sensitivity of 85%, specificity of 99%, geometric accuracy of 92%, and AUROC of 91.7%. A transfer learning model was implemented as well. De-biasing algorithms were run on the model via the AI Fairness 360 Library. Effects of demographic disparities on dementia prevalence were analyzed to potentially highlight areas in need and promote equitable and accessible care. The resulting model was additionally integrated into a user-friendly app providing holistic predictions and personalized risk mitigation strategies. The developed model successfully employs holistic computational dementia risk prediction for clinical use.

Foundation models such as large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities redefining the field of artificial intelligence. At the same time, they present pressing and challenging socio-technical risks regarding the trustworthiness of their outputs and their alignment with human values and ethics [Bommasani et al., 2021]. Evaluating LLMs is therefore a multi-dimensional problem, where those risks are assessed across diverse tasks and domains [Chang et al., 2023]. In order to quantify these risks, Liang et al. [2022], Wang et al. [2023], Huang et al. [2023] proposed benchmarks of automatic metrics for probing the trustworthiness of LLMs. These metrics include accuracy, robustness, fairness, toxicity of the outputs, etc. Human evaluation benchmarks can be even more nuanced, and are often employed when tasks surpass the scope of standard metrics. Notable benchmarks based on human and automatic evaluations include, among others, Chatbot Arena [Zheng et al., 2023], HELM [Bommasani et al., 2023], MosaicML's Eval, Open LLM Leaderboard [Wolf, 2023], and BIG-bench [Srivastava et al., 2022], each catering to specific evaluation areas such as chatbot performance, knowledge assessment, and domain-specific challenges. Traditional metrics, however, sometimes do not correlate well with human judgments.

This work presents a novel reconfigurable architecture for Low Latency Graph Neural Network (LL-GNN) designs for particle detectors, delivering unprecedented low latency performance. Incorporating FPGA-based GNNs into particle detectors presents a unique challenge since it requires sub-microsecond latency to deploy the networks for online event selection with a data rate of hundreds of terabytes per second in the Level-1 triggers at the CERN Large Hadron Collider experiments. This paper proposes a novel outer-product based matrix multiplication approach, which is enhanced by exploiting the structured adjacency matrix and a column-major data layout. Moreover, a fusion step is introduced to further reduce the end-to-end design latency by eliminating unnecessary boundaries. Furthermore, a GNN-specific algorithm-hardware co-design approach is presented which not only finds a design with a much better latency but also finds a high accuracy design under given latency constraints. To facilitate this, a customizable template for this low latency GNN hardware architecture has been designed and open-sourced, which enables the generation of low-latency FPGA designs with efficient resource utilization using a high-level synthesis tool. Evaluation results show that our FPGA implementation is up to 9.0 times faster and achieves up to 13.1 times higher power efficiency than a GPU implementation. Compared to the previous FPGA implementations, this work achieves 6.51 to 16.7 times lower latency. Moreover, the latency of our FPGA design is sufficiently low to enable deployment of GNNs in a sub-microsecond, real-time collider trigger system, enabling it to benefit from improved accuracy. The proposed LL-GNN design advances the next generation of trigger systems by enabling sophisticated algorithms to process experimental data efficiently.

Machine learning models, in particular deep neural networks, are currently an integral part of various applications, from healthcare to finance. However, using sensitive data to train these models raises concerns about privacy and security. One method that has emerged to verify if the trained models are privacy-preserving is Membership Inference Attacks (MIA), which allows adversaries to determine whether a specific data point was part of a model's training dataset. While a series of MIAs have been proposed in the literature, only a few can achieve high True Positive Rates (TPR) in the low False Positive Rate (FPR) region (0.01%~1%). This is a crucial factor to consider for an MIA to be practically useful in real-world settings. In this paper, we present a novel approach to MIA that is aimed at significantly improving TPR at low FPRs. Our method, named learning-based difficulty calibration for MIA(LDC-MIA), characterizes data records by their hardness levels using a neural network classifier to determine membership. The experiment results show that LDC-MIA can improve TPR at low FPR by up to 4x compared to the other difficulty calibration based MIAs. It also has the highest Area Under ROC curve (AUC) across all datasets. Our method's cost is comparable with most of the existing MIAs, but is orders of magnitude more efficient than one of the state-of-the-art methods, LiRA, while achieving similar performance.

Active learning is a commonly used approach that reduces the labeling effort required to train deep neural networks. However, the effectiveness of current active learning methods is limited by their closed-world assumptions, which assume that all data in the unlabeled pool comes from a set of predefined known classes. This assumption is often not valid in practical situations, as there may be unknown classes in the unlabeled data, leading to the active open-set annotation problem. The presence of unknown classes in the data can significantly impact the performance of existing active learning methods due to the uncertainty they introduce. To address this issue, we propose a novel data-centric active learning method called NEAT that actively annotates open-set data. NEAT is designed to label known classes data from a pool of both known and unknown classes unlabeled data. It utilizes the clusterability of labels to identify the known classes from the unlabeled pool and selects informative samples from those classes based on a consistency criterion that measures inconsistencies between model predictions and local feature distribution. Unlike the recently proposed learning-centric method for the same problem, NEAT is much more computationally efficient and is a data-centric active open-set annotation method. Our experiments demonstrate that NEAT achieves significantly better performance than state-of-the-art active learning methods for active open-set annotation.

The development of cancer is triggered by alterations and mutations in the DNA. The majority of DNA changes responsible for cancer occur within specific regions known as genes. Among the various types of cancers, skin cancer is among the five on the list. If we disregard breast and prostate cancer which are gender-dependent, skin cancer will remain in the third largest cancer category among many others. Based on the statistics released by the American Cancer Society (ACS) [1], there were 58,120 recorded cases of skin cancer among males and 39,490 cases among females. An intriguing observation is that the incidence of skin cancer has been steadily rising from 1992 to 2019, with a notable exception in 2020 [2]. This exception can be attributed to the understandable decrease in cases during the COVID-19 pandemic, as people were mostly confined to their homes. This decline is reasonable considering that exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation is a significant contributing factor to the development of skin cancer. More people are diagnosed with skin cancer each year in the U.S. than all other cancers combined [3].

Bayesian Neural Networks (BayNNs) can inherently estimate predictive uncertainty, facilitating informed decision-making. Dropout-based BayNNs are increasingly implemented in spintronics-based computation-in-memory architectures for resourceconstrained yet high-performance safety-critical applications. Although uncertainty estimation is important, the reliability of Dropout generation and BayNN computation is equally important for target applications but is overlooked in existing works. However, testing BayNNs is significantly more challenging compared to conventional NNs, due to their stochastic nature. In this paper, we present for the first time the model of the non-idealities of the spintronics-based Dropout module and analyze their impact on uncertainty estimates and accuracy. Furthermore, we propose a testing framework based on repeatability ranking for Dropout-based BayNN with up to 100% fault coverage while using only 0.2% of training data as test vectors. Bayesian Neural Networks (BayNNs) offer substantial benefits over conventional neural networks (NNs), particularly in safety-critical applications where reliability and confidence in prediction are paramount [1]. Unlike traditional NNs, BayNNs can inherently capture and estimate the uncertainty of their predictions, enhancing decision-making under uncertain conditions. However, their implementation faces significant computational bottlenecks, especially on edge devices. Spintronics-based computation-in-memory (Spintronics-CIM) architectures are a promising solution for the hardware realization of BayNNs as they mitigate some of the inherent computational costs, balancing high-performance demands with the constraints of resourcelimited devices.