Abstract--Continuous Integration (CI) has become a wellestablished software development practice for automatically and continuously integrating code changes during software development. An increasing number of Machine Learning (ML) based approaches for automation of CI phases are being reported in the literature. It is timely and relevant to provide a Systemization of Knowledge (SoK) of ML-based approaches for CI phases. Our systematic analysis also highlights the deficiencies of the existing ML-based solutions that can be improved for advancing the state-of-the-art. Given the variety of employed techniques in applying ML solutions in CI, and growing interest in this domain, it is In recent years, the software development industry has seen necessary to systematically identify state-of-the-art practices a significant shift towards the adoption of Continuous Integration used for automating CI tasks through ML methods.

Reliable application of machine learning-based decision systems in the wild is one of the major challenges currently investigated by the field. A large portion of established approaches aims to detect erroneous predictions by means of assigning confidence scores. This confidence may be obtained by either quantifying the model's predictive uncertainty, learning explicit scoring functions, or assessing whether the input is in line with the training distribution. Curiously, while these approaches all state to address the same eventual goal of detecting failures of a classifier upon real-life application, they currently constitute largely separated research fields with individual evaluation protocols, which either exclude a substantial part of relevant methods or ignore large parts of relevant failure sources. In this work, we systematically reveal current pitfalls caused by these inconsistencies and derive requirements for a holistic and realistic evaluation of failure detection. To demonstrate the relevance of this unified perspective, we present a large-scale empirical study for the first time enabling benchmarking confidence scoring functions w.r.t all relevant methods and failure sources. The revelation of a simple softmax response baseline as the overall best performing method underlines the drastic shortcomings of current evaluation in the abundance of publicized research on confidence scoring. Code and trained models are at https://github.com/IML-DKFZ/fd-shifts.

Random forest is a popular machine learning approach for the analysis of high-dimensional data because it is flexible and provides variable importance measures for the selection of relevant features. However, the complex relationships between the features are usually not considered for the selection and thus also neglected for the characterization of the analysed samples. Here we propose two novel approaches that focus on the mutual impact of features in random forests. Mutual forest impact (MFI) is a relation parameter that evaluates the mutual association of the featurs to the outcome and, hence, goes beyond the analysis of correlation coefficients. Mutual impurity reduction (MIR) is an importance measure that combines this relation parameter with the importance of the individual features. MIR and MFI are implemented together with testing procedures that generate p-values for the selection of related and important features. Applications to various simulated data sets and the comparison to other methods for feature selection and relation analysis show that MFI and MIR are very promising to shed light on the complex relationships between features and outcome. In addition, they are not affected by common biases, e.g. that features with many possible splits or high minor allele frequencies are prefered.

Data sparsity is a main problem hindering the development of code-switching (CS) NLP systems. In this paper, we investigate data augmentation techniques for synthesizing dialectal Arabic-English CS text. We perform lexical replacements using word-aligned parallel corpora where CS points are either randomly chosen or learnt using a sequence-to-sequence model. We compare these approaches against dictionary-based replacements. We assess the quality of the generated sentences through human evaluation and evaluate the effectiveness of data augmentation on machine translation (MT), automatic speech recognition (ASR), and speech translation (ST) tasks. Results show that using a predictive model results in more natural CS sentences compared to the random approach, as reported in human judgements. In the downstream tasks, despite the random approach generating more data, both approaches perform equally (outperforming dictionary-based replacements). Overall, data augmentation achieves 34% improvement in perplexity, 5.2% relative improvement on WER for ASR task, +4.0-5.1 BLEU points on MT task, and +2.1-2.2 BLEU points on ST over a baseline trained on available data without augmentation.

Recently, many improved naive Bayes methods have been developed with enhanced discrimination capabilities. Among them, regularized naive Bayes (RNB) produces excellent performance by balancing the discrimination power and generalization capability. Data discretization is important in naive Bayes. By grouping similar values into one interval, the data distribution could be better estimated. However, existing methods including RNB often discretize the data into too few intervals, which may result in a significant information loss. To address this problem, we propose a semi-supervised adaptive discriminative discretization framework for naive Bayes, which could better estimate the data distribution by utilizing both labeled data and unlabeled data through pseudo-labeling techniques. The proposed method also significantly reduces the information loss during discretization by utilizing an adaptive discriminative discretization scheme, and hence greatly improves the discrimination power of classifiers. The proposed RNB+, i.e., regularized naive Bayes utilizing the proposed discretization framework, is systematically evaluated on a wide range of machine-learning datasets. It significantly and consistently outperforms state-of-the-art NB classifiers.

In many classification models, data is discretized to better estimate its distribution. Existing discretization methods often target at maximizing the discriminant power of discretized data, while overlooking the fact that the primary target of data discretization in classification is to improve the generalization performance. As a result, the data tend to be over-split into many small bins since the data without discretization retain the maximal discriminant information. Thus, we propose a Max-Dependency-Min-Divergence (MDmD) criterion that maximizes both the discriminant information and generalization ability of the discretized data. More specifically, the Max-Dependency criterion maximizes the statistical dependency between the discretized data and the classification variable while the Min-Divergence criterion explicitly minimizes the JS-divergence between the training data and the validation data for a given discretization scheme. The proposed MDmD criterion is technically appealing, but it is difficult to reliably estimate the high-order joint distributions of attributes and the classification variable. We hence further propose a more practical solution, Max-Relevance-Min-Divergence (MRmD) discretization scheme, where each attribute is discretized separately, by simultaneously maximizing the discriminant information and the generalization ability of the discretized data. The proposed MRmD is compared with the state-of-the-art discretization algorithms under the naive Bayes classification framework on 45 machine-learning benchmark datasets. It significantly outperforms all the compared methods on most of the datasets.

Accurate lung nodule segmentation is crucial for early-stage lung cancer diagnosis, as it can substantially enhance patient survival rates. Computed tomography (CT) images are widely employed for early diagnosis in lung nodule analysis. However, the heterogeneity of lung nodules, size diversity, and the complexity of the surrounding environment pose challenges for developing robust nodule segmentation methods. In this study, we propose an efficient end-to-end framework, the multi-encoder-based self-adaptive hard attention network (MESAHA-Net), for precise lung nodule segmentation in CT scans. MESAHA-Net comprises three encoding paths, an attention block, and a decoder block, facilitating the integration of three types of inputs: CT slice patches, forward and backward maximum intensity projection (MIP) images, and region of interest (ROI) masks encompassing the nodule. By employing a novel adaptive hard attention mechanism, MESAHA-Net iteratively performs slice-by-slice 2D segmentation of lung nodules, focusing on the nodule region in each slice to generate 3D volumetric segmentation of lung nodules. The proposed framework has been comprehensively evaluated on the LIDC-IDRI dataset, the largest publicly available dataset for lung nodule segmentation. The results demonstrate that our approach is highly robust for various lung nodule types, outperforming previous state-of-the-art techniques in terms of segmentation accuracy and computational complexity, rendering it suitable for real-time clinical implementation.

The Electrocardiogram (ECG) measures the electrical cardiac activity generated by the heart to detect abnormal heartbeat and heart attack. However, the irregular occurrence of the abnormalities demands continuous monitoring of heartbeats. Machine learning techniques are leveraged to automate the task to reduce labor work needed during monitoring. In recent years, many companies have launched products with ECG monitoring and irregular heartbeat alert. Among all classification algorithms, the time series-based algorithm dynamic time warping (DTW) is widely adopted to undertake the ECG classification task. Though progress has been achieved, the DTW-based ECG classification also brings a new attacking vector of leaking the patients' diagnosis results. This paper shows that the ECG input samples' labels can be stolen via a side-channel attack, Flush+Reload. In particular, we first identify the vulnerability of DTW for ECG classification, i.e., the correlation between warping path choice and prediction results. Then we implement an attack that leverages Flush+Reload to monitor the warping path selection with known ECG data and then build a predictor for constructing the relation between warping path selection and labels of input ECG samples. Based on experiments, we find that the Flush+Reload-based inference leakage can achieve an 84.0\% attacking success rate to identify the labels of the two samples in DTW.

Confusion matrices and derived metrics provide a comprehensive framework for the evaluation of model performance in machine learning. These are well-known and extensively employed in the supervised learning domain, particularly classification. Surprisingly, such a framework has not been fully explored in the context of clustering validation. Indeed, just recently such a gap has been bridged with the introduction of the Area Under the ROC Curve for Clustering (AUCC), an internal/relative Clustering Validation Index (CVI) that allows for clustering validation in real application scenarios. In this work we explore the Area Under Precision-Recall Curve (and related metrics) in the context of clustering validation. We show that these are not only appropriate as CVIs, but should also be preferred in the presence of cluster imbalance. We perform a comprehensive evaluation of proposed and state-of-art CVIs on real and simulated data sets. Our observations corroborate towards an unified validation framework for supervised and unsupervised learning, given that they are consistent with existing guidelines established for the evaluation of supervised learning models.

The success of the multilingual automatic speech recognition systems empowered many voice-driven applications. However, measuring the performance of such systems remains a major challenge, due to its dependency on manually transcribed speech data in both mono- and multilingual scenarios. In this paper, we propose a novel multilingual framework -- eWER3 -- jointly trained on acoustic and lexical representation to estimate word error rate. We demonstrate the effectiveness of eWER3 to (i) predict WER without using any internal states from the ASR and (ii) use the multilingual shared latent space to push the performance of the close-related languages. We show our proposed multilingual model outperforms the previous monolingual word error rate estimation method (eWER2) by an absolute 9\% increase in Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC), with better overall estimation between the predicted and reference WER.